Judicial Panels do not use technical rules of evidence.
Not exact matches
«The people on the
judicial screening
panels, the people on the committees, my counsels, whenever they were around her, they had testimonies from losing parties, «We didn't win our case, but the judge was very fair.»
Although s 37 of IA 2005 provides immunity from civil claims for inquiry
panel members, s 38 implicitly confirms that that immunity
does not serve to preclude
judicial review claims in respect of decisions made by a member or members of the inquiry
panel.
Other proposals include: appointing an independent layperson, instead of a judge, to head the selection
panels for the lord chief justice and the president of the Supreme Court; transferring the lord chancellor's
judicial appointment powers below either the High Court or the Court of Appeal to the lord chief justice; and restricting
judicial appointment commission involvement in selecting
judicial office holders who
do not require a legal qualification.
I take it the esteemed
panel either don't have much dealings with minority counsel or they're just oblivious to the accomplishments of minorities in the
judicial realm?