The Ontario Superior Court of
Justice accepted the argument, adding that Linamar was entitled to take reasonable steps to protect its reputation.
Not exact matches
Kirsten: There's an article in The New York Times about Supreme Court
Justice John Paul Stevens basically making this
argument that for the first 200 years of the country it was just
accepted that the Second Amendment was understood to protect a well - regulated militia.
And to
accept the
arguments of the abolitionist, our great - great - grandparents had to see beyond the «plain meaning» of proof texts like Ephesians 6:1 - 5, Colossians 3:18 - 25; 4:1, and I Timothy 6:1 - 2 and instead be compelled by the general sweep of Scripture toward
justice and freedom.
The
justices accepted review Monday of an appeal from a Lutheran church in Michigan, and will hear oral
arguments this fall.
Prior to this morning, the first, Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, appeared unlikely to prove explosive, while the second, Evenwel v. Abbott, held the potential for fireworks — but only if the
justices were willing to
accept an especially audacious
argument which seems to cut against the explicit language of the Constitution.
In a 5 - 0 vote, the
justices rejected claims that the law primarily benefited religious institutions that run private schools and
accepted arguments that it gave families choice and allowed parents to determine where the money went.
Madame
Justice Loo rejected the defence
arguments and
accepted that the Plaintiff was indeed injured in this collision.
«I do not
accept Mr. Johnson's
argument that the review board took what he describes as a «categorical approach,» namely that any lawyer who swears in anger in a courthouse will automatically be guilty of professional misconduct,» said
Justice J.A. Frankel.
Accepting this
argument, Mr
Justice Sales had crafted a costs order by analogy with Part 36.
Mr.
Justice Denny Thomas of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench did not merely
accept the
arguments of the Alberta Union of Provincial Employees when he slapped an injunction on the Government of Alberta yesterday, indefinitely suspending a law that could have forced 22,000 civil servants to live with a contract imposed on them by legislative fiat.
However, the strength of this
argument is weakened by Ontario (Attorney General) v Fraser, 2011 SCC 20 at para 295, where
Justices Rothstein and Charron, writing concurring reasons, did not
accept that occupational status as an agricultural worker was a protected ground on the record before them.
The high court will hold a conference today at which the
justices will consider whether to
accept for
argument appeals submitted to them this summer, including Baltimore County's.
The courts also appear to be less inclined to
accept arguments about fair hearing or that
justice can not be done in the alternative jurisdiction in the absence of the strongest possible evidence to the contrary (Ferrexpo AG v Gilson Investments Ltd & Ors [2012] EWHC 721 (Comm), [2012] 1 Lloyd's Rep 588).
But when the court
accepted the privacy commissioner's
arguments that the offender's actions could undermine the administration of
justice, harm participants in the
justice system and potentially discourage people from accessing the
justice system, there was no acknowledgement that the same concerns go directly to the heart of the open - court principle and balanced interests that supported the first complete publication of the same document.
Access to
justice and legal aid will only escape the axe — and rightly so — if they can be supported by
arguments that the government of the day can understand and
accept.
Justice Beach did not
accept Google Inc.'s
argument, and further declared that Metropolitan Schools Ltd and Tamiz v Google Inc do not represent the common law in Australia.