Sentences with phrase «journal editorial last»

More than half (52 %) of Silicon Valley entrepreneurs are immigrants, wrote Paul Kedrosky and Brad Feld in a Wall Street Journal editorial last Wednesday.

In a remarkable expression of business interests» frustration with the House anti-reform stalwarts, a Wall Street Journal editorial last week criticized their obsession with border security as «a case of the Republican Party letting its blood - and - soil wing trump its supposedly free - market principles.»

Not exact matches

Although an editorial in the journal Nature last year recalled that prior administrations have also been accused of tinkering with scientific independence, it noted that «some of the recent developments are disturbing.»

► «Last month, BioMed Central, an open - access publisher, announced that in 2015 it will launch the journal Research Involvement and Engagement, which will closely collaborate with patients in all aspects of its editorial processes, including peer review,» Dalmeet Singh Chawla wrote on Wednesday.

Six reports and an editorial published in the 11 February issue of The New England Journal of Medicine add to the earlier evidence reported last August that the syndrome is rare.

He also reviews manuscripts for five journals and last year was invited to sit on the editorial board of the open - access journal PLoS One.

Last month, BioMed Central, an open - access publisher, announced that in 2015 it will launch the journal Research Involvement and Engagement, which will closely collaborate with patients in all aspects of its editorial processes, including peer review.

Dr. Sauer has about 60 publications in peer - reviewed journals over the last five years, and is a member of various international editorial boards and sits on a number of scientific steering and advisory committees of international organizations and companies in systems biology and biotechnology.

One of that biologist's colleagues at Hopkins has already resigned from the journal's editorial board over its decision to correct (and not retract) the paper; last week, another 21 people told the journal they'd do the same.

That is what three editorial board members tried to figure out after the journal, Global and Planetary Change, faced heavy criticism for publishing the controversial paper last year.

Dr. Ornish published an editorial in the American Journal of Cardiology last year that I think really sums up where we are, describing a growing convergence of scientific evidence that an optimal diet is mostly plant - based.

This month in the journal Academic Medicine yet another editorial was published decrying the sorry state of nutrition knowledge in medical education, a problem diagnosed yet untreated for the last 50 years.

For example, my post last week concerned itself with the situation in Philadelphia, and I included a letter to The Wall Street Journal from Ms. Weingarten, who was responding to an editorial critical of the Philadelphia Teachers Union.

The Journal editorial board applauds state Rep. Barbara McLachlan, D - Durango, for her bill introduced last month to hold future mine operators responsible for water contamination caused by their...

So with the understanding that I sure as hell know what pervasive influence peddling can do to the process of peer review — because the pharma companies do actively recruit their «key opinion leaders» on the basis of things like editorial clout and that prominence within their specialty which gives them to hold responsibilities in peer review for «high impact» medical journals — you might appreciate why, when I got to read those e-mails in the FOI2009.zip archive last November, my immediate desire was for something brutally Sicilian to happen immediately and with spatter marks on the surrounding walls to the C.R.U. correspondents who had been concerting to infest and pervert the peer review process throughout the physical sciences wherever anything critical of the AGW hypothesis might be brought into publication.

The Wall Street Journal editorial board was entirely correct yesterday when they said, «Republicans have spent the last year cutting taxes and regulations, which hasn't been easy.

Richard Lindzen, professor of meteorology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in an editorial last April for The Wall Street Journal:

Do an editorial page search of a certain business journal's archive from last decade and we're pretty sure you'll find numerous rants about how naive Treehuggers «keep pushing those «uneconomical» and «naive» technology ideas like wind and solar power».

The WSJ Guide to Climate Change [editorials and op - eds] The Wall Street Journal, last updated 11 January 2010

For example, Elsevier allows for the final peer - reviewed draft to be posted immediately on acceptance, while Taylor and Francis has an 18 - month embargo on authors» archiving (although their journals in Library and Information Science have managed to reduce that to immediate posting on acceptance, as became clear after the editorial board of one of their journals resigned last week in protest over the APC).

The fundraising rounds by both Logikcull and Everlaw (the last being led by the well - known venture capital firm, Andreessen Horowitz) to me represent the realization in law of Marc Andreessen's statement in his Wall Street Journal editorial that «software is eating the world» and his expectation that «many more industries to be disrupted by software, with new Silicon Valley companies doing the disruption in more cases than not.»