Sentences with phrase «just as the scientist»

in reality, in some ways I do agree with your post and that's the reason I also included that religionists can be equally arrogant in their knowledge of spiritual things just as scientists.

Just as scientists constantly gain further insight into the universe through exploration, it is ignorant in my view to assume we know everything there is to know, and they we have the capability to do so...

Just as scientists would say 1 day old Adam was 30 years old, scientists would examine the Earth and say it was billions of years old when it was also just a few days old.

But just as scientists use radio and gamma - ray telescopes to probe different frequencies of light, physicists are building detectors sensitive to a range of gravity wave frequencies.

Scott had prepared for the TMAY question (See Interviewing Skills: What To Do When They Say «Tell Me About Yourself»), but he hadn't expected the «not just as a scientist» twist.

Tell me about yourself as a person, not just as a scientist.»

Just as scientists begin to unmask the microbiome — they're even working with the White House to launch a national microbiome research initiative — they're realizing that many microbiomes are threatened.

Just as scientists writing on policy don't quite get it right.

Just as all scientists must live with the ever - present possibility of experimental error, so too mathematicians, like our judicial system, may sometimes have to settle not for absolute proof but rather proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

It is the only marine ice sheet to have survived beyond the last ice age, and just as scientists predicted 30 years ago, the parts of it that are shrinking are those that are raked by sea currents.

Just as our attempts to find extraterrestrials are becoming more advanced, just as scientists are increasingly confident we aren't the only intelligent beings in the universe, humans are creating more technology - produced noise than ever before, undermining our ability to detect potential alien transmissions.

Just as scientists before him catalogued the human genome, Hill is helping lay the groundwork for the global mapping of the human metabolome.

At this point, we surely have the right to wonder, just as scientists themselves are already doing, whether the burden of proof has shifted.

Just as a scientist needs to mix and match doses until the perfect formula is established, your strength training operates the same way.

Louden is also insistent that her tours be «sustainable,» meaning that the artists who appear with her at each book event are compensated and that all their expenses are paid, «just as scientists or business professionals would be,» she says.

Ezawa checks how our perception of a central figure changes according to the modifications of its surroundings, just as a scientist would do, perhaps similarly to the other Ezawa's scientific investigations in Japan.

Just as scientists make forward progress towards a cure for the contagious face - eating cancer plaguing Tasmanian devils, an outbreak of mysterious skin lesions has spread through at least on population of bottle - nosed

Just as scientists were recruited into the political projects of the cold war, they are recruited into the War on Carbon.

Just as scientists would not accept the findings in a scientific paper without seeing the primary data, so should they not rely on Thomson Scientific's impact factor, which is based on hidden data.

Unfortunately, he was vilified on the grounds that he had receved financial support from Philip Morris — just as scientists who question the global warming scare are vilified if they have received much - needed funding from the fossil fuel industry — as you have described so eloquently elsewhere on your blog.

Just as the scientist takes his instances and from them builds up his general propositions, so the lawyer should take his precedents and from them build up his general principles...

... Just as the scientist seeks for truth, so the lawyer should seek for justice.

Not exact matches

As reiterated in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report issued on March 31, scientists estimate that we can emit no more than 500 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide in order to limit the increase in global temperature to just 2 degrees C by 2100 (and governments attending the successive climate summits have agreed in principle to this objective).

For a long time scientists thought the undertones in a person's voice served just as a marker, a vocal fingerprint of sorts that allowed others to distinguish between speakers.

Those roaming the halls this year were just as likely to encounter fraud experts, customer service managers, risk management teams, and data scientists as software engineers, says Cloudera CEO Tom Reilly.

While this is not as exciting a find as the planet covered with oceans of oil that everyone was hoping scientists would find, maybe the promise of untold riches is just the incentive NASA needs to get its space program in gear.

Thus, the path dependency that political scientist Paul Pierson, 1997 has observed in pension reforms is not just an observed fact, but a desired characteristic.21 Threats to sustainability are typically identified as expenditures rising above an acceptable level, and especially in prefunded DB plans, volatility of pension contributions or accounting expenses for pensions.

It's not just the big - name corporations that are making a point to engage the next generation of scientists and innovators — Space Angels - funded Because Learning, previously known as Ardusat, has their own ideas for how to engage students in STEM fields.

With just over 70 employees in Ottawa, Canada, as well as in Pune, India, we will continue to grow our team — adding developers and data scientists, expanding our quality and operations teams, hiring UX specialists and digital marketing staff, and building our support and success teams to be available to our customers throughout the world.

You do not have to be a NASA scientist or a religious person to know that there has to be a designer who is responsible for this existence, just walk outside at night and gaze at the stars and ask yourself as to how did our solar system became so perfectly established and how our planets are perfectly aligned.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

I would never expect to learn about science from a preacher, just as I wouldn't expect to learn about religion from a scientist.

As for the appendix, it's not that scientists «theorize» that it is useless, it just is.

Since its 1861 discovery in Bavaria, just a few years after the publication of Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species, most scientists have placed Archaeopteryx at the root of the broad group of proto - birds, known as Avialae, from which our avian feathered friends emerged.

As too your point that only scientists have the credentials to argue evolution, that is just silly.

I just posted part of this as a reply to an atheist using quotes and facts from various scientists, citing his sources.

Yet the mind's power of immediately intuiting and actively engaging with the environmental order in which we are immersed, is in the scientist just as in the religious believer.

In the field of biology, evolution may be «just» a theory (as some politicians painfully point out), but it is the theory subscribed to, for good reason, by every real scientist in every established university in the Western world.

She is an engineer masqerading as a scientist, but she's really just a corporate plant.

This is one thing that bugs me about evolution scientist is that they find evidence for micro evolution and then lump into together with macro and pass it off as validating scientific proof it's just poor science.

One appropriate response for the religious liberal, as for the social scientist, is to inquire very closely just what sort of past we are being asked to return to.

I recall one time that someone referred to me as a scientist because just because of the interest I took in my job and learned a lot about it.

Religion and science as embodied and advanced by real, living scientists are just not as separable as many would wish to think.

THAT is what «has scientists «baffled»», as I said... and not just Christian scientists, mind you.

Isn't a bit just as zealous as a creationist that tells you creationism is fact, to force an absolutely unproven theory, with zero physical evidence as scientific fact, rather than a wild theory that many scientist desperately hold onto?

Not what u see on CNN, not what your mum said nor your pastor or priest said and not what u see some Muslims neighbors of yours do... noooo nay,,, what have u searched your self... i dare u do... find the true, i swear nothing makes any sense as Islam does, those guys know the whole truth... even if it will hurt, just like Santa - clause when u 12 year or the rats that gives money to the de toothing kid in our Ugandan myth, u deserve to know the truth... and if no scientist has come out and disproved the divine origin of this universe logically then there must be a mighty some one behind it and that Creator or whatever it is, HE has a way, a straight path to Him and we are obliged to know it... so my adverse to u is look hard for the true coz it is clear from false, even if u may hate it!!

Unluckily just when scientists are opening their minds to a nondeterministic view of cosmic order many philosophers, here and in England, are still playing the old game (as old as ancient stoicism) of trying to reconcile human freedom with strict causal determination of all events.

Just 20 years ago, as a Harvard scientist named Herbert Benson tells the story, he asked about inviting the Dalai Lama to the U.S. and the response was «Dolly who?»

Lesser men than the great scientists too readily assumed that all new knowledge must be made to fit the «scientific» dogma, just as earlier it was expected to fit the ecclesiastical dogma.

In this light, it is not the case that we would abandon a moral, religious, aesthetic or political life for a life of doing logic, but rather, we would not leave the moral life to the ethicists, the religious life to the theologians and customary religious practices, and the political life to the politicians and political scientists, just as we surely would not leave propositions in the hands of the logicians.4