Sentences with phrase «lwb when»

Under no circumstances should he have started contract rebel OX, and played Bellerin at LWB when we had the in - form Kolasinac fit for the game.

1) On the pitch: - we always start 3 -4-3 but always switch back to a back 4... it isn't tactical as we look bad in both - Bellerin playibg LWB when you have the best in the bundesliga last season on the bench - Welbeck playing the striker role when he can do everything but score when you have Lacazette a record signing on the - Monreal in back 3 when you have Kostafi who can flank Per in the middle protecting him against pace as well as having a commending figure and - Telling Xhaka to not play as a 3rd offensive player when Ramsey dashes - Playing a guy in Ox so out of position and persisting with him over preseason as if he would be there for years when it is clear he doesn't want to play for us (his case is a weird one)

Not exact matches

We played 2 LB as CB when they are both really good in the LWB position.

Why play Monreal and Sead as CD when they are both LWB?

He also plays players in wrong position ie Oxlade (when he was here) on LWB, Niles LW, Nelson RWB, Eleny as CB etc etc throughout the season.

* Playing Theo is the hardest thing to watch, would rather gamble with Neilson * The Ox would do a better job than Bellerin at RWB * Kola should be playing LWB * Ramsey is a different player when he starts & being an impact sub * Giroud & Laca should start together especially physical (away) games * Ozil is good but... well maybe should rotate with Iwobi * Xhaka should work on reducing costly errors * can't trust Monreal, seems like a target for our opponents wherever he plays they wan na go thru him!!!

In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)

It was upsetting to watch the CB selection when Chambers could have been used in CB freeing up Sead for LWB and having Ox RWB... It hurt us

The result of AMN playing LWB / LB has been the simple fact that he has gotten gametime when he wouldn't have as a CM.

But this season he has played 3 at the back when 4 was more suitable, relied to heavily on Xhaka, played Monreal as CB (he did admirably though), Adelaide at LWB, Nelson at RWB, started Welbeck over both Lacazette and Giroud against Liverpool WTF?

He did play for a brief period at the end of the year as a LWB, made the wrong choice when he got forward but is that signs of Wenger thinking about converting a player we already have as a CM into a LWB?

We didn't need a manager this season if we're just gonna put out the same players that come 5th anyone could of done what wenger is doing it's easy I buy lacazette then put he same team out from the same squad even when I have injuries it's easy just put out the rest of the squad and play them out of position I mean I'd take 8mil to do that oxlade at lwb kolansinac at cb elneny cm holding rcb there's no work of a manager there just put in players were others ain't ready to play then buy nobody else and do interviews with the same excuses job done next game change some ppl around but same ppl that came 5th then sell Alexis do interviews same excuses job done transfer window closes fans wish they never supported arsenal wenger laughing to the bank job done

Bellerin completely out of position again, when just like in the Stoke game, you have FOUR better options for the LWB position.

Monreal was getting forward more than he does when playing LB, funnily enough a LWB and a LB can look very similar to the stupid.

Kolasinac looks to be a perfect fit at either LB or LWB but needs a run of games in a settled formation.I believe he will improve considerably when he gets this first season under his belt NOTE Bergkamp Pires Henry

Sadly there are multiple major issues to address with Arsene being by far the biggest one, but since I've talked enough about him, I'll only mention the fact we played the Ox and moved Bellerin as a LWB, when we do have Kolasinac, and we knew the Ox was leaving.

Niles showed he can tackle while playing LWB / LB and can be our own kante if paired with ramsey or wilshere as he has shown himself to have the necessary discipline to know when to push forward or stay back.

just one more thing to note i don't understand why wenger keeps testing the lwb position, you have saed use him, when he came on the momentum changed in our favor our second choice lwb is obviously monreal?

How come Wenger is saying Kolasinac is more suited to a wing back role for a more offensive role when clearly he's not.Kolasinac is more of a left back to me than LWB just like how Debuchy is.LWB is more demanding and I feel the way he plays is not suited to LWB at all.Even Bellerin who I thought RWB would've suited him hasn't lived up to expectation though in his case I feel it's due to poor form.Bellerin's qualities suit either RB or RWB but not for Kolasinac or even Niles who to me will always be a CM who's just being used as right or left fullback.

When it comes to SWB versus LWB, you may be disappointed the seats in LWB models don't add much more space for occupants.

Quick reaction to market demand was exercised when at the Detroit Motor Show in January 2001 the Bentley Arnage Red Label lwb was launched as a standard model.

For the normal human being, when it comes to a car's interior, it doesn't get any better than the new Mercedes - Benz S - Class, especially if we're talking about the LWB version with the reclining rear seats package.