Sentences with phrase «journal editors resign»

«Three Journal Editors Resign Over Paper by Skeptics,» The Heat is Online, July 29, 2003.

Not exact matches

In 1959, he even resigned from the journal Modern Age in order to distance himself from editor David Collier, whom he described as an «anti-Jewish freak.»

Mann says his complaint was that the peer - review process had been distorted to allow «extremely poor papers» to be published and points out that the journal's editor - in - chief and half the editorial board had resigned in protest.

The editor of the British Medical Journal (BMJ) resigned a professorship this week in protest of his university's decision to accept a $ 5.4 million handout from the tobacco industry.

Within hours of reading the paper last week, the plant scientist at the University of Freiburg in Germany resigned as an editor of the journal and asked for his name to be removed from its website.

Last week, the two editors - in - chief of the Croatian Medical Journal (CMJ) resigned after what they say are years of obstruction by members of the management board that made running the journal virtually impoJournal (CMJ) resigned after what they say are years of obstruction by members of the management board that made running the journal virtually impojournal virtually impossible.

With a tweet yesterday, an editor of Scientific Reports, one of Nature Publishing Group's (NPG's) open - access journals, has resigned in a very public protest of NPG's recent decision to allow authors to pay money to expedite peer review of their submitted papers.

The editor - in - chief of the journal Remote Sensing has resigned over the publication of a paper questioning the reliability of climate models.

Yesterday (March 2), Eric Brevik, the executive editor of one of the two EGU journals, SOIL, announced he was resigning.

In an undated letter this week, Geoderma editors announced that Cerdà had resigned from the journal's editorial board, and that someone cleared of citation boosting also resigned:

On February 13, the European Geosciences Union (EGU) announced that an editor at two of its journals had resigned following an investigation by the EGU and its publishing arm, Copernicus, into citation - boosting.

Thirteen scientists whom they cited issued a rebuttal and several editors of the journal Climate Research resigned because of the «flawed peer review».

A tipster forwarded us emails from Eduardo Garin, editor in chief of the journal, saying he had resigned from the journal after it refused to retract the paper, despite the fact that its sole reviewer was a frequent collaborator of the author.

The case had some major fallout: Cerdà resigned from two journals and the editorial board of Geoderma, additional editors resigned from their posts, and a university launched an investigation.

Garin confirmed to us that he resigned after the publisher refused to retract or correct the Morris article; however, Xiu - Xia Song, vice director of the editorial office at Baishideng, told us by email that Garin is still the journal's editor.

So hot, questions about a reviewer's potential conflict with the author of an article promoting circumcision prompted a journal editor to resign, and one academic to call another a «fanatic.»

the editor of the journal (published by Springer Nature), sent an email to Salzberg and the researchers who had threatened to resign if the paper wasn't retracted, saying:

Monday morning, Richard White, the editor of the journal (published by Springer Nature), sent an email to Salzberg and the researchers who had threatened to resign if the paper wasn't retracted, saying:

The study also failed to address previous research that had debunked similar claims; it was the failure to catch this fact during peer review that led the editor of the journal Remote Sensing to resign, saying he took responsibility for publishing a paper that «should not have been published.»

The Honolulu Biennial cut ties completely after the first report of the allegations, and days later, three editors resigned from The Exhibitionist, a journal about curatorial practices that Hoffmann founded in 2009.

Multiple emails sent to Michaels asking whether he'd been aware this was why the editors resigned, before he composed the Wall Street Journal op - ed, did not elicit a response.

Various other scientific groups pointed out several flaws in the methods and assumptions in each of their publications, and in fact one editor resigned because he felt his journal had failed its task of conducting rigorous peer - review in publishing a fundamentally flawed 2011 Spencer and Braswell paper (black in the first graphic).

I'm sure you know very well that peer review is by definition gatekeeping; in this case it's closing the gate against pieces of junk * scholarship * like that from McKitrick or the example that the hacked emails were talking about, the execrable Soon & Baliunas paper whose publication resulted in half a dozen editors resigning from the journal in protest.

After finding the paper's methods and assumptions had been flawed, six of the journal's editors resigned.

Dissenting scientific views are now jack - booted through tactics like pressuring scientific journals to not publish papers with which they disagree... even getting journal editors to resign.

He'd earlier been reportedly taking money from the American Petroleum Institute and he and Sallie Baliunas had a paper discredited in the journal Climate Research (it was so bad, the editor resigned in protest).

This week, three editors of Climate Research resigned in protest over the journal's handling of the review process that approved the study; among them is Hans von Storch, the journal's recently appointed editor in chief.

WASHINGTON — A science journal editor who recently published an article questioning whether industrial emissions are driving up the earth's temperature has resigned, saying he was not allowed to publish an editorial repudiating the article.

A few months ago, another journal's editor resigned over a paper that should not have been accepted due to a poor peer review process.

The editor - in - chief of a climate science journal has resigned in response to an academic controversy triggered by his publication of a paper co-authored by a leading climate sceptic.

The editor of a science journal editor which recently published an article questioning whether industrial emissions are driving up the earth's temperature has resigned, saying he was not allowed to publish an editorial repudiating the article.

It is well known that there have been some glitches in the peer review: a paper by Soon and Baliunas (2003) caused the resignation of several editors from the journal Climate Research (Kinne 2003), and Wagner (Wagner et al. 2011) resigned from the editorship of Remote Sensing over the publication of a paper by Spencer and Braswell (2010).

Not only did Wagner feel pressured into resigning as the editor of the journal, but he found it necessary to issue a groveling public apology to TRENBERTH of all people, who had nothing to do with the journal, the reviews, etc..

Half of the journal's editors resigned over poor quality control in mid-2003.

Six of the journal's editors resigned over the publication of this paper.

The editor and publisher of the ABA Journal, Edward A. Adams, announced today that he is resigning, effective May 27.

Open Medicine: New Standards of Access and Independence Anita Palepu, Editor, Open Medicine «Presents the experience of founding a new independent open access medical journal in the wake of a controversial instance of editorial interference and suspension of academic freedom that had resulted in the firing of the Canadian Medical Association Journals editors, followed by the resigning of the remaining editors and board.»