Sentences with phrase «jury verdict review»

MODEL TRIAL SERIES and provides continuing monthly commentary for the MEDICAL LIABILITY ALERT and editorial reviews for the NEW JERSEY JURY VERDICT REVIEW and various other trial and Jury Verdict Review Publications throughout the United States.

Zarin's database contains over 100,000 professional case evaluations reported in our Jury Verdict Review & Analysis publications since 1980.

If your successful case results have not been published in Jury Verdict Review & Analysis, submit them for publication by clicking here.

Promote your case as published in Jury Verdict Review Publications.

Jury Verdict Review & Analysis publications and services provide comprehensive resources for the tort litigator.

The LSP also includes one hardcopy subscription to the Jury Verdict Review & Analysis newsletter of your choice, a companion E-zine of the same edition, as well as three call - in professional searches with up to five articles for each assisted search (additional articles available at $ 20 each).

Zarin's Jury Verdict Review & Analysis is seeking Attorneys, Paralegals and writers with legal experience who are interested in becoming contributing writers for piecework that can be done from home.

Compiled from the JVRA database, the Product Liability Annual Report provides a national overview of the most significant cases in product liability from the previous year as published in the Jury Verdict Review & Analysis.

Zarin's Jury Verdict Review Publications was founded in 1980 by Ira J. Zarin, Esq., an eminent and certified civil trial attorney, for the purpose of educating and apprising members of the bar of what is happening at the trial court level by thoroughly reviewing and analyzing civil jury verdicts and settlements.

Not exact matches

We are reviewing the jury's verdict.

Greensboro, North Carolina (CNN)- The jury in former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards» corruption trial ended a second day of deliberations without a verdict Monday after asking to review a batch of exhibits from the four - week case.

The Las Vegas Review - Journal reports that a $ 160 million jury verdict was levied this week against the Cosmopolitan.

An amendment to the Oregon Constitution prohibits judicial review of the amount of punitive damages awarded by a jury «unless the court can affirmatively say there is no evidence to support the verdict.»

In affirming, both the State Court of Appeals and the State Supreme Court rejected Honda's argument that the punitive damages award violated due process because it was excessive and because Oregon courts have no power to correct excessive verdicts under a 1910 amendment to the State Constitution, which prohibits judicial review of the amount of punitive damages awarded by a jury «unless the court can affirmatively say there is no evidence to support the verdict.»

The 1910 amendment, by its terms, did not eliminate those substantive standards but altered the procedures of judicial review:» [N] 0 fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of this state, unless the court can affirmatively say there is no evidence to support the verdict» (emphasis added).

The Court began its analysis by noting that the standard of review of jury verdicts is «exceptionally high» and that a jury's verdict is entitled to a «fair and liberal interpretation in light of the evidence and of the circumstances».

Based on a jury verdict for respondent, that court entered judgment against petitioner for $ 100,000, and, after review in both the Florida District Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Florida, the judgment was ultimately affirmed.

While courts do not acknowledge or encourage jury nullification, judges take «no steps... to prevent jurors from nullifying, jurors are not subject to legal sanction for nullifying, and verdicts that are the result of nullification are not subject to review» (Hreno, at para. 2)

A monthly review of State and Federal civil jury verdicts with professional analysis and commentary.

A monthly national review of State and Federal civil jury medical malpractice verdicts and settlements with professional analysis and commentary selected for their informative and comparative value in the preparation, presentation and defense of medical malpractice litigation.

Litigation Department Co-Chair David Lender and Antitrust Litigation partner Eric Hochstadt have been named «Litigators of the Week» by both The AmLaw Litigation Daily and Global Competition Review for securing a complete defense jury verdict for C&S Wholesale Grocers following nine days of trial in an antitrust class action in Minnesota federal court.

Whether consulting on dispositive motions, preserving issues for potential review, or drafting critical motions in limine, jury instructions, or special verdict forms, Wendy's appellate perspective positions clients to secure common sense, correct, and just appellate outcomes.

Under this approach, a court's role is to hear challenges to administrative agencies» rulings in a manner analogous to reviewing a jury's verdict or a trial judge's legal conclusions.

Our experienced lawyers have obtained numerous large settlements and jury verdicts in truck accidents because we review each law that applies, investigate all the facts, and prepare each case for a jury trial.

Having successfully negotiated and litigated millions of dollars in settlements and jury verdicts for victims of motor vehicle accidents, the lawyers at Altman & Altman LLP will be able to review your case and the structure of the relationship between the parties involved in order to get you the compensation you are entitled to.

This review was sponsored by The Civil Litigator, a comprehensive database of verdicts in the Midwest that can help you find expert witnesses and keep up with jury decisions.

«In an unusual summary opinion, without hearing oral argument, the Court today sent back to the 11th Circuit for further review its holding that a jury verdict in favor of two employees was appropriately set aside.

We ask potential clients to review our firm's history of jury verdicts and settlements which often exceed five to 10 times the amount the insurance company had initially offered.

When a jury renders a verdict in a Florida car accident case, the jury's decision regarding the defendant's liability to the plaintiff is generally insulated from review, absent extraordinary circumstances.

However, once the jury returns a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the award amount that the jury reaches can be subject to a judge's review under certain circumstances.

Savvy clients also regularly bring GMSR in long before the appellate stage to draft dispositive motions, review proposed jury instructions and verdict forms, and advise on strategy with an eye toward appeal.

Similarly, proportionality review does not demand that every variance be supported by a «fact» that is not encompassed within the jury verdict or guilty plea.

[21] Based on a review of the evidence at trial, described in part above, and the cases cited, as well as a review of the submissions of counsel, I find that the offer to settle in the amount of $ 75,000 ought reasonably to have been accepted by the plaintiff having given consideration to the foreseeable credibility problems and the negative verdict of the jury.

As experienced trial attorneys with an established record of multi-million dollar jury verdicts and settlements, we know that success in a personal injury lawsuit is not just about providing counsel, reviewing documents and implementing strategies — it's about going beyond the usual to achieve the best possible results in your case.

A civil jury verdict should be set aside only where it is so plainly unreasonable and unjust that no jury, reviewing the evidence as a whole and acting judicially, could have arrived at the verdict: see Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 (CanLII), [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235, at para. 30.

Guilty verdicts of juries in criminal cases, and any verdict in a civil case like a patent law case, are subject to post-trial review by the trial judge who can throw out the verdict or call for a new trial for a variety of reasons, and to appeal.

The claimant, who was the deceased's sister, applied for judicial review of the decision not to leave unlawful killing as a possible verdict for the jury's consideration.

A review of the evidence and directions as to the law by a judge immediately before a jury retires to consider its verdict

A jury verdict in a civil trial will be set aside only if it is so plainly unreasonable and unjust as to satisfy the court that no jury reviewing the evidence as a whole and acting judicially could have reached it.