In the meantime, Charles Krauthammer has written a surprisingly funny column on the very serious
Keystone pipeline issue titled Stop Jerking Canada Around that sums up matters nicely.
Not exact matches
And so, whatever the economic
issue — foreign direct investment, the GST, the
Keystone XL
pipeline — Trudeau links it to its implications on the middle class and bringing them better jobs.
So far, U.S. President Barack Obama's attempts at nuance on the
Keystone XL
pipeline issue have impressed no one: not the oil industry, not environmentalists and certainly not Canadians.
Days after refusing to
issue a permit for the
Keystone XL oil
pipeline, U.S. President Barack Obama threw his support behind the other big eco-controversy in America — hydraulic fracturing.
Environmentalists heartened by Barack Obama's refusal to
issue a permit for the
Keystone XL oil
pipeline didn't have long to bask in their victory.
The
issue of whether the oilsands would find a way to market has been a key
issue in the U.S. State Department's review of the
Keystone XL
pipeline.
As for the federal Conservatives, the last time Prime Minister Stephen Harper addressed the
issue of natural resource exports, he was lobbying for American support of TransCanada's
Keystone XL
pipeline.
The report came about a year - and - a-half after the department
issued a «final» report in August 2011 on
Keystone that said the
pipeline would cause minimal environmental impact.
The protest also comes amid continued activism by indigenous groups across the U.S., who have rallied over
issues ranging from sports mascots to environmental causes such as the Dakota Access and
Keystone XL oil
pipelines.
This, then, brings us to the very same «chicken and egg»
issue that has plagued the
Keystone XL
pipeline (KXL) and that has caused energy (and myriad other) analysts to spill tons of virtual ink over: Are
pipelines such as KXL and NGP simply one form of bringing oil to market (alongside rail, for example), or do they enable increased production?
Thus, the
Keystone XL
pipeline offered a win - win for producers and refiners, notwithstanding the environmental
issues along its route.
«The most immediate pressing
issue continues to be underperformance on the
Keystone pipeline in terms of volumes shipped.
Take a «simple»
issue like the
Keystone pipeline.
Rep. Bob Turner kept his attention on high gas prices, faulting Gillibrand for not championing the
issue of the controbersial
Keystone XL
pipeline.
To be sure, on most key
issues — including abortion, Obamacare, the
Keystone XL
pipeline and the Iran nuclear deal — Stefanik has been a reliable vote for the House Republican leadership.
In a sometimes fiery exchange that veered from the
issue of digital privacy to the contested
Keystone pipeline, both candidates often reverted back to negative attacks.
Representatives mostly peppered Moniz with questions that focused on hot - button energy
issues — including DOE's role in evaluating the controversial
Keystone pipeline and efforts to promote nuclear power — but the department's science programs also saw some time in the spotlight.
The reason that
Keystone got so much attention is not because that particular
pipeline is a make - or - break
issue for climate change, but because those who have looked at the science of climate change are scared and concerned about a general lack of sufficient movement to deal with the problem.
While Trump's stance on
issues like the
Keystone XL
pipeline bodes well for the oil and gas industry, the risks posed by a U.S. - led slump in global trade would likely far outweigh the increased volumes of crude that would flow across the border into the Gulf of Mexico — especially at today's depressed prices.
With a decision on the
Keystone XL
pipeline looming, it's a good time to think about how best to respond to the decision and what forms of civil disobedience will best highlight climate change as a moral
issue.
by Deborah McNamara on January 2, 2014 0 arctic drilling environmental
issues EPA greenhouse gas emissions
Keystone XL
pipeline National Journal ozone rule renewable energy standard
The temptation is to focus on
issues that inflame the public, like the
Keystone XL
pipeline, but the president would do better to take a wider perspective.
The fight over the
Keystone XL
pipeline is far from the only important
issue related to climate change, but it is a symbol in the making.
The
issue with that — and with obvious implications for the safety of the proposed
Keystone XL tar sands
pipeline — is, as Alex Moore of Friends of the Earth says (as have many other campaigners since Friday),
Jamie Henn, spokesperson with Tar Sands Action, which organized the protests, and co-founder of climate organization 350.org, told mongabay.com that,» the reason the
Keystone XL
pipeline has emerged as such a key fight is because it is on a specific time horizon, the Administration says it will
issue a decision by the end of this year, and the decision whether or not to grant the permit rests solely on President Obama's desk.
Reasons against the
Keystone pipeline were many and varied, from oil spill impacts to indigenous
issues.
Some have used civil disobedience in particular — I circulated the call for arrestees at the start of the
Keystone XL
pipeline demonstrations in 2011, and observers said the resulting two weeks of nonviolent direct action resulted in more arrests than any such demonstration on any
issue in many years.
On top of the environmental implications, the reason the
Keystone XL
pipeline has emerged as such a key fight is because it is on a specific time horizon, the Administration says it will
issue a decision by the end of this year, and the decision whether or not to grant the permit rests solely on President Obama's desk.
The scientists — more than a quarter of whom are from the United States —
issued a declaration of «10 Reasons for a Moratorium» on tar sands expansion and related projects such as the proposed
Keystone XL tar sands
pipeline.
On Friday, US Secretary of State John Kerry
issued his determination that «the national interest of the United States would be best served by denying TransCanada a presidential permit for the
Keystone XL
pipeline.
Better yet would be to debate an energy policy for the USA, including opening up exploratory oil and gas drilling including shale deposits, limiting the exponential growth of regulations currently stifling new exploration, ending the EPA regulatory war on coal, reactivating the
Keystone pipeline, etc.; these
issues have direct impact on American jobs and future energy independence, both of which are more important
issues for US voters (and presidential candidates) than any «climate» debate.
Obama also addressed what has been perhaps the biggest
issue of contention between his administration and climate activists: The pending decision whether to permit construction of the
Keystone XL
pipeline to transport larger volumes of oil from Canada's tar sands to the refining centers of Texas.
I'm not sure Kerry could become Secretary of State fast enough to influence the
Keystone XL
pipeline decision, but it is hard to believe he would not have raised this
issue with the President, since a go - ahead decision would immediately undercut the Administration's credibility on the climate
issue both at home and abroad.
At
issue was Lynch's support for the
Keystone pipeline.
I am active in groups that are focused on halting the expansion plans of the fossil fuel industries including the
Keystone XL
pipeline and yet the climate movement is still figuring out how a focus on local damages and pollution translate to action on the global long - term
issue.
And the
Keystone XL
pipeline permit is pending — something that probably would have sailed through the permitting process without a hitch had a national protest movement not been organized to raise the relevant
issues while raising the stakes politically on the decision.
The final version - to be
issued this summer - will likely conclude that the environmental concerns should not derail the project, despite troublesome leaks from the existing
Keystone pipeline, which was shut last week after a small leak in Kansas.
For examples of what ALEC has already been busy with this year, check out PR Watch's roundup of 77 anti-environmental ALEC bills that have popped up in state legislatures in 2013, supporting the
Keystone XL tar sands
pipeline project, rolling back renewable energy incentives and making it illegal to document animal abuse, among other
issues.
The State Department has just
issued a terribly flawed environmental review of the proposed
Keystone XL
pipeline that papers over its far - reaching impacts on climate and our environment.
~ John Kingston, writing about opposition to the
Keystone XL
pipeline for Platts, a leading source of information on global energy
issues
-LSB-...] NY Times story on
Keystone XLBy Andrew on July 26, 2011 This article on the debate over GHG emissions and the
Keystone XL
pipeline in the NYTimes does a really good job at highlighting the key
issues... and made my day by linking to my blog.
Energy security has been one of the key
issues in the discussion over the
Keystone XL
pipeline approval in the US — if you've not been following this, here's a great primer from CFR's Michael Levi.
For the past decade, Droitsch has worked on
issues related to tar sands development, first in Canada, then at NRDC, where she helped to lead the campaign to defeat the proposed
Keystone XL
pipeline.
This whole
issue of the
Keystone pipeline had generated, obviously, a lot of controversy and a lot of politics.
Last week the State Department released its assessment of the
Keystone XL
pipeline, and it was quite awkward for President Obama, who wants to appear solid on environmental
issues while also helping the economy.
During a stop in Oklahoma on a tour intended to promote his energy policies, Obama announced that he'll
issue an executive order to fast - track the southern portion of the
Keystone XL
pipeline.
In the latest
issue of the The New Yorker, Ryan Lizza tells the story of how Tom Steyer, «a fifty - six - year - old billionaire, former hedge - fund manager, and major donor to the Democratic Party» has thrown his clout and money behind the effort to stop the
Keystone XL
pipeline.
Mayors from across the country have sent a letter to Hillary Clinton, whose office has been rather quiet on the
issue, expressing their concern over the proposed
Keystone XL tar sands
pipeline.
The gut - check
issue for McKibben and his supporters — thousands of whom turned out for a mass demonstration in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 17 — is the
Keystone XL
pipeline, a 3,400 - mile pipe proposed by oil infrastructure company TransCanada that will allow crude oil extracted from the tar sands of Alberta, in southern Canada, to be refined on the Gulf of Mexico.
Others wonder what will happen to all of the passion directed at
Keystone XL once the
issue is settled, whether the
pipeline is permitted or not.