At the time, laxer privacy settings across Facebook meant
Kogan had access to data from tens of millions more users after their friends had installed the app.
It also gathered data from their Facebook friends, which reportedly resulted in
Kogan having access to the data of millions of Facebook profiles.
Not exact matches
These actions
would prevent any app like
Kogan's from being able
to access as much Facebook
data today.
Global Science Research, the firm created by
Kogan,
had one day of
access to «a random sample of public tweets from a five - month period from December 2014
to April 2015,» but not any private
data, Twitter said.
The researcher at the center of the Facebook personal
data scandal, Aleksandr
Kogan, also briefly
had access to public
data from Twitter.
In 2013, a third - party app developer named Aleksandr
Kogan had access to 50 million Facebook users»
data for academic research, and without permission, he distributed it
to a consulting firm with ties
to the Trump Administration, Cambridge Analytica.
These actions
would prevent any app like
Kogan's from being able
to access so much
data today.
Yesterday Channel 4 News reported that it
had been able
to obtain some of the
data Kogan modeled for CA — thereby supporting Wylie's testimony that CA
had not locked down
access to the
data.
Kogan's app
would not be permitted
access to detailed friends»
data today.»
In 2014, Facebook changed the rules that
would prevent developers form
accessing data the way
Kogan did, and now Zuckerberg said the company will be approaching developers from before that time
to snuff out any other
data leaks.
Kogan's app
would not be permitted
access to detailed friends»
data today,» Facebook said.
Kogan's app
would not be permitted
access to detailed friends»
data today.»
Tayler served as the company's chief
data officer in 2015 when Facebook first raised concerns that Cambridge
had gained
access to the user
data via British academic Aleksandr
Kogan, in violation of the social network's terms of service.
Facebook said this week that up
to 87 million users — more than the 50 million users estimated by Wylie when he spoke
to the media outlets that reported on this issue in mid-March — may
have had their information
accessed by Cambridge Analytica, which obtained the
data from Cambridge University researcher
Kogan.
These actions
would prevent any app like Aleksandr
Kogan's from being able
to access so much
data today.
«These actions
would prevent any app like
Kogan's from being able
to access so much
data today,» he wrote.
The same day, Facebook said it
had hired forensic auditors
to examine whether Cambridge Analytica
had held on
to data allegedly passed
to it by an academic at Cambridge University, Aleksandr
Kogan, who gained
access to Facebook's platform for research purposes several years ago.
It denies there was a
data breach, and says it
had granted
Kogan permission
to access the information.
Facebook says that the information obtained by
Kogan was
accessed «in a legitimate way and through the proper channels that governed all developers on Facebook at that time,» and that it
has «made significant improvements in our ability
to detect and prevent violations by app developers,» in the last five years, requiring developers
to justify the use of the
data that they collect.
Thirdly, FB failed
to have adequate provisions in the contract between FB and
Kogan (or failed
to enforce those provisions) which
would have prevented
Kogan from using the
data FB allowed him
to access for any other purpose other than the one agreed between FB and
Kogan, namely academic purposes.
When reached for comment Monday, a Facebook spokeswoman sent along the following statement from Facebook VP of Global Operations Justin Osoksky: «It's important
to note that
Kogan's app
would not
have access to detailed friends»
data today.»
So the actions here that we're going
to do involve first, dramatically reducing the amount of
data that developers
have access to, so that apps and developers can't do what
Kogan did here.
As part of that push, apps which users haven't launched in three months will
have their
data access rights revoked, whereas no app will be able
to harvest anything outside of one's name, profile photo, and email address via a traditional Facebook Connect login such as the one used by Mr.
Kogan's quiz and numerous other apps like Uber, Disqus, and a wide variety of browser and mobile games.
Yesterday Channel 4 News reported that it
had been able
to obtain some of the
data Kogan modeled for CA — thereby supporting Wylie's testimony that CA
had not locked down
access to the
data.
While Zuckerberg claimed that since then Facebook
has overtime changed the way it platform functions
to «dramatically limit the
data apps could
access», it could not stop the breach of trust by
Kogan, who
had shared the
data collected through his apps with Cambridge Analytica.
The app was used by over 300,000 users on Facebook, but
Kogan also managed
to access the profile
data of other Facebook users, who were friends of those who
had used the app.
In my view, these requirements were not met when
Kogan deceived 270,000 users into thinking that their information
would be used solely for research, and then managed
to gain
access to 50 million of their friends, who
had no clue (and probably still don't) that their
data was harvested as well.
Facebook
has suggested that, at the time
Kogan gained
access to the
data of 270,000 users, Facebook's settings allowed third parties
to harvest everything from users and their friends, and thus there was no violation of the decree.
The heart of the matter is how an app created by Dr Aleksandr
Kogan was able
to access so much
data that could be used by groups for nefarious purposes, despite apparent guardrails Facebook
had put in place
to prevent such abuse.
About 270,000 people downloaded the app and gave
Kogan access to their
data, like city and content they
had liked.
When the app was downloaded,
Kogan had access not only
to users» basic information such as city of residence and details about friends, but also
data from the profiles of their Facebook friends.
Facebook says it dramatically limits the
access apps
have to friend
data, preventing the type of
data scoop
Kogan and others were capable of.