Sentences with phrase «just by answering this question»

How you can do that in the most efficient way is shown just by answering the questions below.

Just by answering this question, we are presenting the gospel.

These two worksheets enable you to check a student's understanding of this topic while keeping them engaged by having them work in pairs, or by drawing and getting involved, not just by answering questions.

Not exact matches

If the answer to that question is yes, you may get the opportunity just by getting to know these folks, he adds.

If you're looking for a more scientific diagnosis, there's also a tried and true 40 - question diagnostic test developed by scientists that will give you a more official answer to that burning office question — Is he really a narcissist or just a garden - variety jerk?

Then I'd ask them by a show of hands how many of them answered the question from the perspective of «this room, in this course, the one they just happen to have scheduled right now.»

Some job candidates don't actually care about the answers to the questions they ask; they are just trying to look good by asking what they hope are great questions.

While Google was once just a search box followed by a page of blue links, the search giant has been trying hard to become a one - stop provider of answers to common questions.

The same goes for «thrive under pressure;» we test that by acknowledging and at the same time telling people, «We're going to ask you, in the next ten minutes, to answer x number of questions, just to see can you maintain a high - quality bar while getting through this?

As a great example of the inherently holistic nature of social marketing, Heidi relies heavily on her existing blog content to make sure that questions get a thorough response in a way that would not be possible by just answering the question on LinkedIn alone (as of this writing there's a limit of 4,000 characters for responses).

STANLEY FISCHER: But by the way, you've just answered a question that I — have asked frequently.

The celeb can then choose to answer these questions by responding directly to the fan, at which point the fan will likely freak out on their Twitter page that Kim Kardashian just answered their query as to how she lost her baby weight (it was the Atkins diet).

We don't just work to protect the environment — we tap into the universal human desire for self - determination, and work to change how decisions are made in B.C. by answering questions like: Who gets to decide?

Shortening the form by asking different questions over time lets the marketing team provide the sales team with detailed contact files for qualified leads, but saves the lead from having to answer 14 questions when they've only just started identifying a need in the first place.

According to a Study by Loup Ventures, a Newyork based investment firm, Siri could correctly answer just 52.3 % of 782 standardized questions.

and maybe, just maybe, you would be compelled by the lord almighty to answer questions you will not answer now.

Just how many of those questions will be answered by season two is a question that remains to be answered, but now we know when it'll be answered: October 27.

By the way the question was answered but you just forgot what it was and no I am not Saraswati, just a fan.

You're just parroting the kind of standard eighth grade atheist questions that are answered by reading any number of excellent authors.

One can not answer the question of what constitutes the just society by pointing to socialism as such, while among capitalist societies there are varying approximations of justice.

Keen has answered just such a question by suggesting that his concern is a phenomenological one, centering on those places where the holy is most manifest.

So to answer your question... no, it is not just two verses that proclaim how the Church arrives at Truth... it is by Tradition and the Magisterium and the Bible which holds us all together by the grace of God.

Just ask a simple question (its a question that everyone would agree on that the question is the exact one to ask to get the truth) and by the answer (yes or no) given by the most knowledgeable / high positioned persons of that religion, you will eliminate every religion except Christianity.

Wanting it to be otherwise will just keep us wanting it to be otherwise and that makes us desperate and susceptible to the answers of the so - called «experts» rather than those that make themselves known by a willingness to live the questions.

He responded by relating the parable of the Good Samaritan, one of my personal favorites... bear traps are hidden, and often unseen till bear or human are caught in them... the traps are deliberately placed, they don't just suddenly appear... the answer to the question was the man who had compassion on the man taken by robbers... he was a social and spiritual outcast who had compassion on someone who in normal circumstances would have hated his guts... because his doctrine and «lifestyle» were not acceptable to the religious establishment... I have had life experiences that bear this out, experiencing love and compassion from people whom today's religious establishment demonizes and looks down upon... any reading of the Good Samaritan story should be followed up by a reading of 1 Corinthians 13....

Asked if he believes the probe will address the concerns of residents, the minister answered: «I think it will depend on how the inquiry proceeds, the line of questioning and the extent to which the inquiry really is trying to dig deep as to the causes of the fire - by that I don't just mean the technical aspect.»

Just as in Bultmann's analysis the questions of belief and truth that theology now faces can be adequately answered only by way of radical demythologizing and existentialist interpretation, so it is now clear to me that what is required if theology is to deal satisfactorily with the issues of action and justice (which for many persons are even more urgent) is a theological method comprising thoroughgoing de-ideologizing and political interpretation.

We're told to just trust, but when we feel like our trust has been violated by those who deliver the message, it's no longer that easy, and we have questions to ask that have no easy answers (or do have easy answers but the people we ask have rather violent reactions towards such questions).

I answered Zoll's questions by e-mail over a month ago, and just for the record (and because two can be journalists in a case like this), I reproduce those questions and answers in full here.

Then he proceeded to answer his own question by proposing three basic postulates or principles that we do well to keep in mind when examining issues such as those that surface — or lie just beneath the surface — of Hiebert's «The Gospel in Human Contexts.»

Just as in Bultmann's analysis the question of belief and truth that theology now faces can be adequately answered only by way of radical demythologizing and existentialist interpretation, so it is now clear to me that what is required if theology is to deal satisfactorily with the issues of action and justice (which for many persons are even more urgent) is a theological method comprising thoroughgoing de-ideologizing and political interpretation.32

But yes, some teachers answered in a very non answer kinda way — i didn't let them get away with it... i forced the answer by either being completely rude towards what i thought to be there religion or just asked a long series of questions which gave the answer with cunning and gile.

Emilio, I have been thinking about your question («I just want an answer on how it is that evil people who want to by choice remain evil, be dealt with?»)

just because a naturalistic explanation does not exist presently for many of the questions which anyone can ask — that doesn't give license to ignorant, infantile, delusional suboid humans to answer those questions by skipping all the requisite hard work science demands only to jump directly to «god did it».

Sometimes I just have to answer a question by asking another question!!

And because I get annoyed when people try to manipulate answers by way of rewording the question, I always request to skip it because I JUST GAVE YOU THREE WORDS, DAMNIT (ok, two if you're the kind of person who writes over-thinker as overthinker).

Thank you for reading, commenting, and creating a community where a question from one reader is just as likely to get answered by another reader as it is by me.

Just a thought of one team who is in the «NO» side of the answer to the QB Question:» Do you have a QB that can lead a playoff run or a high draft pick waiting behind a vet that was chosen by the current regime?»

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Someone who may not be able to last the final year because of all the life being sucked out of him by this club who lacks any real ambition... Jamie Carragher and all the other critics are right, the whole club from top to bottom needs to change, and some serious questions have to be answered with serious actions, not just talk... Stan Kroenke, Ivan Gazidis, Arsene Wenger, and the other board members need to address this problem or move out.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

But the only way we will know the answer to that question is to make sure that whatever helmets female lacrosse players wear meet standards that are based on science, and have been developed after a deliberative and collaborative process by an independent organization, like ASTM, which is not funded by helmet manufacturers (unlike NOCSAE), and which does not just invite, but requires input from equipment manufacturers, product testing laboratories, researchers and governing bodies, in this case US Lacrosse.

But the only way we will know the answer to that question is to make sure that whatever helmets female lacrosse players wear meet standards that are based on science, and have been developed after a deliberative and collaborative process by an independent organization, like ASTM, which is not funded by helmet manufacturers (unlike NOCSAE), and which does not just invite, but

Just as children learn best by imitation, making it important to always be aware of the examples we set, their tendency to tune - in to our emotions and upsets makes it vital for us to stay in - tune with them so that we can alleviate their anxieties and answer their questions and ease their fears.

by: Anonymous Hello, I Just want to say Thank you for taking the time to answer my Question... I have a 7 month old son and He is now slowly eating solid Foods and is drinking two percent.

Imagine being able to relax, get your questions answered by someone who's job it is to do JUST THAT.

The COLAGE Donor Insemination Guide, launched just a few weeks ago, aims to address some of those concerns by sharing the perspectives and answering the questions of donor - conceived children.

MAY 22nd: Open Question & Answers — Just drop by and ask any question about Baby Loss and connect with others who may be able Question & Answers — Just drop by and ask any question about Baby Loss and connect with others who may be able question about Baby Loss and connect with others who may be able to help.

* Note that the site starts quizzes at ages 5, which is in my opinion an appropriate age to start figuring out your child's love language, if you are trying before this age you may have some difficulty answering the questions, but it won't hurt to try, just know as they get older you want to retest as some answers may be swayed by maturity and not having certain life experiences.

I've never had any questions answered by a dr.. They have always just said they don't know why I lost hair or had discharge and to not worry about it.