Sentences with phrase «labelling people makes»

James — «Labelling people makes it easier to dismiss them... when we are afraid we might be wrong about our own beliefs... simple laziness.»

Not exact matches

They thought the tourist aspect would make the store worth it, but they found, on a day - to - day basis, people wanted to buy the more inexpensive candy bar with a local label to give as vacation gifts.

His music made money for countless people who worked in his industry — the ticket sellers, studio musicians, streaming services, distributors, and recording labels.

Sticking with our recent articles on Amazon private label selling and market traction, I thought I would talk with an actual million dollar private label brand, who is finding success, through methods like developing original products, and share that with you.I talked with Raj Jana, the Founder of JavaPresse Coffee Company, who is building a brand that creates meaningful products and experiences that help people make the most of the moments they love, which starts with the ritual of making and drinking one perfect cup of coffee every single day.

Bill Slawski of SEOByTheSea — «I'm finally starting to see more people acknowledge how important the structure and taxonomy of a site is to SEO, from organizing the pages of a site in a manner that makes it as easy as possible for a search engine to crawl the pages of a site, to choosing the right words and phrases to label and organize that content, in as customer friendly manner as possible.

If it's making people hear voices that aren't really there, shouldn't there be a warning label or something on religion?

Naming / defining is an exercise of power over others, so perhaps naming other persons made in the Divine image, with the potential to become godlike, by labeling them «believers» or «unbelievers» is a failure to see all people as God sees them, children of the one true God.

That being said, some of the hatred that comes from fundamentalist Christianity makes me cringe to take that label, because it makes it harder to convince people that I and God can love them as soon as the word is uttered.

Luke and his great reversals: Jesus, Luke illustrates, makes it frustratingly difficult to label people.

Far left people do this a lot... They make generalizations, don't give specifics and label with little to no evidence.

By labeling people groups (i.e., Christians) in negative ways, it makes it easier for one group (liberals?)

What I don't get is, being critical of Zionistic policies, agenda or people is quickly labeled as «anti-semitic» and is even considered illegal in countries like Germany, yet a bigoted person like Geert Wilders (who has not once consulted any expect or scholar on Islam) can make a video which literally embodies everything that hate, racism, and ignorance is about, and yet get away with it where the court recognizes it as «denigrating» but not «illegal»!?

And yes, this whole atrocity has been labeled historically as the «Reign of TERROR»... all happening a little over 200 years ago (and people still prefer to make a stink about the Crusades that happened 1000 years ago).

Before I enumerate them let me make it clear that today I despise the practice of dehumanizing an individual or group of people by labeling them....

There are also agnostics, who believe that we don't know if there is a «God»; and there are theists, who believe that there is a higher power, but don't believe religion's claims that he / she / it interacts with us or directs our paths in an afterlife; and there are people with no label to their beliefs, who believe that we are on our own here on Earth to make it as good a place as we can.

I would suggest that by attaching labels to people it makes it easier to de-humanise and therefore easier to insult and offend.

stop playing this make belief games for once and for all... We lable / have labeled people who talk talk to imaginary persons in the mental hospitals or on the street.

«as we discuss different religions as we do here on the blogs, making strategic evaluations about people and groups, without over-generalizing and labeling them, is a useful and valuable skill to have»... Of course that's true.

You Said:» «as we discuss different religions as we do here on the blogs, making strategic evaluations about people and groups, without over-generalizing and labeling them, is a useful and valuable skill to have»... Of course that's true.

When a person exhibits too much passion over anything — God, a political movement, the latest in tattoos or a popular television show — we label that person as obsessive or compulsive, and mutter, «Get a life» Might we better understand zeal as Isaiah does, as the prerogative of God, who, despite the mess we've made of things, still chooses to care for this battered creation and our faulty selves?

It's a loaded, closed - ended question that requires making a sweeping pronouncement on a group of people that is far too diverse and varied to earn a single label.

The more things we label «must haves» the more we de-power people by making it increasingly difficult from them to build communities (churches) in their tribes.

Diagnoses were made on the basis of symptoms, and persons with a certain cluster of symptoms were given a label in the conviction that a particular cause might be found for that «disease.»

I know, David: «usurper, temptress, child» or «broad, twinkie, manga - eyed waif», it's all labeling women instead of interacting with them as people made in the image of God.

Whether formulated by Durkheim (a system of beliefs and practices related to sacred things), by Weber (that which finally makes events meaningful), or by Tillich (whatever is of ultimate concern) religion in its «classical» sense refers not so much to labels on a church building as to the imagery (myth, theology, and so forth) by which people make sense of their lives — their «moral architecture,» if you will.6 That human beings differ in their sensitivity to and success in this matter of «establishing meaning» there can be no doubt.

This is clear cut and most people (except that small group that can't make up their mind) can self - identifiy without the baggage heaped on the «atheist» label by the anti-theists.

Being an atheist doesn't make you a bad person, it's just that it doesn't really do anything more than provide you a label.

Just remember that they are people, not just Atheists, Agnostics, homosexuals, prostitutes, strippers, drunks, and other easy labels that can be used to define a person, and make them less than people.

When your social environment is encouraging you to make these labels the basis for loving some people and hating others, criticize your social environment and seek to change it.

God made each person unique, and without adjectives (label) we would fail to see one another's God - given gifts.

Ever notice that when we label a person (or a team, a church, etc) it rarely makes anything better?

Obviously everyone needs to make their own decisions about how they eat and why, but I don't think it could hurt for people to be a bit more knowledgeable about what these labels actually mean and respect the people choosing / having to eat by them.

Helen — It's not about lack of empathy for people who can not eat things they wish they could; my goal when making things that fall under these labels is that they should be so good that you'd eat them regardless of dietary limitations.

Farace believes the people behind the label make a difference in creating brand loyalty and generating growth.

... It is very difficult in my country to find the ingredients, most of the products in the supermarkets aren't labeled with «gluten free», also, my country, Venezuela, is in the middle of a humanitarian crisis and that makes it even worse for people with special diets right now.

IBWSS UK provides the platform to make the contacts with the right businesses and people to help you get new private label brands to market faster than the competition.

Whilst EU - wide labelling legislation has made it much easier for people to identify safe foods and gluten free provision in restaurants is generally improving, maintaining standards and safety in gluten free production is key to providing assurances for consumers.

If maltodextrin is made from wheat, food labels will indicate that fact to protect people who are allergic to wheat.

«Because consumers could be confused by the new label with its numerous changes, a robust consumer education effort will be needed to ensure that people continue to understand how the revised label can be used to make informed choices and maintain healthful dietary practices.

So many people look at calories only and make horrible food decisions and it's just kind of sad cuz just reading a little more of the nutrition label or the ingredient give yous so much more important information!

So giving people the chance to make healthy food choices — with clear labelling of menus and food packaging — is more important than ever.

On the subject of efforts made to optimise and adapt packaging to emphasise healthier products Andy added, «yes we have looked at portion control, labelling, highlighting calories and it does make a difference to what people choose.»

Fair Trade USA labeled products were made with respect to both people and planet.

High levels of diet - related chronic diseases in the UK, including heart disease, mean it's essential we have clear and consistent food labeling so people can make healthy choices.

The new label aims to make it easier for people to make healthier choices.

People will now find it easier to make healthier choices about the food they eat with the new consistent front of pack nutritional label launched today by Public Health Minister Anna Soubry.

That's the decision the commonwealth has made as one of the votes at that table, but we do want industry and public health people to work together to look at a form of interpretive front of pack labelling.

Research shows that, of all the current schemes, people like this label the most and they can use the information to make healthier choices.

People will now find it easier to make healthier choices about the food they eat with the new consistent front of pack nutritional label.

suarez missed one too but the people here like bandwagons and the bandwagon from ox is «he misses chances» so even if he played really well and made one miss, they would label him as the non-improving british player who always misses, yeah somewhat they are right i accept that, but lets be objective in this half he played really well