When
Jesus came on the scene he could touch the leper and make the leper clean.
So it is no surprise, when
Jesus comes on the scene, that He tells people through His words and His actions that God is not angry with His people, that He does not want more sacrifices and offerings, that He loves, accepts, and freely forgives all people, no matter what.
When
Jesus came on the scene, the demons knew they were going down.
But now
Jesus comes on the scene.
Jesus came on the scene, and He said, «Look, people, we're not going to waste our time anymore on man's opinions.
Oh and so much more years before
Jesus came on the scene we could piece together the information in the Old Testament and it will seem like a script is being followed.
Then
Jesus came on the scene, and he is on the other extreme, from the Pharisaical viewpoint.
Not exact matches
It is, for example, Tarwater learning of his own history — his whore mother and his birth at the
scene of a wreck — in the context of the history of Adam and the Second
Coming; it is in the remark by the Negro hand
on old Tarwater: «He was deep in this life, he was deep in
Jesus» misery»; it is Bishop, the idiot, whose fish eyes are the center of that «extension» into unreasonable, absurd love for both Tarwater and Rayber.
When police arrived
on the
scene and told her to get down, she responded
on camera for the whole world to hear: «In the name of
Jesus, this flag has to
come down.
What they were seeing, but not fully comprehending, was a side of God not fully revealed until
Jesus Christ
came on the
scene.
angels, and only
came on the
scene in the New Testament in the person of
Jesus Christ.
Some of these concentrate
on helping to place a passage in its original context so that the reader can be aware of the concerns of the author; others apply the passage to contemporary life; others, following the teaching of St Ignatius Loyola, encourage the reader to use her imagination to picture the
scene described and thereby
come close to
Jesus.
Bultmann saw the pure form in the «apothegm,» «the original specific fragment which would sum things up concisely; interest would be concentrated
on the word [spoken by]
Jesus at the end of a
scene; the details of the situation would lie far from this kind of form;
Jesus would never
come across as the initiator... everything not corresponding to this form Bultmann attributed to development.»