This point of view is not compatible with
the Jewish way of understanding human existence, and it is in flat contradiction to what we now know about ourselves as human.
Not exact matches
It can suggest new
ways of understanding the relationship between the
Jewish scriptures and the New Testament.
The tiny dependent state
of Judaea was inevitably drawn into these events, but their impact upon the
Jewish mind was not such as to raise great spiritual issues, or to provoke new
understanding of the
ways of God with men.
Some may wish to use it as an historical book; after all, it is a collection
of writings bound up together in one volume, telling us
of the
way in which the
Jewish people came by God's self - disclosure to a deeper
understanding of the God they worshipped and a more adequate conception
of his purpose for his «chosen» race.
Jewish tradition holds that Torah has 70 faces, which tells me that Torah has many facets and can be
understood in a variety
of different
ways — indeed, it's that very richness and multiplicity which allows us to continue to experience it as holy.
He was able to picture early Christianity this
way with the more assurance because he did most
of his scholarly work before attention shifted back to Palestine in the time
of Jesus (thanks in part to the discovery
of the Dead Sea Scrolls), and before the themes
of light against darkness, life against death, came in the 1960s to be
understood as first century
Jewish themes.
It is precisely at this point that the church demonstrates in an ultimate
way whether it
understands itself in terms
of God's covenant with the
Jewish people.
While I in fact acknowledge that there is no
way that a devout Jew can really
understand Edith's willingness to embrace the Cross
of Christ just as Edith's mother could not
understand her child's Christian faith, all
of us people
of good will, be we
Jewish or Christian, can acknowledge our common tie to the mystery
of God's redemption that began with the covenant with Abraham, continued and was solidified in the exodus, and is with us today, whether we are still awaiting the promised messiah or believe that he has already come and is among us now.
It was not a mere act
of cleansing; the
Jewish historian Josephus, who
understands it in this
way, is in error at this point, just as he is in making completely innocuous the Baptist and the Baptist movement in general.
In granting moral accountability to women, Jesus automatically called into question the
way the role
of women, family, and blood kin had been
understood in the
Jewish tradition.
In their historical context, however, the issues, in response to which the Pauline formula was forged, no longer existed: because Christianity was well on the
way to becoming a gentile religion, separate from Judaism, the question
of the salutary benefit
of faith in Christ, which earlier had arisen among Christians who did not observe the cultic requirements
of Jewish law, and in that sense were without «works
of the law, arose now among Christians whose lives exhibited moral laxity, which could be
understood in terms
of popular moral philosophy.
The Egyptian and the
Jewish tradition are good representatives
of religious beliefs on baptism, and pave the
way for helping us
understand the cultural, historical, and religious background to Christian baptism.
They had been Jews writing in
Jewish terms largely for Jews, or for those brought up in the
Jewish tradition; but John was in Ephesus and he had to find some
way of expressing the truth
of the Gospel in a
way that a Greek could
understand.
I don't
understand the hatred between some blacks and the
Jewish community because I remember the Levys and I remember the great rabbi who stood with D. A. Holmes in Kansas City
way before Martin Luther King, Jr., brought that kind
of ecumenicity.