Which means reversing loss of support to new insurgents could be vital to determining whether
Labour forms the next government.
Not exact matches
That's why the central task of the whole
Labour party, must be to rebuild trust and support to win the
next general election and
form the
next government.
The Scottish
Labour leadership contest this autumn is important for the entire
Labour Party in Britain, because how the party performs in Scotland will be a significant factor in whether
Labour can
form the
next UK
government.
Only when these negotiations failed did Heath resign, and
Labour, the largest party by five seats, was invited to
form the
next government.
Following the election of Tony Blair as
Labour leader in July 1994 after the death of his predecessor John Smith, Ashdown pursued co-operation between the two parties because he wanted to
form a coalition
government should the
next general election end without any party having an overall majority.
These changes would constitute a massive shift in how the UK is governed and is likely to be heavily resisted by the
Labour party as it would place huge and possibly terminal restrictions on their powers should they
form the
next government in 2015.
It comes as a series of new polls suggest that the party are making no progress in the marginal seats they need to win from
Labour in order to
form the
next government.
Labour's Scottish executive committee chairwoman Cathy Peattie said: «Our
next deputy leader in Scotland will have a crucial role in supporting Richard Leonard as we seek to
form a
government at British and Scottish levels, to deliver an economy that works for the many, not the few.»
Even if it comes to office with a healthy majority, when the
next Conservative
government is
formed, serious consideration should be given to offering
Labour MP Frank Field the position of Secretary of State for Work and Pensions.
The more seats a party or grouping has, the more chance it has of
forming a
government - with 198 seats out of 646 the Conservative Party could only
form a
government if significant numbers of other MP's decided to back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to
form a coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with
Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow
Labour into
government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the
next election going exactly the same way in terms of votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to
form a
government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need
Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone
forming a
government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back
Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13 MP's.
«I am therefore appointing Ian Lavery, Co-National Campaign Coordinator, to the additional role of
Labour party chair to strengthen our campaigning and party organisation, as we prepare to contest a new general election and
form the
next government.»
Their concerns date back to those five febrile days in May after the cliffhanger poll result left the future of the country in the balance as Cameron, Clegg and
Labour negotiators bartered behind closed doors over who would
form the
next government.
Meanwhile his decision to repeatedly state that the party with the largest number of seats should
form the
next government is set to undermine the legitimacy of any minority
Labour government should we see one
next month.
If
Labour are to
form a coalition
government with the Lib Dems following the
next election, then I would rather deal with Clegg than Cable.
Labour needs economic credibility to
form the
next government.
Labour will need to win 68 back at the
next election to
form a majority
government.
They need a united
Labour party in Holyrood that is fighting the SNP and ready to
form Scotland's
next government.
The weakness of the offer on the NHS is one reason why it isn't even clear that
Labour will
form or lead the
next government, or have a majority large enough to push through the changes we want.
He resigned the
next morning and Ramsay MacDonald
formed the first
Labour government, but that only lasted nine months.
While winning economic credibility should remain a
Labour priority and I've written in the current Progress magazine on how this might be done, it may be that a perceived dearth of authenticity, rather than economic credibility, is the most immediate cause of a heightened risk that
Labour will not
form the
next government.
Whilst I don't think this strategy would be a road to win Holyrood it would be a way to rebuild in their old heartlands in the central belt and break the SNP hegemony as when
Labour does
next form a
government they probably will need a decent showing in Scotland to get a majority.