Not exact matches
So when somebody does something like that, I might respond in a way that to the middle -
aged white professor
seems really excessive, but in the life
of that
kid is really human — there's an incentive to reacting really harshly.
Right now it may
seem like an afternoon
of changing diapers and wiping noses has little to do with «the resistance,» but raising decent, compassionate
kids, and being faithful to the call to love them exactly as they are in exactly this moment, is the good work
of the Kingdom, in any
age.
I loved reading about her theatrics, as
kids these days
seem to have such imaginations in the
age of iPads and smart phones.
See what he does before I brand him as greedy but he
seems like a bit
of a dick 16
kids at the
age of 12, and sterling living in London could be a bad decision.
Jones is a wildcard
of course, but I couldn't tell you anything about him based on today other than that he looks athletic and
seemed to put some really good zip on the ball for a
kid his size /
age.
It
seems incredible to think a player
of such an
age was ready to pit his wits in the Championship, but apparently the
kid was playing against 18 - year - olds whilst he was just 12!
Kids from that era had the benefit
of growing up during an extreme cultural paradigm shift (e.g. feminist movement, deconstruction, dawn
of digital
age, etc) which
seemed to bring a fair amount
of empowerment with it, so maybe they've just been socialized to think that there supposed to be doing MORE than what they saw their mothers do.
Having a growth mindset
seems to be connected closely with the traits
of persistence, resilience and effort — habits we want our
kids to learn from an early
age.
and our faves around here are «Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood» (
seems to be a favorite
of all the
kids no matter what their
ages are) «Arthur» (great for preschoolers and early grade schoolers), and «Super Why» (great for the younger set learning their alphabet and letters, but older toddlers / preschoolers
seem bored by it).
Is that because these women are fertile, can still have
kids and generally look better the younger they are whereas men «
age better» (though most
of the guys I
seem to know are all bald or balding, but let's assume this is generally true)?
And somehow they (like
kids who nurse to or past the
age of 2)
seem to come out emotionally and physically normal.
Ames and Ilg observed that for
kids this
age, things
seemed to run on a 6 - month cycle
of equilibrium and disequilibrium.
For
kids of all
ages, the best strategy
seems to be an
age - appropriate and honest response to
kids» questions.
There is a pervasive idea that
kids have to be a certain way by a certain
age, and the plethora
of parenting books that purport to teach you how to get your
kid to sleep through the night by two weeks old (exaggerating) and what - not make parenting
seem like some kind
of technically - challenging secret thing, rather than just paying attention to your
kid.
Issues arose as
kids grew up - it
seemed to make more sense to have a co-op made up
of families with children
of a similar
age, since the older
kids were bored by going to the home
of a younger child.
I could look at other
kids her
age and see toddlers, and
of course cognitively I knew she was a toddler, but she still
seemed like my baby.
Book titles such as Coaching Your
Kids to Be Leaders: The Keys to Unlocking Their Potential, Developing Your Child's Emotional Intelligence: Self Control by
Age 3 in 10 Simple Steps, and
of course, How to Really Love Your Child (just in case you weren't sure) can make it
seem like no matter how well you think you're doing, there are still more mountains to climb to be the ultimate parent.
I thought he was ready, mostly based on his
age, what other people's
kids were doing at the time, and a vague bit
of hubris that he
seemed advanced in a few other areas (verbal, mostly) so clearrrrrrrrly he was going to train as soon as realistically possible.
There
kids were similar in
age to the boys, all had great names and they totally
seemed like my kind
of moms.
Hello, i
seem to have a bigger problem at hand... My son that is now almost 14 months old can't fall asleep as my other
kids did, ever since he was 5 months
of age and no one
seems to care.
I was surprised too, but after some research and careful trial with my research team (aka my
kids) in our lab (aka my kitchen), I have to agree that not only are
kids capable
of using «real knives» at a much younger
age than I expected but that there do
seem to be some psychological benefits as well.
What starts as a revenge tale unconvincingly morphs into a bitter, lonely middle -
aged man bonding with a young Indian
kid (whose parents don't
seem to feel one way or another about this weird man hanging out with their
kid alone in a hotel, giving him copies
of Maxim magazine).
Kids who play should probably be out
of of the single digit
ages, but Teen
seems excessive.
Stine's scary collections
of short stories are generally aimed at
kids about 9 to 12 years old, and the movie
seems to target that
age group as well.
It's too understated for that (in a good way), and while Carey Mulligan, Andrew Garlfield and Keira Knightley all deliver note - perfect performances (as do the three
kids playing them at a younger
age), it always
seemed to me like there was something kinda remote about them, which makes sense considering the nature
of their characters.
While teaching
kids to think critically in the information
age can
seem like a «monumental task,» Carl Hooker (@mrhooker) recommends this Stanford University study which «shows a variety
of activities shared with high school students to determine whether or not a news story is real or not.»
I've been begging for this app since my
kids picked up their first tablets — people
of all
ages seem to love YouTube, but until now it really wasn't safe for little ones to watch without strict supervision.
Once
kids hit the
age of 13, they
seem to be stuck between different worlds.
This is especially useful for supplying older
kids with some more appropriate content, as much of the Fire For Kids stuff seems aimed at children aged 8 and un
kids with some more appropriate content, as much
of the Fire For
Kids stuff seems aimed at children aged 8 and un
Kids stuff
seems aimed at children
aged 8 and under.
Best breed guess: heeler x collie (Mom is 53 lbs) Being fostered in: Weyburn Adoption fee: $ 300 ($ 100 refund once proof
of spay between 6 - 10 months
of age) Good with dogs: yes Good with cats: they don't
seem interested yet Good with
kids: yes!
Best breed guess: heeler x collie Being fostered in: Weyburn Adoption fee: $ 300 ($ 100 refund once proof
of neuter between the
age of 6 - 10 months) Good with dogs: yes Good with cats: they don't
seem interested yet Good with
kids: yes!
I brought two
of my
kids along for this challenge —
ages six and four — and they had a clear favorite, although the contest
seemed a little closer in my opinion.
Should you have to be a certain
age, earn a certain income, have a life plan, make premarital counseling mandatory, wait a certain amount
of time after applying for a marriage license, take a test (
of what, I'm not sure, but go with me here), take parenting classes if you plan to have
kids (since society doesn't
seem to care too much about childfree couples who divorce), learn how to communicate about finances, or all
of the above?
They reported that students
seemed to enjoy the MDI, and that it «hits a really important topic with
kids of this
age».
I still haven't gotten to the bottom
of the appeal
of kids» club, but it
seems to have something to do with young staff having endless energy for games and craft activities (unlike middle -
aged mummies).