Sentences with phrase «justice under clause»

(a) complaints that would otherwise be referred to the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice under clauses 51.4 (13)(b) and 51.4 (18)(c), subclause 51.5 (8)(b)(ii) and clause 51.5 (10)(b) shall be referred to the Associate Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice, until the complaint is finally disposed of; and

Not exact matches

The Justice Department lawsuit will cite a provision of the U.S. Constitution known as the «Supremacy Clause,» under which federal laws trump state laws.

Although the Chief Justice acknowledged that this argument had some merit, the more determinative factor — and the key difference between the statutory immunity provisions relied upon by the ERCB and Alberta Environment — was that the immunity clause with respect to the former explicitly contemplated the regulator as an entity («the Board or a member of the Board...») whereas the immunity provisions under the Water Act and the EPEA did not (referring only to «persons» in various capacities; see paras 62 — 71).

Judge Graham expresses in his decision thoughts that by now should be quite familiar to our readers: «The Justices of the Supreme Court disagree among themselves on the proper role of religion in public life and the extent of the Court's authority to decide these issues under the Establishment Clause.

Under the test, first proposed by Supreme Court Justice Sandra O'Connor in a 1984 case from Pawtucket, Rhode Island, a display violates the Establishment Clause if it amounts to an official endorsement of religion, that is, if it suggests that the government approves a particular religious message (or disapproves such a message, though that issue does not regularly arise).

Four justices (from the liberal wing of the court) held that the mandate to purchase insurance counted as a regulation of commerce under the Commerce Clause.

The Articles of Impeachment were filed under obstruction of justice, violation of the foreign emoluments clause, violation of the domestic emoluments clause, undermining the federal judiciary and undermining the freedom of the press.

Write to your MP - www.WriteToThem.com makes it very easy - and tell him or her that you «refuse consent to having your information shared under any information sharing order», and ask him or her to vote to have Clause 152 removed entirely from the Coroners and Justice Bill.

«Having concluded that the Commissioner's implementation and usage of Education Law... is not unconstitutional under either Due Process Clause, the Court obviously must conclude that the statute is not unconstitutional on its face,» Acting Supreme Court Justice Roger D. McDonough wrote in his ruling.

Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the court and concluded his majority opinion by declaring: «We hold that imposing an increased sentence under the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act violates the Constitution's guarantee of due process.»

4 (3)(k) personal information contained in a court file, a record of a judge of the Court of Appeal of Alberta, the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta or The Provincial Court of Alberta, a record of a master in chambers of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, a record of a sitting justice of the peace or a presiding justice of the peace under the Justice of the Peace Act, a judicial administration record or a record relating to support services provided to the judges of any of the courts referred to in this justice of the peace or a presiding justice of the peace under the Justice of the Peace Act, a judicial administration record or a record relating to support services provided to the judges of any of the courts referred to in this justice of the peace under the Justice of the Peace Act, a judicial administration record or a record relating to support services provided to the judges of any of the courts referred to in this Justice of the Peace Act, a judicial administration record or a record relating to support services provided to the judges of any of the courts referred to in this clause.

(2) There shall be such additional offices of supernumerary judge of the Superior Court of Justice and member of the Family Court as are from time to time required, to be held by judges referred to in clauses (1)(d) and (e) who have elected under the Judges Act (Canada) to hold office only as supernumerary judges.

(3) If the Associate Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice or the regional senior judge appointed under clause 49 (2)(c) is the subject of a complaint, the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice shall appoint another judge of the Ontario Court of Justice to be a member of the Judicial Council instead of the Associate Chief Justice or regional senior judge, as the case may be, until the complaint is finally disposed of.

Justice Stratas simply looks past the literal reading of section 110 which clearly does place clause (c) as conjunctive with the notice provisions set out in clauses (a) and (b), when he rules «[n] othing in the legislative text of Rule 110 suggests that Rules 110 (a) and 110 (b) are prerequisites to an application for leave to intervene under Rule 110 (c)» (at para 16).

(13) If the Chief Justice makes a recommendation for removal under clause (8)(g), the Attorney General shall table the recommendation, including the ground on which the recommendation is made, in the Assembly.

(a. 1) fixing the number of judges of the Superior Court of Justice who are members of the Family Court appointed under clause 21.2 (1)(e);

(e) the judges of the Superior Court of Justice appointed to be members of the Family Court, the number of whom is fixed by regulation under clause 53 (1)(a. 1);

(2) A proceeding in the Small Claims Court shall not be transferred under clause (1)(d) to the Superior Court of Justice without the consent of the plaintiff in the proceeding in the Small Claims Court.

But in a strongly worded dissent on behalf of himself and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito, Chief Justice Roberts argued that such remedies under the Supremacy Clause should not be available, lest the Supremacy Clause provide litigants with a means of making an end - run around their inability to enforce section 30 (A)(the Medicaid statute's critical requirement that states fund Medicaid at levels sufficient to guarantee «equal access» to quality providers) either directly or via 42 U.S.C. § 1983.