Not exact matches
The creation of a new class - action division
in the Montreal
judicial district that will be devoted to hearing all
authorization demands is expected to both speed up and improve the management of cases by a select group of judges who are experienced and interested
in that area of law.
The reasonable expectation of privacy
in internet subscriber data created the need for specific
judicial authorization, Spencer argued, and a mere request by a police officer does not establish «lawful authority» to obtain subscriber data.
In that case, is it acceptable under s. 8 to lower the burden on the police in getting judicial authorization, to «suspicion» rather than «reasonable grounds» for belief that information or evidence is available at the place or from the person with respect to which / whom the warrant is sough
In that case, is it acceptable under s. 8 to lower the burden on the police
in getting judicial authorization, to «suspicion» rather than «reasonable grounds» for belief that information or evidence is available at the place or from the person with respect to which / whom the warrant is sough
in getting
judicial authorization, to «suspicion» rather than «reasonable grounds» for belief that information or evidence is available at the place or from the person with respect to which / whom the warrant is sought?
The Court conducted a constitutional assessment
in light of Section 8 [1] of the Charter and was guided by the Supreme Courts determination
in R. v. Vu, 2013 SCC 60, that there must be
judicial authorization for the search and the search must be conducted
in a reasonable manner.
A wiretap
authorization is the appropriate
judicial order that requires law enforcement to establish investigative necessity (with some exceptions)
in addition to probable cause.
Because the government has a legitimate interest
in conserving prosecutorial and
judicial resources
in districts with large numbers of immigration cases, and fast - track programs are rationally related to that interest, we conclude that the PROTECT Act's
authorization of these programs, and their implementation
in some but not all districts, does not violate Appellants» equal protection and due process rights.
To illustrate why this has been a concern, while the Fourth Amendment will require border officials to have reasonable suspicion to engage
in invasive search techniques such as strip searches, but do not need any cause or
judicial authorization to search the body or personal effects of a person at the border.
The Commissioner may seek ex parte
judicial authorization to intercept private communications (wiretapping) to assist the Commissioner
in investigating conspiracies with respect to prices, markets or customers, quantity or quality of production, or channels or methods of distribution, and
in investigations of bid - rigging and deceptive telemarketing.
E.F. brings an application
in the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench for
judicial authorization entitling her to access physician assisted death.
In circumstances where this generally occurs, it is not feasible to subject the «sniffer dog's» sniff to prior
judicial authorization.
Although both types of
judicial authorization require reasonable grounds, a wiretap
authorization also requires the police to establish investigative necessity — with some exceptions
in Canadian law that do not arise here.
The issue before the Supreme Court of Canada
in this case was whether a warrant to search a location automatically extends to computers found
in that location, or whether specific
judicial authorization is required
in order for computers to be searched.
In the first of these three Issues Papers («New Categories of Legal Services Providers» [80]-RRB-, the Commission sought feedback on whether persons (individuals, not companies or other organizations), referred to as «LSPs» should be allowed, via
judicial authorization and regulation, «to perform discreet and limited legal tasks with the goal of improving access to legal services.»
On this basis, specific
judicial authorization is necessary
in order for a computer to be searched:
As the respondent correctly points out, police may discover computers
in a range of situations and it will not always be appropriate to require specific, prior
judicial authorization before they can search those devices.
Response:
In the final rule, we state that the provision permitting disclosures without an authorization for judicial and administrative proceedings does not supersede other provisions in § 164.512 that would otherwise permit or restrict the use or disclosure of protected health informatio
In the final rule, we state that the provision permitting disclosures without an
authorization for
judicial and administrative proceedings does not supersede other provisions
in § 164.512 that would otherwise permit or restrict the use or disclosure of protected health informatio
in § 164.512 that would otherwise permit or restrict the use or disclosure of protected health information.
Comment: Some commenters said that the right to request restrictions should be extended to some of the uses and disclosures permitted without
authorization in § 164.510 of the NPRM, such as disclosures to next of kin, for
judicial and administrative proceedings, for law enforcement, and for governmental health data systems.
In the three decades federal law enforcement has been required to report to Parliament on the number of times it receives
judicial authorization to conduct electronic surveillance on individuals, its use has declined steadily.
The accused, Santiago Wong, was charged with maintaining an illegal gambling operation, based on surveillance footage from a camera placed
in his hotel room by police without prior
judicial authorization.