Not exact matches
Labour have only been out of power for two years, having left Britain with the
biggest deficit in the OECD, and yet YouGov polling throughout the early half of May 2012 have put
Labour between nine and thirteen points ahead of the Conservatives, giving
Labour a more than comfortable majority at the next General Election.
So let me be clear, in tough times — when there is less money around and a
big deficit to get down — there will be no blank cheque from me as a
Labour Chancellor for this project or for any project.
Labour also said today they would pledge better value for public money while making no
big spending commitments in a bid to reduce a record budget
deficit.
The IFS said that the Conservative plans to get rid of «the bulk» of the
deficit over the course of the next parliament will involve the
biggest spending cuts since the second world war, while
Labour and Lib Dem plans will result in deeper cuts that at any time since the 1970s.
It goes like this:
Labour bequeathed the
biggest postwar
deficit in our history;
Labour had no plan to tackle it; the measures announced in the emergency Budget by George Osborne in June are fair and unavoidable, and a mess created by one party alone is having to be cleared up by two working together.
In his first
big speech as shadow chancellor this morning, Alan Johnson tried to refute the Coalition's suggestion that
Labour is responsible for the budget
deficit.
Under the
deficit reduction plans that Ed Miliband put in
Labour's manifesto last year, the
biggest reductions in public spending would come this year — so much for the «wrong time».
Their strident argument on the economy was that
big cuts needed to be made to pay off the
deficit, but that New
Labour would ease the pain by cutting «less far, less fast».
«This is the alternative
Labour's got to set out and we do have to make an argument that says tax should play a
bigger part of closing the
deficit.