He rejects the hard - headed instincts of previous leaders, while his commitment to
Labour as a party of government is ambiguous.
If it wasn't for FPTP
Labour as a party of government would already be dead and buried.
Not exact matches
The opposition
Labour Party, which requested the figures under freedom
of information, said they showed the
government's «utter failure» in ensuring wealthy people and large corporations pay
as much tax
as they should.
Yanis Varoufakis: Isn't it astonishing that after Jeremy Corbyn was being described
as «the longest suicide note by the
Labour Party» about a year ago, today there is an air
of inevitability in a Corbyn - led
government.
«It may not go down well in international diplomacy... but in the
Labour party it will be welcomed
as a rare flash
of honesty from a senior member
of the
government,» Peter Kilfoyle said.
... Delight in smooth - sounding platitudes, refusal to face unpleasant facts, desire for popularity and electoral success irrespective
of the vital interests
of the State, genuine love
of peace and pathetic belief that love can be its sole foundation, obvious lack
of intellectual vigour in both leaders
of the British Coalition
Government, marked ignorance
of Europe and aversion from its problems in Mr. Baldwin, the strong and violent pacifism which at this time dominated the
Labour - Socialist
Party, the utter devotion
of the Liberals to sentiment apart from reality, the failure and worse than failure
of Mr. Lloyd George, the erstwhile great war - time leader, to address himself to the continuity
of his work, the whole supported by overwhelming majorities in both Houses
of Parliament: all these constituted a picture
of British fatuity and fecklessness which, though devoid
of guile, was not devoid
of guilt, and, though free from wickedness or evil design, played a definite part in the unleashing upon the world
of horrors and miseries which, even so far
as they have unfolded, are already beyond comparison in human experience.
Luke, you don't seem to have much confidence in
Labour as a
party that can retain popular support if the Lib Dems got a share
of government.
A left - leaning coalition - formal or informal - will have around five
parties, with deep splits over single market membership and free movement, and with the SNP existentially needing to portray Westminster (especially a
Labour government in Westminster)
as being out
of touch with Scotland.
Specifically with regards the
Labour Party, we're seen as the party of government, not the party of the pe
Party, we're seen
as the
party of government, not the party of the pe
party of government, not the
party of the pe
party of the people.
The most important thing is that analysing past elections & predicting future elections is ridiculous, since electoral reform will hopefully change the political
parties and the political process anyway, to make them more responsive to the genuine majority view, instead
of the tribal attitude we see when Paul suggests that we should keep FPTP
as the best way
of electing a
Labour government.
Harold Wilson in the mid-1970s referred to
Labour as the «natural
party of government» too.
[4] He served on the front bench but was not invited by Winston Churchill to join the Coalition
government in 1940;
as one
of the most senior
Labour figures not in office, the responsibilities
of running the
party were given to him.
He was the acting Leader
of the Opposition and Leader
of the
Labour Party (
as chairman
of the Parliamentary
Labour Party) from 1940 during the time Clement Attlee was in
government.
Writing in the New Statesman,
Labour Shadow Justice Secretary Sadiq Khan brazenly declares that the Liberal Democrat's record in
Government has left
Labour as the
party of civil liberties.
Following the resignation
of Gordon Brown
as Prime Minister and Leader
of the
Labour Party on 11 May 2010, Harman automatically became the temporary leader of the party as well as the Leader of the Opposition, entitling her to the salary and government car that come with the
Party on 11 May 2010, Harman automatically became the temporary leader
of the
party as well as the Leader of the Opposition, entitling her to the salary and government car that come with the
party as well
as the Leader
of the Opposition, entitling her to the salary and
government car that come with the role.
But a lot
of this is
Labour's doing, since
as long
as Ed Miliband's
party refuses to sign up for the
government motion,
government backbench doubters have that much more power to extract concessions.
All this means that if a leadership challenge takes place it will quite probably determine whether or not the
Labour Party goes forward as a viable party of govern
Party goes forward
as a viable
party of govern
party of government.
[22] Gardiner,
as spokesman for the
Labour Party, seized on this information and accused Boeing
of hypocrisy, insisting that all aircraft manufacturers require
government subsidies; he labelled the company «the king
of corporate welfare» and a «subsidy junkie».
As a matter of policy, many early Labour MPs such as Will Thorne and Herbert Morrison spurned the Liberal Party's support of free trade, «frankly recognising that control over imports represented a more logical policy for a socialist government than free trade» (Pugh 2010: 29
As a matter
of policy, many early
Labour MPs such
as Will Thorne and Herbert Morrison spurned the Liberal Party's support of free trade, «frankly recognising that control over imports represented a more logical policy for a socialist government than free trade» (Pugh 2010: 29
as Will Thorne and Herbert Morrison spurned the Liberal
Party's support
of free trade, «frankly recognising that control over imports represented a more logical policy for a socialist
government than free trade» (Pugh 2010: 29).
There is a good reason for this: most
of the current Conservative policies have their antecedents in the policies
of the last
Labour government and the
Labour Party is just
as tied - up with private interests
as are the Conservatives.
While I am the first to admit that the
Labour Party's prospects of forming a government in the near future are not propitious, I know that the party will eventually emerge from its internecine struggle and present itself ready for government — as it has done after every period of civil war in its his
Party's prospects
of forming a
government in the near future are not propitious, I know that the
party will eventually emerge from its internecine struggle and present itself ready for government — as it has done after every period of civil war in its his
party will eventually emerge from its internecine struggle and present itself ready for
government —
as it has done after every period
of civil war in its history.
From 1985, when this former London Weekend Television producer arrived
as director
of campaigns and communications at
Labour's then headquarters in Walworth Road, south London, Mandelson worked closely with both Brown and Tony Blair, the two MPs who - in that order - he believed would lead the
party into
government.
If they signalled they wouldn't do so, two immediate points
of interest come to mind: 1) If
Labour were the largest
party, or even in a whole UK majority, but the Tories were the largest rump UK
party, the Liberal Democrats could more easily claim a renewed coalition with the Conservatives was preferable to a centre - left alliance, since a
government that would lose its majority within a year would be unable to govern effectively; 2) A
Labour or
Labour - led
government following a «yes» vote would have an incentive to push back the date
of independence
as far
as possible.
[5] The investigation continued to have political impact throughout,
as a range
of stories continued to leak from the police investigation and damaged the
government and
Labour Party.
Following the election
of Tony Blair
as Labour leader in July 1994 after the death
of his predecessor John Smith, Ashdown pursued co-operation between the two
parties because he wanted to form a coalition
government should the next general election end without any
party having an overall majority.
Tony Blair had famously never held a
government position before becoming Prime Minister,
as the
Labour Party had been out
of power for the entire duration
of his career
as an MP.
I am sure there are some
Labour politicians who are sound on civil liberties,
as there are also in the other
parties, but given the record
of Labour in
government and the record
of Tories in opposition (oh, how they cared back then) the evidence is emphatic: the state can not be trusted, and the politicians are either incapable or unwilling to control or restrain the state machinery.
Chris Leslie, the former shadow chancellor who is backing the Soubry amendments, said there was a good chance the
government would be defeated
as he was «reasonably confident that the shadow cabinet and rest
of the parliamentary
Labour party» supported staying in the customs union.
As I found in Project Red Alert, my research on
Labour's prospects at the end
of last year, a third
of those who would consider voting
Labour say the
party hasn't yet learned the right lessons from what went wrong during its time in
government, and can not yet be trusted to run the country again.
Milliband should be clear that there will be no in - out referendum under a
Labour government because we are for the EU, Labour is the party of Europe, but we want, in alliance with labour movements throughout the EU, to renegotiate its founding treaties which are currently tearing it apart in accordance with our own socialist principles such as an EU - wide living wage and EU - wide full emplo
Labour government because we are for the EU,
Labour is the party of Europe, but we want, in alliance with labour movements throughout the EU, to renegotiate its founding treaties which are currently tearing it apart in accordance with our own socialist principles such as an EU - wide living wage and EU - wide full emplo
Labour is the
party of Europe, but we want, in alliance with
labour movements throughout the EU, to renegotiate its founding treaties which are currently tearing it apart in accordance with our own socialist principles such as an EU - wide living wage and EU - wide full emplo
labour movements throughout the EU, to renegotiate its founding treaties which are currently tearing it apart in accordance with our own socialist principles such
as an EU - wide living wage and EU - wide full employment.
A minority
Labour government would also be feasible if the Liberal Democrats emerged
as the
party of the median MP, provided that the latter abandoned their current alliance with the Conservatives in favour
of one with
Labour.
The lesson
of the election is that
Labour can't and mustn't be a
party which only does community campaigning at election time, or that sees changes in central
government policy
as the only way to persuade people to support them.
- Certainly my view is that
Labour should offer and advocate legislation and a referendum on AV + and expect its MPs to back that
as a confidence measure, and that the
government and
party leadership would advocate a yes (with a small number
of rebels no doubt on the no side in the referendum itself).
Our children are going to have to pay higher taxes for years
as a result
of irresponsible spending by the last
government - and in case you think I'm biased - I was a card carrying
Labour party member until I found out how much we are in debt due to overspending on such things
as CTF.
There were two political shocks in Britain in 2015 — the Tories being able to form a majority
government and the election
of Jeremy Corbyn
as leader
of the
Labour Party.
It comes
as a series
of new polls suggest that the
party are making no progress in the marginal seats they need to win from
Labour in order to form the next
government.
Following the General Election, and after failing to persuade the Lib Dems to form a coalition
government with
Labour, Gordon Brown resigned
as Prime Minister and leader
of the
party on 11th May 2010.
The other standard trackers all paint an equally bleak picture for the
government, on the forced choice question (which I always tend to think
of our best indicator
of which way tactical voting is likely to go next time round, given that there are no regular tracker questions that ask directly about it) the Conservatives now enjoy a 12 point lead over
Labour, they have an 8 point lead
as the
party most likely to run the economy well, David Cameron has an 8 point lead
as Best Prime Minister.
Voters in the south no longer see
Labour as the
party of fairness and believe they get «little or nothing» back from
government from their taxes, a report to be published next month will argue.
«I don't think the public see the
Labour Party led by Jeremy Corbyn at the moment as being a credible party of Government,» said Mr Murray, the shadow Scottish secre
Party led by Jeremy Corbyn at the moment
as being a credible
party of Government,» said Mr Murray, the shadow Scottish secre
party of Government,» said Mr Murray, the shadow Scottish secretary.
In a thinly veiled dig at Mr Corbyn's tendency to speak only to his supporters, rather than to the country
as a whole, Mr Khan says he is desperate to win on Thursday to show
Labour can become a
party of government again.
But it is no coincidence that a Conservative administration, hardly famous for craving constitutional modernisation, has chosen
as a matter
of priority to enact changes that damage the
Labour party's prospects
of electoral recovery and lay the foundations for a long - term Conservative monopoly on
government.
How about that guy who stood for election on the basis that we «need a living breathing
party ``, who thought last time round «
Labour felt
as if it was in
government despite its members, not because
of them ``?
The 2014 Local Elections saw a
Labour Party — which was part of a coalition government with Fine Gael — fare poorly, with its national share of the vote dropping to just over seven percent and with its position as the leading left wing party being usurped by a major contender for this position, namely Sinn
Party — which was part
of a coalition
government with Fine Gael — fare poorly, with its national share
of the vote dropping to just over seven percent and with its position
as the leading left wing
party being usurped by a major contender for this position, namely Sinn
party being usurped by a major contender for this position, namely Sinn Fein.
The 1985 Local Elections saw a
Labour Party — which was part of a coalition government with Fine Gael — fare poorly, with its national share of the vote dropping to just over seven percent and with its position as the leading left wing party being usurped by a major contender for this position, namely the Workers P
Party — which was part
of a coalition
government with Fine Gael — fare poorly, with its national share
of the vote dropping to just over seven percent and with its position
as the leading left wing
party being usurped by a major contender for this position, namely the Workers P
party being usurped by a major contender for this position, namely the Workers
PartyParty.
Time and time again I have stepped before the cameras to sincerely defend your reputation in the interests
of the
Labour Party and the
Government as a whole.
If current predictions are correct, it's more than likely that a
Labour government will be formed despite having failed to emerge
as the largest
party in either England or Scotland in terms
of votes or seats.
John Mills, the millionaire
party donor who is funding
Labour for a referendum campaign, said: «I want to see a
Labour government in 2015 and,
as the
party that trusts the people, I think we should recognise that the growth
of the EU's influence over Britain in the past 40 years warrants a referendum regardless
of future events.»
The more seats a
party or grouping has, the more chance it has of forming a government - with 198 seats out of 646 the Conservative Party could only form a government if significant numbers of other MP's decided to back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13
party or grouping has, the more chance it has
of forming a
government - with 198 seats out
of 646 the Conservative
Party could only form a government if significant numbers of other MP's decided to back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13
Party could only form a
government if significant numbers
of other MP's decided to back them,
as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main
party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13
party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with
Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it
as an opportunity to allow
Labour into
government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event
of the next election going exactly the same way in terms
of votes then 214 out
of 650 is 32.93 %
of seats compared to at 198 out
of 646 seats - 30.65 %
of seats and the Conservative
Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13
Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a
government allowing for the greater number
of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need
Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a
government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back
Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing
of an extra 10 - 13 MP's.
It adds: «So it is with a heavy heart that we urge you, for the sake
of the
Labour party and for the people in our country who need a
Labour government, to reconsider your position
as Labour leader.»