To imply otherwise is misleading and undermines the confidence of teachers in using the tough powers the last
Labour government gave them.
The previous
Labour government gave an undertaken not to review the # 3,000 cap until 2009 at the earliest, and to permit increases above this level, other than raising it in line with inflation, only with the approval of both Houses of Parliament.
In 1997, the new
Labour Government gave the Bank of England the power to set interest rates.
In 1998
the Labour Government gave national devolution to Scotland and Wales.
The switch would also see
a Labour government give the green light to schools wanting to extend school term lengths - a recent proposal of Gove's - and allow them to change the way they buy their services.
Not exact matches
The net effect of the Ontario
government's new policy is to subsidize jobs in an already strong
labour market, increase the wages of already high - income workers and
give hundreds of millions of dollars in corporate welfare to one of the largest and most profitable companies in the world.
The problem, which the federal
government denies, lies in the significance
given to a certificate called the
Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA).
While
Labour Day evolved into a celebration of work, employers and life, May Day was a protest against the status quo,
government, corporations and other institutions that refused to
give working people their deserved share of the economic pie.
The letter comes just a day before
Labour MP Frank Field tables his School Holidays (Meals and Activities) Bill, which calls on the
Government to
give all councils the duty and resources to provide food and activities during the school holidays, for children who would otherwise go hungry.
in the context of the present
government policy of high - tech development based on the global free market, the dalits, the tribals and the fisherfolk are increasingly getting alienated from the Land, the Forest and the Water - sources respectively which have been
giving them their living, and are also getting uprooted from their habitat and culture; and women are commoditized and their sexuality, fertility and
labour are increasingly commercialized.
Even if the
Government were to implement
Labour's growth plan now,
given the failure of the last three years it would not avoid the need for cuts in departmental spending in the next Parliament.
If the economy was producing at a level below its capacity,
given the existing stock of capital and
labour, a proper
government policy could increase output until it approached the economy's full potential.»
Labour is struggling to claw back the perception of «economic competence» it needs to persuade voters to
give it another chance, even as public opinion has turned against further
government austerity.
«Now the Bribery Act is in force it's essential for the
government to
give the Serious Fraud Office the political and financial backing it needs to investigate and prosecute,»
Labour MP Hugh Bayley told politics.co.uk.
Labour's deputy leader was
given a standing ovation as he delivered an impassioned defence of the New
Labour government.
«The next
Labour government will ensure the minimum wage is properly enforced, including by
giving local authorities new powers, and would set a more ambitious target with an # 8 minimum wage where its value has been eroded and undermined in recent years,» Murray says.
The
Labour leader said: «I welcome the prime minister's decision to
give the British people the chance to vote for a
government that will put the interests of the majority first.»
With neither
Labour nor the Conservatives likely to be capable of forming a majority
government and
given the SNP's fragmented unionist opponents north of the border, Britain's first - past - the - post electoral system could allow Nicola Sturgeon's party to exact a high price for support of a
government in the Commons.
English MPs would be
given the opportunity of voting down anything they don't like being imposed by a
Labour government propped up, say, by MPs in Scotland.
At that point, a
Labour coalition or minority
government starts looking much more likely
given the absence of potential Tory partners.
Labour might also prefer a pact to a coalition, fearing that having to square Clegg, Cable and Huhne (and perhaps others) to get their acquiescence in every Cabinet decision, as well as having to
give them major departments of state, might make firm and decisive
government, in the middle of a major economic and fiscal crisis, virtually impossible.
I can
give you plenty of examples where the last
Labour government did not spend money well and, as someone who believes that spending on health and education can change lives, it is incumbent on me to make sure that every pound is well spent.
If you want to make common cuase with
Labour's social liberasl, as I hope you will, then I think you need to be more willing to
give your own party — and the Coalition
government — some stick.
1) A Ministry of
Labour should be established: to
give working people a voice in
government to counteract the voice of powerful corporate interests.
[4] He served on the front bench but was not invited by Winston Churchill to join the Coalition
government in 1940; as one of the most senior
Labour figures not in office, the responsibilities of running the party were
given to him.
I wasn't at those hospitalities but suspect assurances about
Labour government regulation of financial markets were
given.
And influential think - tanks such as the Resolution Foundation and the Social Market Foundation are now
giving credence to the idea that the Liberal Democrats and the
Labour Party may have more credible post-2015 deficit reduction strategies than a majority Conservative
government.
In March 2009, while Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, Miliband attended the UK premiere of climate change film The Age of Stupid, where he was ambushed by actor Pete Postlethwaite, who threatened to return his OBE and vote for any party other than
Labour if the Kingsnorth coal - fired power station were to be
given the go - ahead by the
government.
He was reputed to favour a Lib - Lab deal and,
given his SDP background, was a member of
Labour's negotiation team that attempted to form a
government with the Liberal Democrats.
It is thought that as many as 100
Labour MPs could now back the
Government's plans to bomb Isil targets in Syria - enough to
give David Cameron a comfortable majority.
Let
Labour give the people of the country a
government that really is of the people and for the people.»
We also know that you and other forecasters
give Labour a near zero chance of forming a majority
government — in reality, without the backing of the SNP.
During his summing - up speech in Thursday's debate, deputy prime minister Nick Clegg was asked by
Labour MP Andrew Gwynne to condemn the behaviour of No 10 officials who were reported as having said that Miliband was «
giving succour» to the Assad regime by refusing to back the
government over its plan for military action.
Tory chairman Grant Shapps said
Labour's proposal to
give a tax rebate to companies paying the living wage would lead to greater costs for
government and taxpayers.
Later this morning Corbyn
gave a speech in Dagenham where he unveiled wide - ranging policy that will form the basis of a
Labour manifesto for
government under his leadership, including # 500bn of public spending.
Given this current deflation of
government support
Labour are doing very poorly currently.
Under this scenario the Lib Dems would effectively drop down to a «confidence and supply» arrangement, leaving
government after the 2014 Budget and
giving them enough time to position themselves midway between the Tories and
Labour.
Keynes offered the Attlee
Government a macro-economic framework for post-war recovery; Hayek's «market society» offered Mrs Thatcher's Tories a roadmap away from post-war social democratic serfdom; Giddens's «Third Way» socio - philosophy allowed «New»
Labour to synthesise or transcend the old dogmas of state - centric social democracy and neo-liberalism»; and Phillip Blond
gave a critique of the market and the state in order for Cameron to claim «society» and its renewal as the key priority of modern Conservatism.
Moreover, the «real» living wage espoused by
Labour can also rise if the
government cuts the help it
gives working families, for example through tax credits.
To get a
Labour majority
government,
given the political weight of liberalised conservatism in southern England, you need the English north, the industrial Midlands, most of Wales and most of Scotland.
Michael Gove is facing demands from
Labour to explain whether the
government has abandoned a Conservative general election manifesto pledge to
give MPs a free vote on whether to overturn the foxhunting ban.
Having ended 18 years of Tory rule,
Labour supporters will
give the
government a period of grace.
I am sure there are some
Labour politicians who are sound on civil liberties, as there are also in the other parties, but
given the record of
Labour in
government and the record of Tories in opposition (oh, how they cared back then) the evidence is emphatic: the state can not be trusted, and the politicians are either incapable or unwilling to control or restrain the state machinery.
If this is not possible, then a
Labour - led coalition with the Liberals would be preferable to a Tory
government or a Tory - Lib coalition — for the same reason that this
gives the working class a slightly better relationship of forces within which to resist the assault on its living standards which will be unleashed by any
government arising from the current election.
But the bill's opponents, including
Labour backbencher John McDonnell, said he was concerned the high court would always
give in to the
government.
You allude to the apparent paradox of class / nationalism when you say «To get a
Labour majority
government,
given the political weight of liberalised conservatism in southern England, you need the English north, the industrial Midlands, most of Wales and most of Scotland».
It congratulated him on
giving a new direction to the
Labour party and making it clear that his
government would be radically different from those of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.
In the past week, we have
given a voice to the growing opposition to the
government's bombing plans — across the country, in parliament and the
Labour party.
Given Next Left's own analysis of - for instance - tackling Poverty and inequality (and bearing in mind the LibDems current offer is regressive), what advantages would their have been to a lib / lab
Government over the last decade, as compared to a solely
Labour one?
Voters were
given no reason to believe that an Ed Miliband
Labour government would have done any better.