One would suppose that most of
the LD vote in a seat like this is left - leaning and that therefore Labour should win quite comfortably in 2015.
Not exact matches
ComRes have published a new poll of
voting intentions
in LD - Con
seats in the South West for ITV.
I found exactly the same pattern when I first asked the question
in this form for PoliticsHome, but the fact that it still produces the same pattern of results is very good news for the Liberal Democrats — it suggests that
in Con - v -
LD seats many (but not all) Labour supporters will still
vote LD tactically.
I believe
LD vote will be down
in such
seats but the Tory
vote will decrease more dueto so many suporters switching to UKIP.
In a normal voting intention question in Con - v - LD seats the Lib Dems are in third place on 18 %, asked using the constituency specific wording they are on 31
In a normal
voting intention question
in Con - v - LD seats the Lib Dems are in third place on 18 %, asked using the constituency specific wording they are on 31
in Con - v -
LD seats the Lib Dems are
in third place on 18 %, asked using the constituency specific wording they are on 31
in third place on 18 %, asked using the constituency specific wording they are on 31 %.
Well I don't think the Labour
vote fell
in many
seats outside Scotland except
in a few
LD - Con marginals.
On this basis it can be argued that the BNP cost Labour at least 9
seats in 2010: the
seats where Labour lost the
seat, and the winning margin was less than the margin of the BNP (
votes taken from Labour) over UKiP (
votes taken from Con /
LD): Amber Valley, Bradford East, Burnley, Corby, Dewsbury, Nuneaton, Sherwood, Thurrock, Warwickshire North (7 Conservative gains, 2 Lib Dem).
When her district's current state senator, Adam Driggs,
voted in favor of this year's discriminatory SB 1062, she made the decision to run for his
seat in the Senate so that her fellow
LD 28 constituents could be represented by someone who would advocate for the rights and dignity of all Arizonans.