Click to visit Basics of Court Forms and Filing to learn about filling out legal forms and filing with the justice courts, or click to visit
Justice Courts for links and contact information for your court.
Click to visit Basics of Court Forms and Filing for specific information about how to file in the justice court or click to visit
Justice Courts for links and contact information for your court.
Click to visit
Justice Courts for court location and contact information.
Click to visit our Basics of Court Forms and Filing for tips on how to fill out legal forms and file in the justice court, or click to visit
Justice Courts for court location and contact information.
You must file your application in
the justice court for the township where the adverse party has committed or is committing the crime involving intentional physical or mental injury or sexual abuse or sexual exploitation of the child.
You must file your application in
the justice court for the township where the workplace harassment occurred or where the person affected by the harassment was located when it occurred.
(3) The Ontario Court of Justice is a youth court for the purposes of the Young Offenders Act (Canada) and a youth
justice court for the purposes of the Youth Criminal Justice Act (Canada).
Bullhead City residents can easily access the local
Justice Court for relief if they are having issues with getting deposits back or if the landlord is not meeting their duty.
Not exact matches
U.S. Supreme
Court justices expressed support on Tuesday
for Microsoft's bid to fend off class action claims by Xbox 360 owners who say the video game console gouges discs because of a design defect.
By contrast, Delaware Chancery
Court Judge Leo Strine, now chief
justice of the state Supreme
Court, wrote in the Wake Forest Law Review: «Corporate law requires directors, as a matter of their duty of loyalty, to pursue a good faith strategy to maximize profits
for the stockholders.»
WASHINGTON, Feb 27 (Reuters)- Supreme
Court justices on Tuesday wrestled with Microsoft Corp's dispute with the U.S.
Justice Department over whether prosecutors can force technology companies to hand over data stored overseas, with some signaling support
for the government and others urging Congress to pass a law to resolve the issue.
WASHINGTON, Feb 27 - Supreme
Court justices on Tuesday wrestled with Microsoft Corp's dispute with the U.S.
Justice Department over whether prosecutors can force technology companies to hand over data stored overseas, with some signaling support
for the government and others urging Congress to pass a law to resolve the issue.
Justice Samuel Alito wrote
for the unanimous
court, «once a use of force is deemed reasonable... it may not be found unreasonable by reference to some separate constitutional violation.»
Sturm Ruger said in February it expects a rise in demand
for its firearms if a Democrat wins the presidential election on Nov. 8 and becomes positioned to appoint future Supreme
Court justices.
Next week, the Department of
Justice is taking AT&T (t) to
court to block its $ 85 billion bid
for Time Warner (TWC).
The duty to consult with First Nations resides with the Federal government — as Chief
Justice McLachlin wrote in the 2004 Haida Nation v. British Columbia [2004] decision of the Supreme
Court, «the ultimate legal responsibility
for consultation and accommodation rests with the Crown.»
Justice Stephen Breyer wrote
for the
court that the Alabama Legislature and the federal
court that ruled on the plan had taken a «mechanically numerical» view, instead of trying to figure out what percentage of black voters were needed to elect a candidate of their choice.
The Obama administration
Justice Department,
for instance, has opened 23 investigations of law enforcement agencies, including police departments in Baltimore, Chicago and Ferguson, Missouri,
for unconstitutional practices and has reached
court - enforceable consent decrees with many of them.
He landed interviews to clerk
for US Supreme
Court Justice Anthony Kennedy and
Justice Antonin Scalia, but he didn't get the job.
The stakes in finding discriminatory intent are higher because it provides a window
for opponents to argue that Texas should be forced to resume having changes to voting laws «pre-cleared» by the
Justice Department or a federal
court.
In a 5 to 4 vote, the
Court — whose
justices have lifetime appointments — deflated the nationwide movements
for term limits.
But he said the European
Court of
Justice should review the matter, a process that could take around a year, according to a lawyer
for the publishers.
The
Justice Department said AT&T would use Time Warner's films and movies to force rival pay TV companies to pay «hundreds of millions of dollars more per year
for Time Warner's networks» in its lawsuit filed late Monday in federal
court in Washington.
A
court in Berlin on Tuesday referred to the European Court of Justice a dispute in which German publishers want search engine providers such as Google to pay them for displaying parts of their newspaper articles on
court in Berlin on Tuesday referred to the European
Court of Justice a dispute in which German publishers want search engine providers such as Google to pay them for displaying parts of their newspaper articles on
Court of
Justice a dispute in which German publishers want search engine providers such as Google to pay them
for displaying parts of their newspaper articles online.
The Supreme
Court's Citizens United decision in 2010 allowed
for unlimited political spending by corporations, but
Justice Anthony Kennedy expressed his strong support
for public disclosure of the money spent.
Justice Steven Barrett in Bronx Supreme
Court handed the longest sentence of 6-1/2 years to Eliseo Perez, 49, who was an assistant chief
for security at the time of the attack.
«A criminal defendant, we hold, need not request special interrogatories, nor need he acquiesce in the Government's request
for discrete findings by the jury, in order to preserve in full a timely - raised objection to jury instructions,»
Justice J. Ginsburg wrote in her explanation of the
court's decision.
Writing
for the majority,
Justice Antonin Scalia, the Supreme
Court's most famous religious conservative today, essentially denied the plaintiffs free exercise of their religion.
(2) Bringing this case into
court for litigation may be unusual but is not surprising; and (3) The concern about political influence in making this decision is an unfortunate cost of candidate and President Trump's disregard
for the institutions of
justice.
He was considered
for two U.S. Supreme
Court vacancies that went to Chief
Justice John Roberts and
Justice Samuel Alito.
As a textualist largely in the mold of late Supreme
Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Gorsuch has frequently advocated
for interpreting laws based solely on text, regardless of the desirability of the outcomes.
Take a view of the Royal Exchange in London, a place more venerable than many
courts of
justice, where the representatives of all nations meet
for the benefit of mankind.
Earlier this week, the U.S. Department of
Justice filed a legal brief in an appeals
court case, arguing against workplace discrimination protection
for employees who are gay.
Chesnoff declined to comment on the charges but said
Justice of the Peace Janiece Marshall set another
court hearing
for April 3.
Martin's initial appearance in the U.S. District
Court of Baltimore was scheduled
for next Tuesday, the
Justice Department said.
But it's hard to present an energetic defense of, say, the European
Court of
Justice's role in enforcing the Single Market, or
for the European Arrest Warrant, while the country is succumbing to a flare - up of a chronic psychological condition.
DiFabio also applauded Trump
for his Supreme
Court pick: «Thank - you
for Justice Gorsuch on the Supreme
Court,» DiFabio said.
Andersen was convicted of obstruction of
justice for shredding documents relating to its audit of Enron, though the Supreme
Court overturned the conviction in 2005.
Judge John D. Bates of the District
Court for the District of Columbia issued a decision today that found in favor of the
Justice Department in its civil antitrust lawsuit to block health insurer Aetna Inc.'s acquisition of rival insurer Humana Inc..
The five lawsuits to block the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule continued to move forward in July in separate venues, but the Department of
Justice strongly defended the rule in a Washington, D.C., federal district
court challenging the suit filed by the National Association
for Fixed Annuities, or NAFA.
«Taxes are what we pay
for a civilized society» (U.S. Supreme
Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes).
So here's a way
for the Dreamers to be protected, President Trump to be responsive to public opinion and
for the Department of
Justice to devote its resources to better causes (like keeping AR - 15s out of the hands of crazy people)-- end the appeals and allow the
court rulings to stand.
The judge said in a 91 - page decision that, while the Army Corps substantially complied with the National Environmental Policy Act, federal permits issued
for the pipeline violated the law in some respects, saying in a
court order the Corps did not «adequately consider the impacts of an oil spill on fishing rights, hunting rights, or environmental
justice.»
Following a controversial New York Times editorial by former Supreme
Court Justice John Paul Stevens Tuesday calling
for the repeal of the Second Amendment, we asked readers to respond, offering not only the news of Stevens» stance, but also a Chicago Tribune editorial taking the other side of the issue.
Looking ahead: Retired Supreme
Court Justice John Paul Stevens has called
for repeal of the Second Amendment.
The Department of
Justice defended the rule when it filed papers in July in a Washington district
court arguing against the case filed by the National Association
for Fixed Annuities.
Retired Supreme
Court Justice John Paul Stevens is calling
for the repeal of the 2nd Amendment to allow
for significant gun control legislation.
FOR the last two weeks, a
justice in New York State Supreme
Court has heard testimony in one of the most pivotal cases of the financial crisis.
Last year,
for example, the
Justice Department filed an amicus brief
for the Masterpiece Cakeshop Supreme
Court case in support of the Christian baker who refused to bake a wedding cake
for a gay couple.
The legal basis
for deriving implied powers from the penumbra of other express powers is best seen in
Justice Douglas classic opinion in Griswold v. Connecticut.5 In the Griswold case, the United States Supreme
Court struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the use of contraception.