Our engineers are specifically trained to deal with pedestrian and car accidents so that the Court,
Judge and Jury gets a proper understanding of how the accident happened, and who's fault the accident is.
Not exact matches
How could McLain have
gotten a fair trial, Levine asked, when the
judge had allowed jurors to stand in the
jury box, eating food
and drinking coffee during testimony?
«I then did what a federal
judge does when a
jury is deadlocked
and issued an Alan charge trying to
get them to move on their positions.
Judge Valerie Caproni said it was very early to
get a note like this,»
and quickly sent the
jury back to work
and reminded them that they should «respectfully exchange views.»
The two alternatives now are to 1) appoint a new
jury and conduct a mini-trial before it goes to decide on the penalty (which could take months); or 2) the
judge could
get the prosecutors to agree to forgo the death penalty;
and the
judge could unilaterally impose life w / o parole or life, with parole after 25 yrs.
Get the narcissist out of your head as your
judge and jury right now,
and you'll find you feel significantly better, more optimistic, more creative,
and happier.
You tell them to «
get along» or you play
judge and jury, telling both sides what they should do.
A one - man
judge, jury and executioner, Judge Dredd first got the movie treatment in 1995 with Sylvester Stallone and Rob Schne
judge,
jury and executioner,
Judge Dredd first got the movie treatment in 1995 with Sylvester Stallone and Rob Schne
Judge Dredd first
got the movie treatment in 1995 with Sylvester Stallone
and Rob Schneider.
120 Beats Per Minute — the title evoking heart rates
and drum machines — won the Grand Prix, though there were some (including, perhaps,
jury head Pedro Almodóvar, to
judge from his comments at the post - ceremony press conference) who might've liked to see it
get the Palme.
This week, Samsung finally
got their turn to go on the offense after Apple made their case to the
jury and District Court
Judge Lucy Koh.
I tell clients all the time to call the right department,
and if the other person on the end of the phone sounds as though they are
judge,
jury and executioner,,, time for a bad connection (keep paper to crunch in the background)
and call back
and get someone who appears compassionate, I say this so the phone servicer can't note the file in a negative manner for the next call or department.
When I began my own career as a district court
judge, I made it a point to meet with every
jury in any case I tried so that I could answer their questions
and get their impressions on the trial process
and their role as a
jury.
The day after the
jury decided the case, the presiding
judge called me to say that it was his practice to meet with
juries after they finished their deliberations
and get their feedback on the trial, the
judge,
and the lawyers.
The Crown should ask the trial
judge to reconsider the Corbett ruling so that the
jury (or trial
judge in a
judge - alone trial)
gets a fair
and complete picture.209 Similarly, in a
jury case, a defence strategy centred on an attack on the credibility of the victim can affect an accused's successful Corbett application, potentially opening up his or her entire criminal record to cross-examination for credibility purposes.210
It is important to keep in mind that personal injury cases can be very complicated for a number of reasons, including determining which evidence is admissible
and how to
get all favorable evidence before the
judge or
jury.
Answer: Doing so will probably
get you kicked off of the
jury, plus at least a lecture from the
judge about violating your oath as a juror, a $ 250.00 fine,
and a court order to go home
and write a five - page essay on the importance of the Sixth Amendment.
The short answer, therefore, is that in England
and Wales a defendant can not be convicted on a charge that is not listed on the indictment, but a
jury can convict of any charge on the indictment if the
judge asks the
jury to retire
and consider a verdict - but the case may not
get so far as that, if a plea - bargain is struck.
«You're not doing the job for your client if you're not zealous to a fault, but you're not an effective advocate for them if you go before the
judge and jury and get in trouble because you're not forthcoming enough about discovery,» says Duffy.
He knows how to
get results from
judges,
juries and insurance companies.
That means being honest with the
judge, opposing counsel, oftentimes the insurance company representative (which I have found is always the person behind the scenes controlling the money decisions
and is the reason the case is going to trial; the powerful decision - maker who the
judge and jury never meet or even
get to know about),
and most importantly, the
jury.
We will use the information
and evidence we gather to (1)
get charges against you reduced or dropped, (2) negotiate plea agreements,
and / or (3) argue your case in front of a
judge or
jury.
When
judges ask for «critique» of a draft
jury instruction, they expect
and get extremely respectful responses.
Once the lawyers have fought over the instructions
and the
judge decides what will be presented, the
jury only
gets them in writing... in some states not even in writing, they only
get them read to them without a copy to take back to the room.
While
jury trials are the ultimate trial - court challenge, this is in fact a book that at its core is about shattering your view of yourself as an attorney
and getting you to realize how you really come across (to a
jury but also to the
judge and everyone else).
-LSB-...] The only way Oracle could counter such testimony is by calling
Judges O'Malley, Plager,
and Taranto as witnesses to tell the
jury that the Court
got it completely wrong,
and in fact that the declaring code
and SSO are copyrightable.
In order to
get clients the just compensation for their pain
and suffering, we work diligently to build a compelling case that
judges and juries can not deny.
When you step into court, you can do so with an attorney by your side who has decades of experience
getting results in front of a
judge and jury.
They tell me simple timeline visuals, rather than complex legal charts, are more helpful in
getting judges,
juries and mediators to understand their case evidence better, but also to remember it better.
A self - deprecatory statement will endear you to the
judge and jury,
and you can
get back on track.
I would argue that the combination of these two outcomes related to design patents doesn't make sense, but Apple's smartphone design patent case is strong enough that a
jury can find that way,
and the tablet design patent case is so strong that Apple may very well
get the
jury overruled either by
Judge Koh or on appeal.
And the end result of litigation, which
gets these cases resolved, one way or another, either by settlement, or a
jury verdict, or by
judge decision, is a trial.
For more great stuff, including why our
judges love the civil
jury system,
get the Center for Justice & Democracy's new BRIEFING BOOK, TORT LITIGATION
AND JURIES: BY THE NUMBERS.
And before Apple v. Samsung
gets there,
Judge Koh has to make her Rule 50 («overrule - the -
jury») decisions, but in the build - up to the trial,
Judge Koh was clearly reluctant, especially compared to
Judge Posner, to make summary judgment decisions instead of deferring to the
jury.
All those records
get created well before any
judge or
jury sees the case —
and they don't automatically go away or disappear, even if the case is eventually thrown out.
During a break in yesterday's trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, while the
judge and jury were out of the courtroom, Moussaoui shouted, «Burn in the U.S.A.» The outburst
got Norm Pattis hot under the collar.
When we talk about «walled gardens,» we focus on the obvious harms: an App Store makes one company the
judge,
jury and executioner of whose programs you can run on your computer; apps can't be linked into
and disappear from our references; platforms
get to spy on you when you use them; opaque algorithms decide what you hear (
and thus who
gets to be heard).