Sentences with phrase «joint child custody does»

Joint child custody does not mean parents will be sharing time with the children equally.

Not exact matches

Leving reports that the majority of mediation cases do resolve with joint custody of the children, and most do not go on to litigation.

If the mother lives in a state that recognizes a joint custody arrangement, then the child's father automatically has visitation rights if the child's mother does not specifically file for sole custody.

If a parent has been convicted of an act of domestic violence, a court in Oklahoma presumes that joint custody does not serve the child's best interests.

(8) Is joint custody in accord with the child's wishes and does he or she not have strong opposition to such an arrangement?

If parents have joint physical custody of three children all at different stages of development, an iron clad schedule, of who has the children when, does not allow for the needs of the individual children.

If the court does not grant joint custody, it must clearly state its reasons why joint custody is not in the best interests of the child.

A joint child custody agreement requires, first and foremost, that both parents do their level best to create a healthy parenting atmosphere, even despite the fact that you are getting separated or divorced and you may not be able to be the live - in full - time dad you once were.

Oregon courts also do not typically modify a joint custody agreement unless there is strong evidence of a change in circumstances that could adversely affect the child.

If you do have a joint custody arrangement for your children, you should be sure to keep track of all the money you spend on your child's living needs.

Joint custody does not necessarily mean that the child must spend equal time with or live with both parents.

I have been told that since Courts can award joint custody of children, they can do the same for pets.

However with no stated preference for joint custody over sole custody and with South Carolina case law favoring sole custody, I do not see any reason why this statute should radically alter South Carolina child custody determinations.

Joint physical custody doesn't necessarily mean that the child spends exactly half the time with each parent.

Thus the family court did not err when awarding sole custody of the children to the mother and specifically declining to award joint custody.

Joint custody is a somewhat misleading term that has nothing to do with how much time the child spends with each parent.

Second, he argued that «because he and Wife do not communicate well, joint custody would be healthiest, as it keeps the child from developing a negative perception of the non-custodial parent.»

Although move out of state by parent with joint legal custody and primary physical custody is not per se substantial change of circumstances such as to make that parent's continuing custody unreasonable, this does not mean that circumstances inherent in such move are always insufficient as a matter of law to warrant modifying child custody.

However, if there is a domestic violence issue, then you can usually show this paperwork to the agency as proof that you don't want to pursue joint custody and only want to file for sole custody of the children.

However, joint custody does not necessarily mean that the child will live with each parent for an equal amount of time.

Joint Custody Concerns: Do I Have to Pay Child Support If I Have Joint Custody?

Please don't think asking for joint custody or asking for half of the time with your children, will affect your obligation to pay child support or your right to receive child support.

If the other parent doesn't agree, consider this; Courts generally don't like to award sole custody to one parent without substantial evidence that joint custody is not in the child's best interest.

Changing joint legal custody usually involves proving that your ex doesn't contribute to decision making, even though he has the right to do so, or that his decisions place your children in dangerous situations.

A parent who does not have joint or sole legal custody of his child can make these kinds of decisions without consulting the other parent while his child is visiting with him.

In order to do so, Idaho child custody laws set factors to be considered by the court in verifying if joint custody is applicable over any other type of custody.

However, joint custody does not always mean that the child is splitting his or her time 50/50 between each parent.

However, joint custody doesn't guarantee that the child will spend an equal amount of time between both parents» households.

Joint legal custody does not mean that the parents have joint physical custody; it only means that both parents share the right to make decisions affecting the child's education, health, and welJoint legal custody does not mean that the parents have joint physical custody; it only means that both parents share the right to make decisions affecting the child's education, health, and weljoint physical custody; it only means that both parents share the right to make decisions affecting the child's education, health, and welfare.

Not all states automatically grant joint custody requests from parents, particularly if they can not get along well enough to make such an arrangement work, but courts often will do so if you can prove that the custody terms are in the best interests of your child.

Unlike some other states, California does not have a preference for joint custody, which means that California does not automatically presume that joint custody is the best decision for the child.

Joint legal custody does not mean your child will spend half his time with you and half with your spouse, so if this is what you want, you'll also need to explain in your parenting plan where he's going to live and on what days.

Unlike most states, Massachusetts does not presume that joint physical or legal custody is in the best interest of the child.

And joint legal custody, or shared custody, with one parent remaining as the primary physical custodian does little to alter the amount of time a child spends with the noncustodial parent, and does a lot to create control conflicts between parents who continue to harbor resentment stemming from the failure of the marriage.

What joint custody does is REDUCE the amount of time and attention a child receives from its primary parent (who we now refer to as the custodial parent — CP), to be made up, presumably, by the other parent.

It is ironic that the fathers» rightsters who complain about not wanting to be a «visitor» in their child's life, and therefore demand 50 - 50 joint custody, do not seem to recognize that their solution not only renders their child a continuous visitor shifting between two households, but also that the child then does not even have a home to which to return.

Joint custody does not even result in the father spending any more time with his children.»

I really feel for the children in joint custody cases in which the parents do not get along.

Joint custody does NOTHING to enhance the child's sense of stability and «home», and in fact goes a long way toward destablizing, if not outright destroying it.

Wallerstein: I can only conclude that joint custody as a legal presumption for all children is a misguided policy... children, especially girls, do very poorly in court ordered joint custody situations.

In fact, most children in court - imposed joint custody (not just those with abusive fathers) do poorly and are more depressed and disturbed than children in sole custody, even when the parents genuinely choose joint custody.

The above blather about attachment theory is to pave the way in advance for an excuse when infants and children placed into joint custody arrangements as a result of the «advice» in this article start doing badly.

Children who are in joint custody have not been shown to be protected by going back and forth between mothers» and fathers» households, and «shared parenting» does not duplicate the well - being found in intact homes (even though researching this database largely eliminates the problem of conflating data such as from unwed inner - city teenager households with divorced households, and even though this database would contain all the non-abusive, amicable divorce cases.)

Joint custody is not synonymous with forming multiple attachments, and joint custody (removing the infant or small child repeatedly from the primary parent) does indeed interfere with and disrupt attachments to the primary paJoint custody is not synonymous with forming multiple attachments, and joint custody (removing the infant or small child repeatedly from the primary parent) does indeed interfere with and disrupt attachments to the primary pajoint custody (removing the infant or small child repeatedly from the primary parent) does indeed interfere with and disrupt attachments to the primary parent.

Another personal situation factor that distorts the thinking of many professional women is that most did not get to be professional women by prioritizing the care and well - being of their children; now, they suffer guilt and the desire to prove that what they did (or didn't do) for their own children did not harm them, or helped them (whether that was joint custody, or extensive third party care.)

This is a tough one for the joint custody propagandists, because the research findings indicate that children do not need to spend more time with their fathers in order to maintain their levels of attachment with them.

Most parents have joint legal custody of their children, however, that does require that the parents are able to have some communication and the ability to consult and confer with each other regarding the children.

Nothing stops the parents from working out a different arrangement, such as joint custody or the father taking the child, if they're in agreement and their child's welfare doesn't suffer.

Angeline Jolie's filing of sole physical custody with visitation rights versus joint custody suggests that the Hollywood mom doesn't want her children to be with their father for very long hours.

The term joint custody does have child support implications, however.