Sentences with phrase «judicial council issued»

The Canadian Judicial Council issued an equally short and taciturn statement the following day.

After appointing a special committee to investigate the complaint, the 5th Circuit Judicial Council issued a curt, three - page order in September 2007 reprimanding Kent and admonishing him that his behavior was inappropriate for a judge.

One day after the Canadian Judicial Council issued its recommendation to not remove Justice Michel Girouard from the bench — despite a suspicious video of an alleged drug deal — a legal academic is pointing to a glaring lack of independence for judicial misconduct and a possible double standard.

Not exact matches

For example, in 1994 the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association issued an opinion holding that it is «ethically permissible» to use «the anencephalic neonate» as an organ donor, even though, as the Council recognized, under current law anencephalic babies are not dead.

Citing a similar case in which the Supreme Court ruled that the President was not bound by the advice of the Council of State, Yaw Oppong stated that, it was however vital that the President is seen to have sought the advice of the Judicial Council on the issue, as stated by the Constitution.

That is according to the Judicial Council which issued a statement on Monday...

Student Judicial Committee members must be elected to the Joint Student Council with plurality and can not be on probation for academic reasons or have been issued a sanction by the Student Judicial Committee.

Perhaps not surprisingly, this issue was decided in 1897 by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council when the federal government challenged upstart Ontario's power to award QCs.

As to the first issue, the ECJ agreed with the EP that, contrary to what the Council claimed, the decision could not be based on Article 82 (1)(d) TFEU (judicial cooperation), as none of the provisions of the agreement envisages a facilitation of judicial cooperation.

The Ontario Judicial Council has issued a 30 - day suspension to a judge who wore a «Make America Great Again» hat in court.

These decisions led to the formation of the Joint Legislative Council Special Committee on Judicial Discipline and Recusal («Special Committee») to study the two issues and recommend legislation to the full Legislature.

In parallel, the judicial commission of the States Council also submitted a «postulat» in March 2016 requesting the Federal Council to elaborate a report on the issue of the privilege for in - house lawyers and to come up with solutions, for instance, in the framework of the future revision of the Swiss Civil Procedure Code or the Swiss Criminal Procedure Code.

HB 1217 Requires meetings of judicial council be publicized 10 days prior to occurring and be open to allow any member of the public to speak on any issue.

The issue of balancing the right of the public to open courts with the right of an individual to privacy was tackled in 2003 in a discussion paper by the Canadian Judicial Council Judges Technology Advisory Committee (JTAC) titled «Open Courts, Electronic Access to Court Records, and Privacy».

One of the issues of the inquiry will likely explore further is Douglas» disclosure in the judicial application process, as well as what information members of the council had at the time she was considered for judicial appointment.

The Canadian Judicial Council has announced an inquiry committee will be held under the Judges Act about Justice Frank Newbould of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice over complaints that he made comments and wrote letters on an ongoing land claim issue in Sauble Beach where his family has owned a cottage for 100 years.

The real issue in this decision was what the appropriate sanction should be, especially since the Ontario Judicial Council stated in their 2002 decision of Re Baldwin,

Judicial Notice of Adjudicative and Nonadjudicative Facts on Appeal, Appellate Issues, Journal of the ABA Council of Appellate Lawyers (Fall 2015)

Importantly, because the challenge by Professor Corbally to the constitutionality of the Medical Practitioners Act 2007 and its compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights was not determined pending the judicial review of the Medical Council's decision, the lack of appeal issue remains open.

Law Society of Upper Canada: Called to the Bar in 1992 Ontario Labour Management Arbitrators Association, Member ADR Institute of Ontario, Member Canadian Bar Association ADR Section, Executive Committee Member (2014 - 2015) Ontario Bar Association, Member of Council (2010 - 2014) Ontario Bar Association Foundation, Member, Board of Directors (2014 - 2017) Society of Ontario Adjudicators and Regulators (SOAR), Board of Directors (2016 - 2017) and Advocacy and Innovation Committee (2015 - present) ADR Institute of Ontario, Professional Development Committee (2015 - 2017) Canadian Bar Association, Judicial Issues subcommittee (2017 - present)

And in case you were thinking this may sound somewhat familiar, the Canadian Judicial Council tackled this issue in its 2005: Use of Personal Information in Judgments and Recommended Protocol (PDF).

We emphasize that this does not deprive the judge of a remedy where procedural or fairness issues arise in an inquiry, just that the sui generis judicial conduct process under the Judges Act has built into it a mechanism (by way of appeal from the Committee to the Council at the end of the inquiry process) to address those issues through the Council which is itself a superior court.

Michalak v General Medical Council [2017] UKSC 71 is an interesting case, involving both a narrow point of statutory interpretation and broad issues about the nature of judicial review of administrative action.

[11] The American Medical Association's Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs has issued an opinion stating, «The physician should not reveal confidential communications or information without the express consent of the patient, unless required to do so by law [and] subject to certain exceptions which are ethically and legally justified because of overriding social considerations.»

The exchanges of judges are obviously one of the privileged means to reach that goal and, therefore, we present you in this issue of our Newsletter the Resolution on the training of judicial staff which was adopted by the European Union Council on October 24th, 2008.

AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, «Opinion E - 5.05: Confidentiality,» Issued December 1983, Updated June 1994.

That the Canadian Judicial Council consider conducting a seminar at its next mid-year meeting to review urgent security issues identified in [the report].

Judicial warning on the dangers of consensus have already been voiced by Mr Justice Ryder in Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council v GW and Others [2007] EWHC 136, para 94: «An over-riding desire to promote agreement can lead to key issues being obscured and thereby not investigated by the court.»

Screenings and Assessments Used in the Juvenile Justice System: Evaluating Risks and Needs of Youth in the Juvenile Justice System (PDF - 394 KB) Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts, Center for Families, Children and the Courts (2011) Reviews screening and assessment instruments and summarizes issues related to instrument validation, selection, and administration.

Our San Diego Superior Court family court website includes links to the state and local rules of court, courtroom judicial assignments and telephone numbers to court clerks and various administrative offices, hearing calendars, a video designed to familiarize parents with the Family Court Services mediation process that is required when there are child custody or visitation issues, Judicial Council pleadings forms, and an index of cases filed in the San Diego Superior Court during the last several judicial assignments and telephone numbers to court clerks and various administrative offices, hearing calendars, a video designed to familiarize parents with the Family Court Services mediation process that is required when there are child custody or visitation issues, Judicial Council pleadings forms, and an index of cases filed in the San Diego Superior Court during the last several Judicial Council pleadings forms, and an index of cases filed in the San Diego Superior Court during the last several decades.

She has presented on family law issues to a variety of attorney and mental health organizations as well as California Bernard Witkin Judge's College, Los Angeles Superior Court Family Court Judges, and California Judicial Council's Center for Judicial Education and Research.