the point remains:
Jesus challenges both groups in ways they'd be hard pressed to handle.
Not exact matches
These are the extreme examples of the acceptance of the
challenge of the forgiveness offered in the proclamation of
Jesus, and they are the occasion for the greatest offence of
Jesus in the eyes of his opponents; but in the
group of his disciples and followers they could only have been a small minority, however spectacularly noticeable their presence in the
group might be.
I thought the article was interesting and thought provoking — a
challenge to evangelical Christians to embrace
Jesus» words independently from the hypocritical political
group - think of the religious right and raise their beliefs out of the political debate.
In them we find clearly articulated such themes as the importance of the communidades de base («grass - roots «Christian
groups);
Jesus as the liberator from hunger, misery, oppression and ignorance; the refusal to separate Christian sanctification from «temporal» tasks;
challenges to capitalism (as well as to Marxism); the theory of «dependency» on inhuman economic systems; the need for liberation from neocolonialism; the need for «conscienticization»; the need for the church to support the downtrodden; the correlation of peace and justice; and the reality of «institutionalized violence.»
We have stressed the direct and concrete nature of the
challenge to faith in the teaching of
Jesus; we turn now to explore further the response - as - obedience aspect of that teaching in terms of a
group of sayings which exhibit the radical and total character of the
challenge of
Jesus altogether.
In this story these characters and their situation are not depicted by analogy but directly, and, in consequence, the hearers are not left to draw their own conclusions, but rather are
challenged by the direct statement: «I tell you...» The
challenge is the one we have seen throughout this
group of parables, the fundamental
challenge of
Jesus to his hostile contemporaries.
The question of the historical
Jesus has to be faced and discussed, in accordance with one's basic presuppositions, in light of the
challenge issuing from the other
groups and the developments and changes going on in one's own.