Sentences with phrase «judicial court in a case»

Megan Deluhery's win for her client before the Supreme Judicial Court in a case involving legal malpractice was featured in a page one article in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.

He recently authored an amicus curiae brief to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in a case of great economic significance to condominiums, in which the right of associations to impose successive liens on owners who withhold condominium fee payments was upheld by the SJC.

Not exact matches

The judicial system does not track civil cases filed in circuit court by the section of law cited, but he does not remember hearing of any lawsuit based on the disparagement law being filed in circuit court anywhere in South Dakota.

Non-judicial foreclosures are generally faster and easier for lenders to execute than the judicial process, which involves a court, along with lawsuits and appeals in some cases.

Whether these safeguards are being properly applied — particularly as to keeping victims informed on each step in a case — is a timely question for the Legislature and for the Supreme Court, which oversees the judicial system.

The chances that choice will pass the test in these cases will vary according to the particular constitutional language, the local judicial precedents, and the composition of the state court at the time; but in every case there will be two commonalities of theory that are worth noting.

In such cases, we can either settle the issue by violence, or we can set up some authority to decide the matter, in which case we get judicial authority, of which the paradigm is the court or the judgIn such cases, we can either settle the issue by violence, or we can set up some authority to decide the matter, in which case we get judicial authority, of which the paradigm is the court or the judgin which case we get judicial authority, of which the paradigm is the court or the judge.

Scalia insists repeatedly that malleable judicial standards» reflected not only in the Court's appeals to evolving social norms, foreign courts, and living documents, but also, in some cases, in its reliance on authorial intent» give the Court carte blanche to impose its arbitrary will.

Two centuries of judicial interpretation of the United States Constitution have demonstrated that when the Supreme Court veers off course in a particular case or series of cases, continued constitutional litigation over the issue involved serves to correct their heading.

Whatever Marbury was supposed to mean about the scope of the power of judicial review, it is a notable fact that the Court declined to exercise that power to declare another act of Congress to be unconstitutional until 1857, when it ruled in the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford.

According to the standard account of the matter, the power of judicial review — that is, the authority of the federal judiciary to invalidate acts of Congress and the President when they are deemed to be unconstitutional — came to be entrenched in our law by the acceptance, tacit or otherwise, of the Supreme Court's ruling in the 1803 case of Marbury v. Madison.

However, on Tuesday, France's highest court for judicial matters, the Court of Cassation, ruled an undercover police officer's actions in the case had been unlawful, and ordered the Paris Court of Appeal to look again at the investigation's valicourt for judicial matters, the Court of Cassation, ruled an undercover police officer's actions in the case had been unlawful, and ordered the Paris Court of Appeal to look again at the investigation's valiCourt of Cassation, ruled an undercover police officer's actions in the case had been unlawful, and ordered the Paris Court of Appeal to look again at the investigation's valiCourt of Appeal to look again at the investigation's validity.

While making his intent known, he said, as a believer in the judicial system of the country, he would prosecute the case and go ahead with an appeal before the appellate court.

While the court resolved that the case instituted by the former First Lady did not constitute an abuse of judicial process, it resolved that the actions of the EFCC complained of by her did not constitute a violation of her rights and that she was not entitled to any of the six reliefs sought in the suit.

As a Supreme Court Justice, Judge Fahey was assigned to handle a civil calendar as well as criminal Special Term and presided over a variety of cases in Erie County as well as the outlying counties in the Eighth Judicial District.

Kareem argued that, going by numerous judicial authorities, some of which he cited on Wednesday, the development implied that Justice Tsoho's court had been robbed of jurisdiction to continue to conduct proceedings in the case until the Court of Appeal determined the fresh motion for stay beforcourt had been robbed of jurisdiction to continue to conduct proceedings in the case until the Court of Appeal determined the fresh motion for stay beforCourt of Appeal determined the fresh motion for stay before it.

While suggesting plethora of statistics and judicial decisions especially a 2014 English Court of Appeal judgment where it was stated that «cases take up to a generation to be resolved in Nigeria occasioned by catastrophic delays,» Osinbajo said stakeholders must now resolve to address the issue of delay once and for all in the collective interest of all.

Citing a similar case in which the Supreme Court ruled that the President was not bound by the advice of the Council of State, Yaw Oppong stated that, it was however vital that the President is seen to have sought the advice of the Judicial Council on the issue, as stated by the Constitution.

Stevens supported his argument by citing Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., [39] where the Court held that $ 3 million in independent expenditures in a judicial race raised sufficient questions about a judge's impartiality to require the judge to recuse himself in a future case involving the spender.

(3) Neither the Executive Committee nor the County Leader shall designate, nominate or propose any candidate for judicial offices which are to be elected county - wide in New York County, or which are to be proposed for appointment by the Mayor of the City of New York or by the Governor of the State of New York, exclusive of recommendations for interim appointment by the Mayor or the Governor, unless such candidate shall have been approved in that calendar year for such office by the independent panel., except that once a candidate for the office of Justice of the Supreme Court has been reported as highly qualified by at least two of the last four independent screening panels for that office, that candidate shall be considered as having been approved by the panel for such office during each of the four calendar years after the year in which the candidate shall have last achieved such status, (not counting a year in which there are no vacancies for the office of Justice of the Supreme Court other than a vacancy resulting from the expiration of the term of office of a justice eligible for and seeking re-election to that office, or a vacancy which has been filled by an interim Supreme Court justice seeking re-election who has been appointed by the Governor and who satisfies the requirements of sub-paragraph 4 (b), provided in each case that such justice has been determined by the independent panel to merit continuation in office), and such candidate shall not make application to the panel during any of such years unless the Committee on the Judiciary shall require the candidate to make such an application.

In all the other Cases before mentioned [within the judicial power of the United States], the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.»

As as the Dutch Supreme Court confirmed in 2003 («Waterpakt» case»), EU states have a separation of executive and judicial powers.

The statement added, «The EFCC boss expressed concern over the delay usually experienced in dispensing corruption cases and the conspiracy (in some cases) between the criminals and judicial workers / law enforcement agents to make violators of law escape justice, citing the case of a former governor of Adamawa State, Bala Ngilari, who was set free with the connivance of a prison warder and court registrar after being convicted by court.»

In the case of the Supreme Court vacancy, the Judicial Delegates, also elected by Democratic voters in the Primary, then vote for the Democratic nominee from among the qualified candidates at a judicial conventioIn the case of the Supreme Court vacancy, the Judicial Delegates, also elected by Democratic voters in the Primary, then vote for the Democratic nominee from among the qualified candidates at a judicial conJudicial Delegates, also elected by Democratic voters in the Primary, then vote for the Democratic nominee from among the qualified candidates at a judicial conventioin the Primary, then vote for the Democratic nominee from among the qualified candidates at a judicial conjudicial convention.

Since the case is going to the Appeal court for further judicial review, it is now time to allow the judges to perform their constitutional roles before we further engage in distractive media trial over a simple legal matter.

Recall that a Federal High Court in Abuja had taken its final decision on the corruption case involving Justice Ngwuta, pointing out that the prosecution in the Justice Ngwuta's case failed to comply with the condition precedent before bringing charges against a judicial officer.

The statement read in part, «The National Judicial Council's committee on the monitoring of alleged corruption cases in court has resolved to actively engage prosecutorial bodies like the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission in furtherance of its mandate.

The National Judicial Council (NJC) Committee on the monitoring of alleged corruption cases in Court has resolved to actively engage prosecutorial bodies like the...

The district court subsequently said in its decision that the case brought up a «political» question that the other branches of government, not the judicial branch, should consider, but an appeals court reversed that ruling.

A preliminary injunction in the case is set to be held by Nevada's Second District Judicial Court on 22 November.

A californian environment group, the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, has asked the California Judicial Council to introduce rules that would force lawyers to use recycled paper to file cases in court

When the Supreme Court heard the case in 2009, it cautioned against judicial adventures in reforming educational institutions.

In a case with a long history, Julie Hancock & Others v. Commissioner of Education & Others, the commonwealth's Supreme Judicial Court firmly rejected claims that the education funding system violated the state's constitution.

That would mean that the documents like Constitution or Declaration of Human Rights would be interpreted differently in each case and lead to depending on the subjectivity of the court or the judge in individual matters and make judicial assessment as the primer source of the law.

Massachusetts 2020 and the Nellie Mae Education Foundation, along with education, civil rights and child advocacy leaders, submitted an amicus curiae brief to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in support of the plaintiffs in the Hancock vs. Driscoll school financing case.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard oral arguments in the case earlier this month.

Nevada's First Judicial District Court Judge James Wilson granted a preliminary injunction in the case of Lopez v. Schwartz earlier this month, halting the state's Education Savings Account Program (ESAP) established by Senate Bill (SB) 302.

Alexandria, Va. (November 24, 2015)- The National School Boards Association (NSBA), joined by the Nevada Association of School Boards (NASB), filed a «friend of the court» (amicus) brief in the First Judicial District Court of Nevada in the case of Lopez v. Schwartz, urging the Court to grant a preliminary injunction to halt the pre-registration process Nevada has initiated to use public funds to provide savings accounts for private educacourt» (amicus) brief in the First Judicial District Court of Nevada in the case of Lopez v. Schwartz, urging the Court to grant a preliminary injunction to halt the pre-registration process Nevada has initiated to use public funds to provide savings accounts for private educaCourt of Nevada in the case of Lopez v. Schwartz, urging the Court to grant a preliminary injunction to halt the pre-registration process Nevada has initiated to use public funds to provide savings accounts for private educaCourt to grant a preliminary injunction to halt the pre-registration process Nevada has initiated to use public funds to provide savings accounts for private education.

INDIANAPOLIS — The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice released the following statement in response to a ruling this afternoon by Eighth Judicial District Court (Clark County, Nev.) Judge Eric Johnson in a case challenging Nevada's education savings account (ESA) program, which has attracted more than 6,000 applications since its inception despite legal challenges preventing the accounts from operating.

In 2002, Frank Kemerer, regents professor of teacher education and administration at the University of North Texas, reviewed each state's case law and judicial climate in order to characterize the likely orientation of the courts if a voucher law were to be challengeIn 2002, Frank Kemerer, regents professor of teacher education and administration at the University of North Texas, reviewed each state's case law and judicial climate in order to characterize the likely orientation of the courts if a voucher law were to be challengein order to characterize the likely orientation of the courts if a voucher law were to be challenged.

«(a) COMPENSATION - The district court shall, subject to regulations approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States, establish the amount of compensation, if any, that each arbitrator or neutral shall receive for services rendered in each case under this chapter.

But in this case, the mortgage company can carry out an auction of the property rather than having the sheriff's office or local courts do it, which is what distinguishes it from a judicial foreclosure.

But if in this court case is found that NASA was not guilty or the court rejects the case altogether, will you change your mind on this topic, or will you cry that the judicial system also does not work properly?

Both were ruled by state regulators to be beneficial for Massachusetts ratepayers, but the project is overcoming court hurdles, with A D.C. appeals court case, a case before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, and a third in a federal district court remaicourt hurdles, with A D.C. appeals court case, a case before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, and a third in a federal district court remaicourt case, a case before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, and a third in a federal district court remaiCourt, and a third in a federal district court remaicourt remaining.

I urge you to buy the book, not so much because I need the money for my end of the case (which I do) but because when a sclerotic and dysfunctional judicial system co-operates with a cynical and fraudulent plaintiff in turning the DC courts into a 21st century version of trial by ordeal, it is more important than ever to push back by disseminating as widely as possible the opinions of him that Mann is trying to suppress.

A D.C. appeals court case, a case before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, and a third in a federal district court remaicourt case, a case before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, and a third in a federal district court remaiCourt, and a third in a federal district court remaicourt remaining.

His expertise also covers specialisms in Creative Arts & Cultural Industries, Human Rights, Judicial Review, Complex Commercial Litigation, Intellectual Property law, Privy Council cases - Ultimate Appeal Court for parts of the Commonwealth, as well as, Regulatory Cases & Inquicases - Ultimate Appeal Court for parts of the Commonwealth, as well as, Regulatory Cases & InquiCases & Inquiries.

On the basis of this case study if judicial review is not available, either in law; or because F does not have the knowledge or resources to fund an application; or if there can be no challenge to the Commission figure at the liability order stage, then F will be fixed with a sealed court document which, on the above facts, represents an unchallengeable misrepresentation of the true facts.

Hong Kong is also proud of its judicial independence (it is the leading Asian jurisdiction in this regard, according to the World Economic Forum's Global Competitiveness Report 2017 - 2018), although Mr Justice Fok, Permanent Judge of the Hong Kong Court of Final Court of Appeal, felt driven to provide a strong assertion and defence of the judiciary's independence during the UNCITRAL Asia - Pacific Judicial Summit, following allegations by some commentators that the judiciary had compromised its independence in respect of certain well - publicised cases (not connected with arbitjudicial independence (it is the leading Asian jurisdiction in this regard, according to the World Economic Forum's Global Competitiveness Report 2017 - 2018), although Mr Justice Fok, Permanent Judge of the Hong Kong Court of Final Court of Appeal, felt driven to provide a strong assertion and defence of the judiciary's independence during the UNCITRAL Asia - Pacific Judicial Summit, following allegations by some commentators that the judiciary had compromised its independence in respect of certain well - publicised cases (not connected with arbitJudicial Summit, following allegations by some commentators that the judiciary had compromised its independence in respect of certain well - publicised cases (not connected with arbitration).

Blog discusses civil litigation in the District of Columbia, including Court of Appeals cases, legislative news and judicial nomination updates.