Sentences with phrase «judgments from the court of»

Judgments from the Court of Appeal have been caught on camera since 2013 and a pilot filming judge's sentencing remarks in six crown courts will begin soon.

Notwithstanding our commitment to protecting our insureds from liability where appropriate, two judgments from the Court of Appeal will make it more difficult in future to establish limitation defences in solicitors» negligence cases.

Leading judgment from Court of Appeal on unfair prejudice petition in respect of a private equity LLP.

[34] In R. v Reitsma, supra, the Supreme Court of Canada, in adopting the dissenting judgment from the Court of Appeal, found that the qualified identification from a photographic line - up (witness stated the perpetrator looked similar to the perpetrator) coupled with an in - dock identification was not sufficient evidence to support a conviction.

BAILII publishes most significant judgments from the courts of the four jurisdictions of the UK and from the courts of Ireland since 1996, receiving regular feeds from the courts.

Not exact matches

To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to you.

In decisions from Roe through Casey, the Court has precisely left matters of life and death to the private judgment of individuals.

The laws governing the English, I discovered, have emerged from the judgments of the courts, and not been imposed upon the courts by government.

The Heather Blazing (1992), one of his early novels, opens with Eamon Redmond, a conscientious high court judge in Dublin, writing his last judgment of the term before joining his wife Carmel for summer vacation in the County Wexford, from which they hail.

Again Jesus moves from the overt act which a court of law might pass judgment on, to the inner disposition.

The opinions collected here» some dissenting from the majority of the Court, others concurring in judgment but rejecting the majority's reasoning» show how Scalia applies his textualism to these issues, and how it differs from competing theories of interpretation, most notably the «living Constitution» view favored by many on the left and the varieties of intentionalism favored by many conservatives and moderates.

The document from the Equality and Human Rights Commission follows the European Court of Human Rights judgment in four cases about religious rights in the workplace, one of which found that an employee suffered a breach of her right to religious freedom for being told not to wear a cross at work.

As previously disclosed, the Company received a final judgment in its favor for a total of US$ 1.9 million plus interest from the US District Court for the District of Arizona in January, 2016 related to an arbitral award of R$ 7.8 million, including interest and penalties, from a Brazilian arbitration panel.

After completing the necessary processes with the California Courts to enforce the judgment, the Company has received and presented definitive legal documents from the California Court to the escrow agent at the bank clearing the way for the release of funds and expects that the US$ 1.9 million will be released to the Company before the end of the month.

SCOTTSDALE, Arizona, January 14, 2016 / PRNewswire / — RiceBran Technologies (NASDAQ: RIBT and RIBTW)(the «Company» or «RBT»), a global leader in the production and marketing of value added products derived from rice bran, announced today that the US District Court for the District of Arizona has entered a final judgment in the Company's favor for a total of $ 1.9 million plus interest related to the Company's 2008 acquisition of its Brazilian subsidiary, Irgovel.

A jury having been waived, the lower court, Eastern District of Louisiana, found that the word «Tabasco,» as applied to pepper sauce, was generic and indicated quality, ingredients and place of origin of the pepper from which it was made and rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff for damages.

The following excerpt is taken from the judgment issued by the Supreme Court of Canada:

The motion brought before the court by Sheriff, requesting it to disqualify the other faction from appealing the judgment of the Appeal Court was heard and argued, but the court asked the counsels to submit written arguments before the next date of heacourt by Sheriff, requesting it to disqualify the other faction from appealing the judgment of the Appeal Court was heard and argued, but the court asked the counsels to submit written arguments before the next date of heaCourt was heard and argued, but the court asked the counsels to submit written arguments before the next date of heacourt asked the counsels to submit written arguments before the next date of hearing.

Our utter disappointment not only stems from the fact that the accused persons themselves, demonstrated considerable remorse but also there has been an overwhelming outpouring of both condemnation of their conduct and pleas for the court to be lenient in its judgment and avoid custodial sentence.

As I said previously, I will speak from a generic viewpoint, we must keep in mind that the «legislative framework» for election is a composite of four key authorities, namely and in order of hierarchical authority: The Constitution, the Electoral Act, judgments of courts of records particularly the Supreme Court; and the derivative guidelines for election approved by the election management body and l'm talking of INEC.

The governor, who said there was nothing wrong with the legal system in Nigeria, added that «in recent times, politicians like President Buhari are the ones responsible for the rot in the judiciary because of their desperation to use the courts to foist one party state on Nigerians with conflicting judgments from election tribunals.»

A final vote to convict may only come after receipt of a judgment from the Constitutional Court that «the acts, of which the President of Ukraine is accused, contain elements of treason or other crime.»

«The further suggestions in Lord Carey's statement that recent court judgments which have not upheld claims of unlawful discrimination against Christians in the workplace are a threat to the social order and a step away from barring Christians from any employment is scaremongering, and a desperate cry from those unrepresentative few who are trying to retain the kind of privileges for religion that have no place in our society.»

«We strongly belief that President Buhari, must be seen to be acting contrary to court decisions on the use of Military during elections as clearly stated in the rulings of Justice Aikawa of the Federal High Court, who in his judgment, restrained the President and Commander - in - Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and INEC from engaging the service of the Nigerian armed forces in the security supervision of elections in any manner whatsoever in any part of Nigeria, without the Act of the National Assecourt decisions on the use of Military during elections as clearly stated in the rulings of Justice Aikawa of the Federal High Court, who in his judgment, restrained the President and Commander - in - Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and INEC from engaging the service of the Nigerian armed forces in the security supervision of elections in any manner whatsoever in any part of Nigeria, without the Act of the National AsseCourt, who in his judgment, restrained the President and Commander - in - Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and INEC from engaging the service of the Nigerian armed forces in the security supervision of elections in any manner whatsoever in any part of Nigeria, without the Act of the National Assembly.

It is clear from the foregoing that this Government and the Attorney - General were clearly acting mischievously to politicize the excellent work of the Sole Judgment Debt Commissioner by connecting the NPP's Attorney - General who merely paid upon the consent judgment the Supreme Court had refused to quash by certiorari during the NDC 2 Government as a means of aborting the further investigations ordered by the Commissioner.

In the lead judgment, Justice Agimnullified the July 25, 2013 verdict of Justice Abdukadir Abdu - Kafarati of the Federal High Court in Abuja, who had made an order of perpetual injunction restraining the EFCC, the Inspector - General of Police and the AGF, from prosecuting Ubah with respect to the subsidy fraud allegations.

The Supreme Court in 2014 subsequently ordered Mr. Woyome to pay back the GHc 51 million fraudulently taken from the state, after Mr. Amidu challenged the legality of the judgment debt paid the businessman and two other companies; Waterville and Isofoton.

Basically Glasgow City Council owes East Renfrewshire Council more than # 600,000 and our Labour MP, Labour MSP and Labour Council have done nothing to get us this money from their Labour colleagues in Glasgow, despite a Court of Session judgment in early December 2008.

It is trite that an appeal does not operate as a stay of execution and a judgment creditor can not be stopped from enjoying the benefit of his victory at the court,» Ogundipe added.

This, despite a judgment of the High Court dated 14th September 2014 ordering that all my entitlements shall be paid with interest, together with my constitutional right to one saloon car respected; and that a receipt for all Social Security deductions from my emoluments should be given to me after the payment of my benefits to enable the SNNIT to ratify my SSNIT benefits?

They ought to be warned that their modus operandi will not lead to reasoned dialogue and reconciliation with me but may push me to invoke my right pursuant to Article 2 and 130 of the Constitution so that the Supreme Court may settle once and for all whether or not under Article 55 of the Constitution a political party can gag a citizen from defending, and upholding the Constitution demonstrated with a Supreme Court judgment simply because he is perceived to be a member of that political party.

The statement added, «The PDP may soon be squandering the big reprieve it secured from the profound judgment of the Supreme Court by declaring a «no - victor, no - vanquished», and dangling an unnecessary amnesty without sanctioning Senator Ali Modu Sheriff and his fake National Working Committee acolytes, to serve as a deterrent at the national level and as an example to state chapters.

However, confusion reigned from the time the people received the news of the Supreme Court judgment as arguments for and against took the center stage.

He described the court's judgment on the unlawful escape from custody of the 13 as «shambolic and theatrical,» and that it will have grave ramifications for law and order in the country.

``... Accordingly, by this court's separate decision, order, and judgment, dated April 12, 2012, the petition has been denied, and this court has declared that the formula prescribed in article III, § 4 of the New York Constitution does not forbid New York from increasing the size of the New York State Senate to 63 seats in 2012.»

Sumption secretly wrote to the court asking it to remove the paragraph from the Court of Appeal judgcourt asking it to remove the paragraph from the Court of Appeal judgCourt of Appeal judgment.

In a communiqué issued at the end of the PDPGF meeting, late Wednesday night in Abuja, the governors frowned at the refusal of the acting National Chairman, Prince Uche Secondus, to honour the judgment of an FCT High Court which last December ordered him to vacate office for any other person from the North - East zone.

Justice Jones Dotse in an interview said the Court was clear in ordering the removal of names of National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) card holders from the voters» register, settling a controversial debate over the judgment.

Reading the communiqué, Chairman of the forum and governor of Ondo State, Dr. Olusegun Mimiko, said: «We take cognizance of the judgment by the court in Abuja which ordered the acting chairman to vacate office for any other person from the North - East zone of Nigeria.

Suffolk lawmakers approved a last - minute resolution to borrow $ 7.8 million to pay off a court - ordered judgment against the county for blocking a private firm from installing solar panels in the parking lot of the Ronkonkoma LIRR station.

I am saying that the issues that emanated from the Court of Appeal appeared to be missing from the judgment; that is why I want to see the full judgment before coming to any conclusion.

Justice Abba Aji in his judgment said, since, evidences and exhibits presented before the court have shown that the elections in the said polling were marred with irregularities and the number of registered voters from the affected polling units if they were not disenfranchised can change the outcome of the election, the right thing to do is to have a fresh election in the polling units.

In a judgment dismissing the claim, Justice Rilwan Aikawa held that following the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its duCourt in the case of Attorney General of Ondo State vs Attorney General of the Federation and 36 Others (2002), that ICPC had a statutory duty to investigate allegations of corrupt practices made against any person or authority in Nigeria and that neither the claimants nor the court has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its ducourt has the discretion to stop a statutory agency of government from performing its duties.

The government asked the High Court to adopt a «closed material procedure» which would involve the claimants and their lawyers being excluded from the hearing of the case, and the issuing of a «closed judgment» which they would not be entitled to see.

He stated that he took the action following the favourable judgment he got from the Court of Appeal, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, on February 17.

During Justice Questions yesterday, the issue of votes for prisoners was raised on the back of the recent judgment from the European Court of Human Rights.

He said, «President Muhammadu Buhari has directed all relevant agencies to compile documents on names of all looters with a view to promptly enforcing the judgment of a Federal High Court in Lagos ordering the government to release to Nigerians information about the names of high ranking public officials from whom public funds were recovered.»

«We take cognisance of the judgment by the court in Abuja which ordered the acting chairman to vacate office for any other person from the North - East zone of Nigeria.

Cor filed a petition in state Supreme Court in Onondaga County seeking a judgment of $ 934,849 in back rent from Fort Schuyler Management Co. and an order evicting the film hub, formally known as the Central New York Hub for Emerging Nano Industries.

«In particular, the executive should, as a matter of urgency, purge itself of contempt of court by complying with the judgment of the Federal High Court delivered on December 2, 2016 which directed that Sheik Ibraheem Elzakzaky and his wife, Hajia Zeinab Elzakzaky be released from the illegal custody of the State Security Sercourt by complying with the judgment of the Federal High Court delivered on December 2, 2016 which directed that Sheik Ibraheem Elzakzaky and his wife, Hajia Zeinab Elzakzaky be released from the illegal custody of the State Security SerCourt delivered on December 2, 2016 which directed that Sheik Ibraheem Elzakzaky and his wife, Hajia Zeinab Elzakzaky be released from the illegal custody of the State Security Service.