From my limited perspective two of the strongest arguments against AGW are
the LOD problem and the fact that only ice sheet extension (hence, temperature) explains the correlation between Milankovitch Cycles and CO2 fluctuations in the ice cores; that is, T forces CO2 or both are forced in tandem by ice sheet extension.
It is
an LOD problem that is known by the devs that need to handle that.
And as far as I remember, there was no prominent
LOD problem in the release version.
Point me to mathematical examinations of
the LOD problems that you think debunk sea level rise and the human causes of climate disruption.
Not exact matches
The
problem is that the game wants to show both near and far
LOD (Level of Detail) objects.
Dr. Scafetta I thought it was clear from the graphs I linked: http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/Spectra.htm — First graph: there is no obvious 60 year component in the Global, Northern Hemisphere, CET and
LOD (2 CET periods show
problems of a short data set, where apparently single component is dissolved into three distinct CET periods of 55, 70 and 90 years).