Sentences with phrase «judge orders mother»

This week we will review: Judge Orders Mother to Stop Putting Father's E-mails in the Junk Folder, and Other Things, and Appeal Court Rules on Privacy of Text Messages.

In Toronto, a Canadian judge ordered the mother of a 29 - month - old girl to adjust her breastfeeding schedule or begin pumping so her biological father could spend time with the girl.

Initially, the Chambers judge ordered the the mother to have full child custody of the children and the children were to have supervised parenting time with the father on the weekends.

The judge ordered mother and daughter to meet with father's PAS expert to facilitate the father / daughter reunification.

Not exact matches

It found that 27 percent of the women were ordered into the facilities by an array of state employees: judges, probation officers, school truancy officials, social workers, doctors at psychiatric hospitals, or officials at state - funded shelters for unwed mothers and their babies.

API's position in this regard is not to judge mothers» decisions in choosing an elective caesarean, but rather that mothers and fathers be given accurate research - based information on the risks and benefits of elective c - sections in order to make an educated and informed choice.

Three months after a 6 - year - old boy was returned to the custody of a Champaign mother who practices extended breast - feeding, the Department of Children and Family Services is asking a judge to order the mother to prohibit the boy from sleeping in her bed.

In order to be gentle, these ideas need to develop slowly, and the mother needs to be willing to judge each situation individually.

So, please don't judge or make critical comments about bottles and formula, or whatever any mother chooses to use in order to survive.

This altercation led to a September 8 order from Johnson County District Judge Daniel Bryan prohibiting Heidemann from contacting his sister, visiting her home or visiting their mother's home.

State District Judge Samuel C. Kiser of Amarillo handed down a ruling last month that ordered a Mexican - American mother to «take any and all steps necessary» to ensure that her daughter learns English.

Some mothers who are practicing attorneys say they face an unforgiving environment in top law firms — the very places where judges - in - waiting are groomed — requiring them to prioritize work over family in order to advance.

Realistically, however the only alternative is for this court to acquiesce in the mother's blatant disregard for the orders of this court and to accept that notwithstanding that previous judges have concluded that contact between the children and their father accords with their welfare interests, the prospect of such contact occurring must be abandoned.»

Moreover, the trial judge also imposed a five - year restraining order on him, blocking him from contacting or going near the mother, the child, and members of the mother's extended family.

A Michigan judge on Tuesday rescinded an order giving joint custody to a father accused of raping the boy's mother when she was 12.

A judge in the Court of Session refused to grant the specific issue order and residence order sought by the mother after ruling that it would be in the five - and - a-half year - old girl's «best interests» to remain here.

The motion Judge found that the mother «had effectively abdicated her parental authority on the issue of access» and found her in contempt of the access order.

Crucial to this determination was Judge Merrick's view that the father was refusing to pay in order to inflict psychological harm on the mother.

It was held by the Court of Appeal that the Judge should have made an order for return pending the father obtaining proof that the mother and children would be sufficiently accommodated, as well as injunctive orders being obtained in advance.

Even under these circumstances, the judge followed through with his decision to adopt the psychologist's recommendations and ordered the immediate transfer of primary physical custody of the parties» child to Father with reasonable visitation for Mother.

The OCJ judge signed the mother's draft order, stating:

The ONCA further pointed out that 15 months had passed from the making of the trial judge's order and the appellant mother had not sought to tender any fresh evidence that the current joint regime was not working.

The trial judge had ordered the mother to return with the children to Egypt such that the custody issue could be decided there.

With respect to (4) and (5), the ONCA set aside the motion judge's lump sum spousal support order, without prejudice to the mother's right to bring another motion for lump sum support, noting that the motions judge's analysis on this issue was lacking and that his approach supported the conclusion that the underlying purpose of his lump sum spousal support award was merely to convert the mother's unpaid equalization payment into lump sum spousal support following the father's bankruptcy.

However, the ONCA affirmed the motion judge's conclusion that the father still had to pay child support to the mother for those eight months when the daughter was living with him full time because there was evidence that the father had influenced the daughter to live with him despite the existing court orders providing that her primary residence was with her mother.

[Had there been a contempt finding, the motion judge could have ordered the father to pay an amount of money to the mother pursuant to Rule 31 (5)(c) of the Family Law Rules.]

Some judges, whom I applaud, have started using criminal contempt as a sanction against mothers who repeatedly interfere with a father's court - ordered visitation.

The Arizona Court of Appeals must consider the possibility that, had the trial judge done so, it may have resulted in a different outcome.The Arizona Court of Appeals also found that the order for supervised parenting time on the part of Mother was based (per court documents) on the best interest of the children.

The motion judge found the mother in contempt in relation to an access order.

In the end, however, the court was unable to conclude that this error materially affected the trial judge's decision that granting the mother custody of the children was in their best interests, and the ONCA declined to order a new trial.

The SCJ judge seized himself of both matters and ultimately made an order in favor of the mother, largely on the basis of a s. 54 assessment.

Both of the husband's arguments were rejected, with the court noting that OCL reports do not bind trial judges, and that the trial judge was correct in noting that the court could not make an order affecting the wife's mother's interest in the matrimonial home without the wife's mother being a party to the proceeding.

As Ms. Label argued, it was a contradiction in terms, and legal error, for the trial judge to state that M will be damaged by continuing in her mother's custody, but to order that she remain in exactly that situation.

Second, the chambers judge in this case ordered that the child be returned to Billings, Montana; however, the return of the child was subject to the father fulfilling certain conditions, namely: pay child support to the mother, pay spousal support to the mother, pay the costs associated with the mother's and child's return to Montana, provide the mother with suitable transportation and insurance to return to Montana, and pay the first and last month's rent for the mother's accommodation in Billings.

Yet many judges still favour mothers in cases where custody is being ordered by the court.

(1) Did the application judge err in awarding custody to the respondent as a consequence of the mother's breach of his order?

In this case, the motion judges» three factual findings of: (i) the need for the father to pursue lengthy custody and access litigation in order to have any relationship with his children; (ii) the mother's failure to pay anything toward the costs ordered by the Court of Appeal; and (iii) the fact that the mother thwarted the enforcement of the costs award by reneging on assurances she made to the court about her intent to pay the costs and not use bankruptcy to thwart that payment, ground the finding of prejudice.

And if you owe child support the first thing is the Mother has to dismiss the order of ask a judge to dismiss the order and say you have made a verbal agreement between the both of you and it should all work out.

Even in states that do not directly address breastfeeding, the judge could make an order permitting the mother to have more time with the child due to breastfeeding.

To that end, the law allows a mother to request temporary and permanent court orders of protection to protect both the mother and children from abuse, and a judge is required to consider domestic violence as a factor against awarding custody to an abusive husband.

By Andrew Feldstein Chatham - Kent Children's Services v. T. (R.) In this child protection matter, the respondent mother appealed an order of the trial judge, after the judge... Read more

On appeal, the mother sought to overturn the trial judge's order of a parallel parenting arrangement and the father sought to maintain it.

While the judge ordered primary care and control to the father, she did so on condition that the father hire a reunification expert and encourage access between the children and their mother....

The learned trial judge found that the children had been alienated from their mother by their father but, given Daniel's age at that time, the plaintiff's application for custody of Daniel was refused and the previous consent order that Daniel was to have access visits with his mother and attend counseling was set aside.

The judge gave one last chance to the mother, by way of a conditional residence order with residence transferring to the father should the mother interfere with contact between the children and him.

The Appellate Division affirmed the trial judge's order denying the father's request to have the mother and child returned to Middlesex County.