This culminated in a judgement against DM in early 2011, which they promptly appealed (sent to the European Court of
Justice as a test case).
Not exact matches
I didn't say there was no inequality in the
justice system, I said the media inflames when they use 1
case as a litmus
test, especially when the system is stacked in favor of defendants.
Noting that «a majority of the
Justices has at various times expressed their disapproval of the Lemon
test» (
Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy have also criticized Lemon, but voted not to hear this
case), Scalia wrote that he would have used this
case as a vehicle «to inter the Lemon
test once for all.»
Before the introduction of the residency
test, the Ministry of
Justice (MoJ) described the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offences Act (Laspo)
as «targeting legal aid at the most serious
cases which have sufficient priority to justify the use of public funds».
Lord
Justice Moses concluded that the common law right of access to a court —
as demonstrated in
cases such
as Witham — would not provide a basis to challenge the Lord Chancellor's decision on the
test (para 57 — 59).
French magistrates who were
testing case prediction technology by legal AI start - up Predictice
as part of a Ministry of
Justice - supported
test project, have said that they see...
He is known
as an expert in EU immigration law and has litigated key
test cases before the European Court of
Justice.
French magistrates who were
testing case prediction technology by legal AI start - up Predictice
as part of a Ministry of
Justice - supported
test project, have said that they see no «additional value» in the system,
as compared to the capabilities they have already.
FURTHER ACCOUNT In the Bank Charges
Test Case — OFT v Abbey National and others [2008] All ER (D) 349 (Apr)(see NLJ 9 May 2008, p 668)-- Mr
Justice Andrew Smith on 22 May 2008 granted the banks permission to appeal his ruling that current terms and conditions for unarranged overdraft charges were susceptible to assessment
as to fairness under the Consumer Credit Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/1956).
The
case was brought by the Public Law Project, a national legal charity that promotes access to
justice, on the basis that the residence
test would, if implemented, violate fundamental constitutional rights guaranteed by the common law and the European Convention on Human Rights,
as incorporated into United Kingdom law by the Human Rights Act 1998.
If the
test is satisfied
as determined by the judge or
justice in the
case, the evidence will be admitted at trial.
In the conduct of a discrimination claim, the special advocate and indeed the judge can
test the
case of the alleged discriminator without the input of the claimant thereby ensuring that
justice, albeit what the employment judge described
as «imperfect
justice», was possible.
In January 2015, Mr
Justice Silber gave the family permission to bring a
test case against the coroner, which challenged the lawfulness of her approach to directing invasive autopsies when there was a possibility that non - invasive investigations such
as CT scans might be more appropriate, when the family of the deceased had expressed religious objections to an invasive autopsy.
The keynote speaker, Mr
Justice Ryder provided a comprehensive and informative speech in which he highlighted the fact that Re B and Re B - S were «not intended to redraw the statutory landscape» and that the statutory
test should not have a «gloss» placed upon it but that the aim of these
cases was to act
as a revision of good practice in respect of the existing
test rather than eliciting a new
test or presumption.
The keynote will be followed by workshop sessions on a wide variety of topics of interest to criminal, juvenile, child welfare and mental health practitioners, including but not limited to the wrongful conviction and exoneration of Frederick Clay, litigating nursing home admissions, appellate advocacy, criminal
case law update, how to use social science research in your
case, the new sentencing guidelines, restorative
justice, ensuring language access, advanced issues in Superior Court litigation, representing emerging adults, how to contest preliminary drug
test results, a practicum on mindfulness,
as well
as the latest from the immigration impact unit.
The
Justice Department will make $ 40 million in grants for rape kit
testing, including $ 2 million to assist localities in sending
case information to what is known
as the FBI's Violent Criminal Apprehension Program, or ViCAP.
In circumstances where a parent acquires the rights and liabilities of a subsidiary it is likely to be the
case that the Court of
Justice would treat this
as including the right to assert any EU legal professional privilege enjoyed by the subsidiary, although the point does not appear to have been
tested in jurisprudence.
As notorious as their cases are and as palpable as wrongful convictions should be — the test for miscarriage of justice can be elusiv
As notorious
as their cases are and as palpable as wrongful convictions should be — the test for miscarriage of justice can be elusiv
as their
cases are and
as palpable as wrongful convictions should be — the test for miscarriage of justice can be elusiv
as palpable
as wrongful convictions should be — the test for miscarriage of justice can be elusiv
as wrongful convictions should be — the
test for miscarriage of
justice can be elusive.
In the Henry
case in British Columbia, the government was able to pass the third step of the Oakes
test largely because, under the current rules, vouching is permitted: «Looking at the scheme
as a whole, taking into account the broad range of options available for proof of identity and residence,» wrote Madam
Justice Smith of the B.C. Supreme Court, «I am satisfied that there are no alternative, less drastic means of achieving both of Canada's legislative objectives in a real and substantial manner.»
In that
case,
Justice Frank Iacobucci said: «
As observed by the application judge, a contractual term may be implied «on the basis of the presumed intentions of the parties where necessary to give business efficacy to the contract or where it meets the «officious bystander
test.»