Sentences with phrase «judging by most of»

And judging by most of the blogs I read, I'm not alone!

Judging by most of the comments we get, the number of people lucky enough to get the NES and SNES Classic is going to be very small.

Judging by most of the post on these walls alot of people already do.

Not exact matches

Judging by my Twitter feed, most foreign observers simply can not understand why a man serving his country in one of its highest and most sensitive positions should step down over something that happened in his private life - something that directly affects only those involved and their families.

Nonetheless, the judge declared «consumer harm is not relevant» to competition policy; Sears broke the rules by selling tires at a lower price than its competitor most of the time.

In one of the most quoted parts of the speech, he spoke of his wish to see his children judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

To select its judges, Next 15 management didn't simply go with the most senior people in the organization; instead, they put up a diverse team selected on the basis of actually being good at judging such a competition: a panel defined not by job title, but by skill and expertise.

The World Justice Project ranked the US 18th in the world in its most recent rule - of - law rankings, judged by criteria like accountability, absence of corruption, respect for fundamental rights, and access to justice.

Weekly business magazine Challenges reported two weeks ago that Bollore, one of the most prominent figures on France's corporate landscape, had been summoned by judges investigating whether his advertising group Havas was involved in influencing elections in West Africa.

Judging by the sorry condition of other foundries (including four more also owned previously by Chromalloy), Elyria may be the most profitable one in the country today.

Yet judging by its school system — perhaps the most important indicator of a country's future economic performance — this Swedish model's looks appear to be fading fast.

Judging by the most shorted stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange between the March 29 and April 13 settlement dates, sellers were reducing their stakes ahead of earnings reports.

Sysco Corp. shares rose the most in nine months after its planned $ 3.5 billion takeover of US Foods Inc. was blocked by a federal judge, bringing relief to investors concerned about the company undertaking an ambitious merger.

Sysco Corp. climbed 3.1 percent, the most since September, after its planned $ 3.5 billion takeover of US Foods Inc. was blocked by a federal judge.

Judging by the need to penalise Guest Blogs and the fact that Amazon and Ebay occupy 90 % of most page 1 result sets, I would suggest not.

Conservative foundations, multinational oil companies and a prescription drug maker were the most frequent sponsors of more than 100 expense - paid educational seminars attended by federal judges over a 4 1/2 - year period, according to a Center for Public Integrity investigation.

While there are wonderful examples of kingdom communities who attract, embrace, and transform those who are most judged and marginalized by society and religion today, on the whole today's prostitutes and tax collectors steer as far away from Christians as they did the Pharisees in the first century.

-- like the Republican evangelicals who all think their church is the most Christian, the most right, the only ones going to heaven yet ignore the real teachings of Jesus by judging others, ignoring charity and the needs of their community, not understanding when the Lord's Prayer begins with «Our» Father — the «Our» is not just white people.

Most Convicting (nominated by Alise Wright): David Nilsen with «Coping with Disappointment When Calvinists Refuse to Be Jerks» «I think one of the problems with most of us who consider ourselves progressive Christians is that we live in constant expectation of being judged by our fellow believers who are more conservatMost Convicting (nominated by Alise Wright): David Nilsen with «Coping with Disappointment When Calvinists Refuse to Be Jerks» «I think one of the problems with most of us who consider ourselves progressive Christians is that we live in constant expectation of being judged by our fellow believers who are more conservatmost of us who consider ourselves progressive Christians is that we live in constant expectation of being judged by our fellow believers who are more conservative.

It was as if those who would be quite shocked if the essence of Christianity were judged by the faith's most perverse historical expressions had no qualms in doing just that to American civil religion.

Also I'm most of the time very good at judging others to some kind of standard that I expect people to live by, meaning I want to put them into religion or at least have some kind of control over them.

It reminds us that our most pressing constitutional questions (on slavery and secession) were settled out of court; that it took more than a wiser judge to reverse our most villainous chief justice (Roger Taney); and that our Constitution's most consequential interpreter wasn't a robed philosopher - king but a self - taught lawyer from Kentucky by way of Illinois.

John Kennedy repeatedly appointed segregationist judges to the federal bench in the South, and the civil rights case that Robert Kennedy most vigorously prosecuted involved charges brought against Albany, Georgia, activists for violating the rights of a white storeowner by boycotting his business because he had served on a jury that cleared the sheriff who had shot a black man three times in the neck at point - blank range.

Among the many positions taken by these critics, the argument most relevant to our present theme is that the rise of international institutions under the umbrella of the United Nations system represents the leading edge of a new global system of government that has superseded the state in important respects, including the right to judge when resort to armed force is legitimate.

First, I started trying to figure out which sort of people were most often criticized, judged, and condemned by the churches, Christians, radio shows, books, and articles I interact with.

Almighty God, Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, maker of all things, judge of all men: We acknowledge and bewail our manifold sins and wickedness, which we from time to time most grievously have committed, by thought, word, and deed, against thy divine Majesty, provoking most justly thy wrath and indignation against us.

That Gospel was by far was the most widely used early Christian book, to judge by the number of copies that have surfaced in the dry sands of Egypt, or by the number of quotations in early Christian writers, or by the number of textual corruptions introduced from Matthew into other Gospels by scribal copyists obviously more familiar with Matthew.

The first is that of a «fundamental theology»: What model will most adequately explicate the methods, criteria, warrants, backings and modes of argumentation by means of which one may genuinely judge any statement as a theological one?

Can we moderate Christians tell the world that most Americans don't believe that you should devote your energy to judging others, that you should try to focus to improving yourself; that most Americans want religion protected by keeping it separated from «State» rather than the extremist push to make biblical law the law of the land; that each individual's morality is between him / her and God, not a morality imposed by Christian extremists?

Then again, judging by the response of most people around us — including our families — you'd think I'd left it at the first statement...

William, I agree America was totally feminized by liberals and the most stupid, out - of - context chant, «do not judge.»

It was in fact the most vital, most inspiring religion in the whole world at that time; and if we are tempted to contrast it with Christianity, say with the religion of the gospel or with Christianity as it ought to be, let us add that Judaism is likewise to be judged by what it aimed to be, not by what it empirically was; and also, that Christianity owes a vast debt to Judaism - in fact, as we have already observed, the best in Judaism and the best in Christianity are not two religions but one, historically and essentially.

By his courageous heart, his valiant leadership against Philistia, and his faith that he is Yahweh's man, he achieves a position of strength and prominence among most of the tribes of Israel quite exceeding that of any previous «judge» but clearly short of full kingship.

Most of them, to judge by what I've seen of them and their advance notices, are by authors who want to change the subject - to what's wrong with church teaching on sexuality, to celibacy, to women's ordination, to democratizing decision making, to anything but fidelity.

Said passage is one of the few judged to be authentic by most contemporary NT scholars.

Son of the Most High's opinion isn't what you will be judged by, heck, God himself may not need to assert his divine authority; He may just use your own.

I swear - there are common sense Christians who live by faith and follow ALL HIS COMMANDMENTS and then there are the pick - and - choose, no - understanding, ignorant Christians who can quote a couple of Bible verses (turn the other cheek, thou shalt not kill and judge not being the most popular amongst your ilk) who LITERALLY have NO READING COMPREHENSION SKILLS AT ALL and for whom CLEARLY The Lord has not chosen to reveal the most basic of Biblical tenets.

But the notion of justice that is most lacking in North American society, and in the consciousness of Christians today, is substantive justice — justice that is judged by its results.

If a society is judged by the way it treats its most vulnerable members, we will reject the let's - kill - Alzheimer's - patients agenda out of hand and focus on improving our capacities to care.

I'm glad I know christians in real life, because if I had to judge them by their online presence, I'd say that christians are some of the most dishonest, hateful people I've ever had the displeasure of encountering.

Judged by the ideals of the Kingdom, most forms of visionary reason are deficient in ways that range from ignorance to idolatry.

My first hermeneutical assumption — and the most fundamental one — is that Jesus Christ is the bearer of God's invitation to human wholeness and is the focal point of God's humanizing action; hence, Jesus Christ is the central norm through which and by which all else must be judged.

Absolutely, it does make sense to at least 6 billion people on earth including but not limited to professionals and the elite such as Doctors, Scientists, Juries, Judges, Magistrates, Politicians, even by the person who holds the highest position of the most powerful country of the world.

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.

«50 So pervasive were these Societies that in 1850 a Unitarian minister, but by no means an enemy to evangelical sentiments, complained that «the minister is often expected to be, for the most part, a manager of social utilities, a wire - puller of beneficient agencies,» and his character is often judged «by the amount of visible grinding that it can accomplish in the mill of social reform... «51

This new component of SFWSC, the most respected and influential international spirits competition of its kind, features an all - star panel of judges, led by SFWSC's Director of Judging and leading bar professional, Tony Abou - Ganim, and including the likes of best - selling author and whiskey expert Fred Minnick and Ziggy Eschliman, award - winning radio and television personality and educator, who will blind taste cocktail recipes submitted by some of the industry's most respected leaders including author and beverage consultant Kimberly Haasarud and James Beard - honored cocktail historian, David Wondrich.

A further danger lies in these bad translations, because, to judge by the comments, many if not most of the readers of this blog do not live in Paris (or France), but simply visit, and so could be misled into believing that «tant pis» is not polite language.

He judges by looks as well as flavor, planting his most beautiful discoveries on two acres of land by his house in Napa.

Slated to be the biggest and most extensive blind tasting competition of rose wine in Asia, the Asian Rose Masters 2018 will be chaired by the Drinks Business Hong Kong editorial team and judged by an expert panel of professionals including Master Sommeliers, Master of Wines and senior trade buyers.

I have made it several times and it has always received rave reviews — and judging by the rest of the comments most others have had similar experiences.