Sentences with phrase «just as a judge»

2For just as you judge and criticize and condemn others, you will be judged and criticized and condemned, and in accordance with the measure you [use to] deal out to others, it will be dealt out again to you.

Just as Judge Cahill says, the issue for disclosure is not whether a document is a public or private e-mail but «the content and purpose of the document.»

Just as Judge Boswell correctly demanded a court cite for the ADA's assertion that Wilson did have the «right» to pro se, she should have made the demand of Wilson if for no other reason than a test of Wilson's ability to handle a trial.

An arbitrator issues a decision just as a judge does, and you have agreed in advance to be bound by that decision even though it does not come to you in a Court Order.

Not exact matches

As a judge I'm really just one of the many dots that is being connected.»

And judging from my introduction to Chinese innovators in the health sector — which, as I said, could be an $ 18 trillion market in just 20 or so years — that's one area where the competition's clearly heating up.

The new celebrity judge on «The Voice,» Miley Cyrus is reportedly making just as much as Levine but less than Jennifer Lopez's $ 17.5 million when she was on «American Idol.»

Similarly, some regulators and average citizens are losing patience with the largest banks, judging that the giants may just be irresponsible as a matter of character.

«In two studies, both from Sheryl Sandberg's Lean In and from a Harvard Business School study, when it came to judging women's work less favorably, the women involved in the study were just as biased as the men,» O'Rourke writes, summarizing Nelson's comments.

Second, market consensus, as judged by commentary just prior to the Fed statements, had already arrived at the same conclusion - specifically, if economic events transpired as projected, Fed «tapering» would begin sometime in the autumn or early winter of 2013.

While respondents may feel marginally better about crypto liquidity, over half rate their confidence here as low or they just don't know enough to judge.

Those are the words I spoke as a trial judge in 1997 when I sentenced Bobby Bostic to a total of 241 years in prison for his role in two armed robberies he committed when he was just 16 years old.

New York Supreme Court Judge Jennifer G. Schecter rejected that argument on Tuesday, arguing that the logic of Clinton v. Jones was just as applicable in state court as in federal court.

For the Father judges no one, but has committed all judgment to the Son, that all should honor the Son just as they honor the Father.

In my eyes — it's just as bad as judging people based on their skin color.

I just wish that the people who voted for two terms of Bush would sit out these terms and not say anything until history judges President Obama as we were left to do with George W.

To them, it is simply irrelevant that no federal judge (prior to Rothstein) had ever before found a right to die in the Due Process Clause, just as it is irrelevant that every state in the union, save one, forbids assisted suicide.

I'm not here to judge as I respect your opinion; (after all, many Christians, Muslims, and Jews believe the same thing) I just wanted to put in my two cents as I thought this was an interesting article.

One hopes that common sense, which judges such a desire as grotesque, will prevail over those who would regard it as just another lifestyle choice.

But especially because you obviously have no concept of what «blasphemy» is... The fellow you judged didn't take your Jesus» name in vain, he just used the name as part of his conversation while talking about the mythological figure himself...

SisterChromatid - your missing my point I am not trying to trample anyone else s free speech, I just personally think it could have been said differently, what they said makes them appear like the self righteous ones and that helps no one, as someone who is spiritual and gay I have been judged by both Christians and atheists alike, one says I am going to hell the other says I'm a nutjob, when does it stop?

Understanding this new perspective on church is as difficult today as it was in the days of Jesus for Jews to understand a different perspective on Sabbath, but the basic principles seem to be the same: Church, just like Sabbath, is not supposed to be a bunch of human traditions which have become legalistic laws by which to judge one another's spiritual maturity.

So her anger involves not just a view of him but also a peripheral perception of herself in which she sees herself as someone who is in a moral position to judge.

If the people in the days of the prophets failed to recognize them as prophets, but instead condemned, accused, judged, criticized, and killed them, and if the people in the days of Jesus failed to recognize Him as the Messiah, but instead condemned, accused, judged, criticized, and killed him, then maybe... just maybe... the way to recognize a messenger of God to us is to look at who we Christians like to condemn, accuse, judge, criticize, and kill... and then consider that maybe... just maybe... these people are God's messengers to us.

is transformed in the brain of the smallest boy into the burning plea: «Almighty God, bless our arms when the time comes; be just as thou hast always been; judge now whether we be deserving of freedom; Lord, bless our battle!

Second, just as Maher maybe doesn't have the right to be heard or isn't really interested in engaging with us, so also, we Christians who criticize atheists often don't have the right to be heard either or are only interested in judging and condemning.

Just as we can not restrict our sowing to what we judge to be good soil, or expect all that we sow to be productive, so while the crop is growing we must not try to separate the grain and the weeds.

How many Clam marches in black or Jewish areas have been UPHELD as protected speech, NOT provocative?!! This is just one judge's choice to strike back against atheism.

Just as the child justifies the truth and usefulness of the fetus, so it is faith that judges reason and not the other way around.

So, just as a African American there are things that other African Americans have done that White supermacist want me to answer and link to... there are positive African American achievements as well but we are suppose to judge each other as indiviudals Wonk, so my own actions are all I am responcible for.

So long as Christianity knows the Crucifixion as a vicarious sacrifice for a totally guilty humanity, as the innocent sacrifice of the eternal Son of God to a just but merciful Father, it can never celebrate the definitive victory of the Crucifixion; for such a redeemed humanity remains in bondage to the transcendent Judge, and must continue to be submissive to his distant and alien authority, ever pleading for mercy when it falls away from his absolute command.

As long as we know that this is all a matter of degree, and a matter of choice as to just how we judge that degree, we can allow these loose edges of inconsistent use to remaiAs long as we know that this is all a matter of degree, and a matter of choice as to just how we judge that degree, we can allow these loose edges of inconsistent use to remaias we know that this is all a matter of degree, and a matter of choice as to just how we judge that degree, we can allow these loose edges of inconsistent use to remaias to just how we judge that degree, we can allow these loose edges of inconsistent use to remain.

It was as if those who would be quite shocked if the essence of Christianity were judged by the faith's most perverse historical expressions had no qualms in doing just that to American civil religion.

He senses that if the city gets judged as a whole, the results for individual city dwellers will not be just, because some righteous will suffer with and for the guilty.

Older brother types often condemn, judge, and act superior to younger brother types, which reveals a sense of pride, which is one of the worst types of sins, which means the older brothers are just as wayward as anyone else.

Just because I was different (I am living in Colombia) I am pretty much judged and labeled as a non-believer or a «spiritual baby» because I don't jump around or speak in tongues.

Many folks thought they could read and understand the bible over the years, just as today, only to find themselves lost and confused usually leading to a double standard of judge on Saturday and preach on Sunday.

You keep harping «restrictions» — it's just like the recent ruling by a Judge — one can not place so many restrictions as to eliminate the choice or access.

And even if I am wrong in the end, and there is heaven and hell, I'd refuse to believe that a «God» (that has never shown me a proof of his / her / its existence) will simply put me in hell just because I didn't believe in him / her / it even though I lead a good life as opposed to someone that believed in God but judged others all their lives.

If you are going to use the Bible as a judging tool then use it on «both» candidates not just one.

Today as i was thinking about Jesus sending the demons into the pigs and i thought God is not punishing but judging and he made a decision.This idea came from your other discussion which i believe is what he does he decides to make a judgement call he is sovereign and it shows his tender heart and mercy that not a single person was afflicted.The pigs unlike men have no soul so have no eternal consequence upon them they live and they die.either way they were going to get killed.We can be assured that Gods judgements are right and just the pork was going to the gentile nations who worshipped other Gods and no doubt would have been offered to idols so there is a consequence when we disobey the Laws of God even even when we do nt know or understand his laws.brentnz

Of course, we're friends because we accept each other just as we are and don't judge by something so petty as religious affiliation.

Just an fyi, people — Rand's heroes (Galt, Roark, et al) were never intended to be internalized and universalized as some moral normative standard by which everyone should judge themselves.

You're seriously flawed in your assessment of me, many would disagree with you but then again you have no clue as to who I am - just a few lines on an anonymous blog... kudos for judging a person based on that and that alone.

Just yesterday, I was at a tribunal, where a judge ruled in my favour stating exceptional circumstances and if things were to have continued as they had been it would have represented significant risk to my health.

Recent just war thought, though, has included many examples of using the prudential criteria as if they alone permitted one to judge the justice of a war.

«As you are just, / judge in my favor.

You seem to have highlighted particular sins as though some are worse than others all sin leads to death not just the big ones because we all are sinners.All have gone astray none are righteous.I believe the worst sin is pride idolatry is the first commandment we set ourselves as Gods.Regardless of what the sin is, our hearts are condemned by our pride.It wasnt the sin of homosexuality or sexual deviance that destroyed sodom.It was there pride and it is one of our biggest stumbling blocks in our christian walk or it certainly was for me.We look at the story of the adulterous woman and we think adultery is a terrible crime but the story is for our benefit to show that we all are sinners that Jesus does nt condemn us but came to save us.And when Jesus says go and sin no more he was not only talking to the woman but everyone else that was around judging her for her sin its a universal message that we all need to see that we all are condemned because of our sin that Jesus came to save us and that we turn from our sin and follow him.Because he is the way the truth and the life.brentnz

Just as He says He will judge lustful thoughts as adultery.

And just as God shows mercy on those He judges, we are also to show mercy on those we judge.