Judging by your logic world class players simply don't have bad games?
Not exact matches
Besides, in a rhetoric ruled
by a
logic, testimony even conceived as a relation of transpired facts, occupies necessarily an inferior place, for it shows the dependence of the judgment and of the
judge with regard to something exterior: on the first level, the things spoken
by another, and on the second, things seen
by him.
We can rejoice that we are saved not through the immanent mechanisms of history and nature, but
by grace; that God will not unite all of history's many strands in one great synthesis, but will
judge much of history false and damnable; that He will not simply reveal the sublime
logic of fallen nature, but will strike off the fetters in which creation languishes; and that, rather than showing us how the tears of a small girl suffering in the dark were necessary for the building of the Kingdom, He will instead raise her up and wipe away all tears from her eyes» and there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying, nor any more pain, for the former things will have passed away, and He that sits upon the throne will say, «Behold, I make all things new.»
By this
logic Bloom would also have to be
judged innocent of charges of anti-Semitism because of the evenhanded character of his assault on orthodoxy and piety, whether Jewish, Christian or otherwise.
By that
logic «Cyanide» would actually be quite a pretty word, if you didn't know what it meant, but that did not do one Welsh mother much good when she intentionally tried to name her baby girl after the deadly poison, and a
judge said no freaking way.
Home secretary Theresa May's
logic was declared «irrational»
by a
judge in a judicial review earlier this week.
Using
logic reminiscent of Mario Cuomo, a reform advocate who nevertheless signed into law gerrymandered lines on the premise that they were preferable to lines drawn
by the courts, Benjamin laments that the
judge is «unelected» and therefore accountable for mistakes in the map he or she draws.
Much of the comedy of Bad Moms (Jon Lucas and Scott Moore, 2016)-- a film that is predicated on the very real, paralyzing fear mothers have about being not good enough to their kids (and being
judged by others for it)-- falls flat because it starts from an unbelievable place, pushes only some details to their extremes (not really abiding
by an «if x, then y»
logic), and lurches forth with its plot.
Now, using that
logic one can only come to two conclusions, either driveclub was unfairly
judged and scrutinized
by the gaming media or there was severe bias in giving HMCC a pass even though it was released just as broken as driveclub.
Can we really
judge the value of art,
by men or women,
by the crazy
logic of the market?
As recognized
by Judge Jackson, that
logic ignores basic principles of supply and demand.
This comes about from the natural tendency to
judge logic not
by whether the steps are sound but whether the conclusions fit the «known» facts.
While I empathize with Norm's tortured soul, his tortured
logic is a pathetic trap that plays into the dyskeptic arguments of people who can make any temperature record seem to mean anything they want
by simply abandoning the hard learned lessons of skepticism that tell us to
judge data
by signal: noise and appropriate statistical analyses.
By that
logic, fewer
judges would be needed to deal with more cases, reducing the cost of judicial salaries and pensions and the court estate.
The
logic applied
by the
judge in this decision also goes beyond a perception of bias toward an expert that the arbitrator has previously retained.
(
By the way,
logic would dictate that
Judge Martin would likely be replaced with a judge who's expected to respect the Guidelines from a political point of view and perhaps being a new judge, only recognizes a world in which Guidelines sentences exis
Judge Martin would likely be replaced with a
judge who's expected to respect the Guidelines from a political point of view and perhaps being a new judge, only recognizes a world in which Guidelines sentences exis
judge who's expected to respect the Guidelines from a political point of view and perhaps being a new
judge, only recognizes a world in which Guidelines sentences exis
judge, only recognizes a world in which Guidelines sentences exist....
Although I may not completely agree with their
logic here, you must remember that all the Court is saying is, this issue should be decided
by the jury, not the
judge.
A recent decision published
by Adams County
Judge Robert G. Bigham applies this law and
logic to IRA distributions, in Sealander v. -LSB-...]
By your
logic, someone on the other side might propose that no one should be allowed to be a defense attorney or a sentencing
judge until s / he's been violently raped, mugged, and had a family member killed.
The danger in the challengers»
logic is evidenced
by their bald assertion that these four
judges should be replaced because each is «A Democrat appointed
by a Republican governor — how much of a Democrat is that person really?»