Sentences with phrase «just as employers»

Just as employers want to be able to read a few sentences right off the bat to get a sense of who you are, they also don't want to have to wade through a detailed novel about all of your work experience ever.

Just as employers use software applications to keep track of relevant information on their customers, using software to organize information on prospective employees also makes sense.

Just as employers have started to implement policies to minimize liability arising out of employees driving while using cell phones, they may have a new concern to worry about: liability for using a BlackBerry while driving.

Just as an employer wouldn't hire an employee who seems like a bad business partner, an investor feels the same.

Just as an employer can smell a desperate job seeker, they can smell a lack of confidence.

Not exact matches

But just as telework starts to pick up speed, employers may rethink flexible options.

Many actually find they prefer being «hired when needed» as it means they can offer their services to a variety of employers, rather than just one.

«Just because you're terminating someone because they're not work authorized anymore doesn't mean you get out of your obligations as an employer,» says Siskind Susser's Greg Siskind.

To date, Jopwell has facilitated more than 6,000 «connections» between candidates and employers — meaning contact has been made between a company rep and a job seeker — up from 250 just last summer, as candidate applications continue to grow by 40 percent each month.

Similar disdain followed January layoff announcements from Pfizer, Walmart, Microsoft, Coca - Cola, and many less prominent employers, coalescing into an angry narrative: Greedy companies are firing workers just days after getting a historically giant tax cut that will save them billions — a tax cut that was promoted by President Trump and Republicans as a job creator.

One of the reasons Google is a top employer is 85 percent of their employees believe their immediate leader is interested in them as a whole person, not just an employee.

Just remember these five key areas to make sure that your needs are covered in a way that protects your interests as best as you possibly can as an employee or an employer.

By 2017, more than half of employers won't just tolerate employees bringing their own phones, they'll insist on it as they move to lower their own costs.

The news comes just weeks after federal officials drafted an interim final rule to roll back an Obamacare mandate that religious employers cover birth control as part of health insurance plans.

Employee development isn't just the responsibility of the employee, but of the employer as well — if not more so.

With rebates, the insurance company (or employer) is still paying just as much on EpiPen claims as it was before.

Think disparaging comments about the employer or racist musings, as just two examples.

The performance reflects the impressive display of endurance training by a stock market that just keeps on running, as well as increased employee and employer contributions to retirement accounts.

And those other workers, by the way, were already unionized, making it a sneak attack not just on the employer, but a rival union as well.

The rule change affects around 600,000 employees directly, granting them paid leave when before they had none, but as President Obama explained in an email interview with Slate, the aims of the new rule are broader — the administration is hoping to set an example and convince employers more generally that paid time off isn't just humane, but also good business.

The Labor Department says employers added just 142,000 jobs in September as manufacturers and oil drillers shed workers.

As remote work options continue to gain traction, employers that embrace work flexibility as more than just a perk may find themselves better positioned to attract and retain the best employeeAs remote work options continue to gain traction, employers that embrace work flexibility as more than just a perk may find themselves better positioned to attract and retain the best employeeas more than just a perk may find themselves better positioned to attract and retain the best employees.

That doesn't mean such plans can't be just as effective, however, and employers often sweeten the deal by making contributions of their own, straight into your account.

«The vast majority of employers consider soft skills to be just as important as hard skills when evaluating prospective hires, and some even consider them more important,» she says.

On the other hand, if an employer pays for recreational or similar expenses on a company - wide basis, it's generally agreed upon by the experts that the entire cost can be deducted, just as before.

As an employer, if I knew you worked even just 20 hours a week while in school I would be impressed.

As both a business and an employer of people, Google has an interest in being seen by its staff not just as a place of work, but as a way of lifAs both a business and an employer of people, Google has an interest in being seen by its staff not just as a place of work, but as a way of lifas a place of work, but as a way of lifas a way of life.

The move should also serve as a wake - up call to employers in all sectors, he said, «that we expect them to not just abide by the letter but by the spirit of the rules.»

Just as customer feedback allows businesses to improve their product or service and, in turn, increase customer retention, employee feedback gives employers the opportunity to learn how to provide the best experience for their workforce and, consequently, increase employee retention.

Finding the sweet spot: Hiring surged in February as employers added 313,000 jobs, but it slowed in March to a gain of just 103,000 — well below the average for the past year.

The percent of part - time workers peaked at 20.1 % in 2010 and has dropped to 17.9 %, which is still high but shrinking as employers hire more full - time workers, just as in past recoveries.

The Skills Tests were just what I needed to show potential employers my abilities as well as refresh myself on the information.

Another encouraging change for jobseekers and employers alike is that more employers are proudly discussing their flexible work options as a business strategy rather than just an employee perk.

I just don't see how putting on a hat clearly designated by the employer as uniform necessarily means that the individual is «practicing» a belief or «celebrating» a holiday.

So if you have a daughter working and she is ordered to wear a bikini as her «uniform» then its ok just because the employer says so

Just the same as you want a higher paying job - move on - not your place to FORCE an employer to pay for your abortion.

Just as they have the freedom to get another job if they want to wear their crosses, you women are free to go to another university or employer if you want insurance that provides contraceptives and abortions.

Fourthly, if we subscribe to the notion that there is no separation regarding work (viewed as worship — Col 3:17, 23 - 24; Rom 12:1) in the church and the marketplace, why shouldn't Christians (who argue against receiving God's provision in the form of a salary) just «trust God», and reject their employers» salary structure?

They get angry, kill their spouses, steal from their employer, beat their kids, just as often as those who are not Christians.

It is not easy to justify as a matter of «right» the exemptions from taxes paid by most employers, and one could contend that if nonprofit organizations employ people, they should pay the appropriate employers» share of social security and unemployment taxes just as any other employers do.

Just as the — head chef, front desk manager, bell hop or director of room service is free to resign at any time — the employer reserves the right to terminate the employee at any time, as well.

As you can see, employers won't simply be enhancing just the abilities of their staff by implementing on - site language learning, they'll also be ensuring the future success of their establishments.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I am not sure that this is going to change the dynamic of feeling uncomfortable in public as a nursing mom or of employers giving you just the option of using the bathroom.

In good times and bad, employers frequently use «just — in — time» scheduling practices - setting hourly workers» schedules with limited advance notice to accommodate fluctuating demand - as a means of maintaining a tight link between labor costs and demand.

There is some on pumping, and requirements for employers as far as employees and providing them time to pump, but as far as nursing in public, that's just it.

Employers should be encouraged to offer the benefits of the law to all women, not just those subject to overtime requirements, and for as long as women choose to breastfeed, not just for a year.

Just as too many parents don't know that formula is not a breast milk equivalent, too many employers don't realize that it's generally in the best interest of their bottom line to be breastfeeding - friendly.

Just as worrying is the finding that most of these people have hid their problems from their employers.

We want everyone to have the opportunity to go as far as their talents can take them - not just to benefit those who have the skills and desire to work, but also to ensure employers are not missing out on vital skills.