Not exact matches
Coincidently, I just read a free movement
of goods case again (Dynamic Media Vertrieb 244/06) and it although the case is quite different, the Court also highlights the importance
of judicial review by national courts
of decisions by authorities that
affect EU rights (in this case the right to market products in another MS).
From such an assessment
of the rules, the Court suddenly jumped to the conclusion that «in those circumstances, a
decision by which the Parliament considers that a petition addressed to it does not meet the conditions laid down in Article 227 TFEU must be amenable to
judicial review, since it is liable to
affect the right
of petition
of the person concerned.
While there are reasons to be concerned about consistency and fairness at both the leave stage and the merits stage
of judicial review, inconsistency at the leave stage
affects far more applicants, and the
decision - making process at the leave stage lacks even the modest accountability and transparency found at the merits stage.