Not exact matches
In late March, Barclays agreed to pay just $ 2 billion in settling its
case around mortgage -
backed securities with the U.S.
Justice Department.
But the positive news is overshadowed by its ongoing legal
case and an impending multi-billion dollar fine from the U.S. Department of
Justice (DOJ) over the bank's selling of toxic mortgage -
backed securities ahead of the 2008 financial crisis.
While he admires
Justice Antonin Scalia's dissent in that
case, he wonders if we are not now reaping what Scalia sowed
back in 1990, with his opinion for the....
When we seek instead to «pay something
back to the victims and bring them closure,» we are doing a
justice either lower (as in civil - court
cases) or higher (as in repaying blood with blood)» but, in any
case, something that should not be a model for how we deal with criminals.
Instead,
justices unanimously decided to send their
case back to the lower courts.
Certainly, it remains the
case that the initial giver and society in general exert pressure on the recipient to give
back, in the name of
justice.
The conservative
justices fall
back on this well - worn staple of conservative jurisprudence: that the «right» here can not be found in the text of the Constitution or in any «tradition» marked in the accumulation of
cases over the years; and so the Constitution itself can not be the source of any such right that the judges have the authority to pronounce.
I can swallow insults, but I can also give them
back and when I give them
back, I often get victimised on a one - sided basis, the principles of natural
justice often do not apply in
cases pertaining to «insults» from KickAssFan, so u rather avoid my comments which are directed at Wenger, or amiably reply.
Opponents of acting Supreme Court
Justice Lori Sattler say she is unfit for elevation to a permanent seat in the court because she allowed evidence of a woman's abortion to be submitted in a custody
case back in 2013.
It appears that prosecutors have never made a criminal
case under this section of state election law, a violation of which would be a felony: Records going
back to 1999 show no arrests or arraignments on the charge, according to the State Division of Criminal
Justice Services.
Although the Perry v. United States
case was mostly focused on the legal
backing of the gradual move away from the gold standard, Chief
Justice Charles Evans Hughes» tongue - lashing: — RRB - of the government could as easy be interpreted as a lashing of debt abuse.
Gordon Brown appeared to
back justice secretary Jack Straw over home secretary Alan Johnson as he
backed government silence in the
case of killer Jon Venables.
Backing up the
Justice Department's
case were phone records documenting conversations between the Skelos family and Nassau County officials and Abtech and Glenwood executives — plus audio from wiretapped calls, seized emails and the testimony of Mr. Bonomo and Glenwood Management executive Charles Dorego.
He refused to jab
back at the governor for calling out the judiciary in such a public fashion (which sort of reminded me of President Obama's verbal slap at the US Supreme Court
justices at last year's State of the Union address over the Citizens United
case).
In 2013, in a 7 - 1 vote (
Justice Elena Kagan recused herself), the Supreme Court sent the
case back to the lower courts, saying they had failed to adequately determine that UT's use of race as a factor in its admissions was necessary and that the policy was «narrowly tailored.»
Open minded, open hearted and open to research, I walked into the Speed Dating venue with my head held high, my shoulders
back, and a small In the
case of Bilski and Warsaw v. Kappos,
Justice Stephen Breyer asked counsel whether he could patent a method of teaching that would keep 80
Ted Jr.'s doubts are shared by much of Paulie, including Sheriff Carl Daggett (J.D. Evermore), state senator Roland Foulkes (Michael O'Neill), and district attorney Sondra Person (Sharon Conley), all of whom believe that
justice was carried out
back in the mid -»90s and will again be as soon as the
case is rebuilt without the disputed DNA «technicality.»
In 1974, Supreme Court
Justice Thurgood Marshall captured this in a dissent in Milliken v. Bradley, a
case that rolled
back the desegregation efforts called for in Brown v. Board.
The plaintiffs plan to petition the court to rehear the
case once there are nine
justices back on the bench.
The Supreme Court issued a long - awaited decision yesterday in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, a seven - to - one ruling (
Justice Elena Kagan recused herself because she had worked on the
case as U.S. Solicitor General) that sends the affirmative action
case back to a lower court for further review.
Justices on Tuesday sent
cases from New Mexico and Colorado
back to their respective state supreme courts.
With today's ruling, Supreme Court
justices have sent the
case back to Superior Court where it likely will be tried.
Last month, the New York state attorney general filed a motion to combine two related New York
cases, one filed by a group called the New York City Parents Union and one brought by Partnership for Educational
Justice, a group
backed by former CNN anchor Campbell Brown.
Instead, the State Supreme Court
justices sent the
case back to the King County Superior Court «for an appropriate order.»
Not to mention the fact that the intake unit was located in the
Justice Center, two blocks from the courthouse, so in this
case doing someone else's work had started with a walk
back out into the rain.
So, to get
back to the question from yesterday's post of why should the Department of
Justice spend money on this investigation, they should do it in order to enforce the antitrust laws because consumers, authors and shareholders in the companies involved are being damaged by the price fixing, assuming the DoJ can prove its
case.
This month's best mysteries include a dark investigation
back through time, a
case of poetic
justice, a trip to an off - grid city for people who need to disappear and a masterful historical surrounding Alan Turing's death.
On the heels of that disappointing decision, I had the hop put
back in my step by Tony Mauro's account at The BLT of yesterday's House appropriations subcommittee hearing on the Supreme Court budget, where
Justices Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer appeared to make the
case for the court.
I've already sent out my cards to the
Justices, so let's take a look
back at some of the
cases decided by the Court with holiday - themed captions.
When that motion was denied, Milanes dismissed his own
case and then refiled it in Washington, where the
Justice Department asked to have it sent
back to Puerto Rico.
My very quick look at the
cases suggests that the Court picked up the «public use» element as a requirement for a taking
back in the days when the
Justices limited the legislature's authority to the «police power»; the idea is that a taking has to be a public use for it to fall within the police power.
I recently learned that,
back in October, recently - retired
Justice Marshall Rothstein gave a speech at the University of Saskatchewan, in which he criticized the «living tree» doctrine, which holds that the meaning of the Constitution may evolve over time — in most
cases, beyond what the text can reasonably bear.
Tags: bc injury law, Farbatuk v. Lagrimas, Madam
Justice Kloegman Posted in ICBC
Back Injury (soft tissue)
Cases, ICBC Soft Tissue Injury
Cases, ICBC Whiplash
Cases Direct Link Comments Off top ^
If these
cases get sent
back as well, good luck to those victims obtaining
justice in a country not particularly known for it (and I'm not just talking about criminal
justice).
On the
back of all this, the differently constituted Court of Appeal dealing with the damages
case held that the collection of errors by the judge did amount to gross and obvious irregularity which meant that flagrant denial of
justice did not have to be addressed.
Instead, according to the Chief
Justice, the
case should go
back to the Judicial Commission for a jury trial.
Though nothing can bring
back the person you have lost, seeking
justice through a wrongful death claim may bring closure to family members in such
cases.
October, 2014: Commerical Motor Vehicle Accident
Cases —
Back to the «B.A.S.I.C.s», Behavioral Analysis Safety Improvement Categories: Driver Fitness, Sleep Apnea, Fatigue Awareness Training, The Ohio Association For
Justice
In this week's Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we look
back on the key
cases and reflect on the impact of the death of
Justice Antonin Scalia.
Former Supreme Court
Justice Ian Binnie is fighting back after New Zealand's minister of justice slammed his report into compensation for a man cleared in one of the country's highest - profile murder
Justice Ian Binnie is fighting
back after New Zealand's minister of
justice slammed his report into compensation for a man cleared in one of the country's highest - profile murder
justice slammed his report into compensation for a man cleared in one of the country's highest - profile murder
cases.
In
case you haven't read Churchill's piece, (see The Volokh Conspiracy for a link), Churchill called it «Some People Push
Back: On the
Justice of Roosting Chickens» and wrote that the hijackers had:
The Minister of
Justice referred the
case back to the Ontario Court of Appeal.
Pulling
back rulemaking at the Department of
Justice does not stop any of the private suits, nor does it curtail the wide - open scope of liability under the perceived precedent of the Winn - Dixie
case [Minh Vu, Seyfarth Shaw]
A former employee filed a lawsuit over the events
back in 2006, but the
Justice Department declined to join the
case.
Other
justices indicated sympathy with the solicitor general's view that the
case should be sent
back to lower courts for further review.»
Tags: bc injury law, Gunson v. Sekhon, Mr.
Justice Grauer Posted in ICBC
Back Injury (soft tissue)
Cases Direct Link Comments Off top ^
Tags: bc injury law, Gordon v. Ahn, Mr.
Justice Bowden Posted in ICBC
Back Injury (soft tissue)
Cases, ICBC Soft Tissue Injury
Cases Direct Link Comments Off top ^
In the
case of Human Rights Commissions and their companion tribunals, these concerns about capacity of administrative
justice regimes to do a good job bring me
back to the central theme of the constitutional argument I have advanced in this paper.
Tags: bc injury law, Frequency of Medical Appointments, Mr.
Justice Dley, Proportionality, soft tissue injuries, Tarzwell v. Ewashina Posted in ICBC
Back Injury (soft tissue)
Cases, ICBC Shoulder Injury
Cases, ICBC Soft Tissue Injury
Cases, Uncategorized Direct Link Comments Off top ^
Tags: bc injury law, Madsen v. Bekker, Mr.
Justice Truscott, sacroiliac joint injury, SI Joint Injury Posted in ICBC
Back Injury (soft tissue)
Cases, ICBC Soft Tissue Injury
Cases, Uncategorized Direct Link Comments Off top ^