Sentences with phrase «labour needs more»

His letter to members adds: «It is certainly our belief that Labour needs more trade unionists in parliament, as opposed to seats being handed out on a grace - and - favour basis to Oxbridge - educated «special advisers», but we make no apology for that.

«It is certainly our belief that Labour needs more trade unionists in Parliament, as opposed to seats being handed out on a grace - and - favour basis to Oxbridge - educated «special advisers», but we make no apology for that.»

To present a fresh face and new policies to the electorate, New Labour needed more than fresh leaders; it had to jettison outdated policies, argued the modernisers.

Not exact matches

Rather, he argues, Ottawa needs to pursue a more multi-faceted policy that focuses on the parts sector and the tool - makers, promotes labour - force development and assists Canadian auto parts suppliers to promote themselves internationally.

Of course, past some threshold, when labour is more productive, employers may decide they need less of it.

The economic implications will be profound with more competitive international labour markets and the need to adopt technologies and policies to encourage people to work longer.

Canada needs to do much more to learn the effects unpaid internships have on the youth labour market.

Current and recent buyers need to devote many more weeks of labour time to the financing of their home than their predecessors.

«The sooner there is some level of certainty over the availability of skilled labour needed by the housebuilding sector, the sooner more investment can be committed to building new homes,» comments Justin Gaze, Joint Head of Residential Development.

The Canadian Labour Congress is hosting town hall meetings in more than 25 communities across the country to address the need for a universal prescription drug plan that covers all Canadians, regardless of their age, income, or where they work or live.

It is crucial that you know that there is a high level of administrative work involved in the industry, such as the processing of investment activities that need more labour input than capital input.

I want to be clear about what I mean by this, because many people believe this issue relates to current skilled labour shortages; some think it applies to our need to attract more professionals such as doctors, engineers and scientists; while others focus on the glass ceiling that many existing immigrants and visible minorities experience.

I clearly need to listen more to my wife, who thought that Brexit would happen, that Trump would win and that the UK media was materially underestimating Labour's support among British voters.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said: «I think what we need in this country is something more robust like a War Powers Act so that governments do get held to account by Parliament for what they do in our name.»

There is no need for us to labour this point, since the parable speaks far more effectively for itself than any modern author could speak for it.

Others have made a move to fewer packaging SKUs, using more one - size - fits - all materials (however much as needed) so that packaging decisions can be made faster and easier by untrained labour forces.

The researchers concluded that date fruit consumption «in the last 4 weeks before labour significantly reduced the need for induction and augmentation of labour, and produced a more favourable, but non-significant, delivery outcome.

Economically speaking, the selling price of organic rice in the Ebro Delta is higher than conventional rice, and permits greater profit to farmers, in spite of the major cost of labour (organic farming of this particular system needs 25 percent more than conventional farming) and lower yields -LRB--15 percent in organic paddy fields).

, have the best chance of avoiding an epidural and / or a c - section, and be given much more time to labour - time, as it turned out, that I didn't need.

She will suggest coping skills and reading materials for you to find out more about what you need to know in labour and birth.

A Cochrane review found that: «Women who used epidurals were more likely to have a longer delivery (second stage of labour), needed their labour contractions stimulated with oxytocin, experienced very low blood pressure, were unable to move for a period of time after the birth (motor blockage), had problems passing urine (fluid retention) and suffered fever and association between epidural analgesia and instrumental birth.»

What does need to be considered is the much more serious impact on the environment of cotton nappies (25 % of all pesticides are used on cotton and the use of child labour plus draining of the Aral sea for Uzbekistan's cotton industry is terrible scandal) compared with bamboo or hemp, which I really didn't know about when I bought mine.

More research is needed into the effects of castor oil to induce labour.

Equally important is the need to change attitudes to birth so that women are encouraged to play a more active part in the birth of their babies instead of being subjected to clinical interventions designed to mitigate the adverse effects of labouring in a starkly unnatural environment.

The book concludes by introducing a new birth chair designed around women's need for physical support in the hospital delivery room, during labour as well as for the birth, a design that will encourage women to adopt a more positive upright attitude to bringing their babies into the world.

They already have some but if they are going to take Labour on in the North, they need more of them.

But McDonnell is proving to be more multi-layered than his caricature, seeking late in his career to match expediency with belief, gripped by the need to prove economic competence (he reads the findings of focus groups as avidly as New Labour's leading figures used to do), knows the importance of narrative and how George Osborne impressively framed one about how Labour crashed the car and should never be given the keys again.

More importantly, a CLP needs to DO it (i.e. have a closed primary open to declared Labour supporters.)

The reason for this is that there are many more liberal parties in the UK Parliament than Conservative, and chances are that during motions that have to carry in parliament that need a majority conservatives will have a hard time passing laws if the Liberal Democrats, Green Party, SNP and Labour all vote against the Tories» motions.

The right - wing media is constantly trying to depict the current system as favouring Labour because the electoral arithmetic implies that the Tories need about 4 % more votes to gain a parliamentary majority than does Labour.

Labour's shadow minister without portfolio Jon Ashworth said: «We had warm words from the Prime Minister yesterday on the need for her Government to stand up for more than just a privileged few.

It really does need to have some socialism in it's blood the name labour is now seen more Tory then Laboulabour is now seen more Tory then LabourLabour red.

What Labour needs is a new social democratic revisionism, that heavily focuses on restructuring the welfare state, to unite communitarian and cosmopolitan voters, in an era of globalization, high inequalities, increased demands for choice, and an ageing population This requires applying the principles of solidarity, reciprocity and individual empowerment, in relation to reforming the welfare state, to make it more effective at tackling poverty and providing economic security, and to satisfy rising demands for choice.

But Labour, it turns out, did not need to spell out any more on its Brexit policy.

It needs more funding and if that comes from Unions or Non Doms... Labour has in the years shown us membership is not a priority but ensuring Unions funding is and the hot potato is that if the Tories win the next election and the argument is about funding the Tories may hit back and state union funding is illegal.

There's no need for a re-calibrated Labour Party when the Scottish nationalists have socialism covered (or, more accurately, when the belief that they do endures).

Therefore New Labour needs to talk less about clever theoretical things such as policy (because women have very small brains) and appeal rather more to their hearts (because women, though dumb as toast, do have very large hearts).

However, Blunkett said that Labour needed to spend more time focusing on its own problems before thinking about the next election:

«Jeremy is owed a debt of gratitude for helping Labour to rediscover its radical routes, but we do need a new generation of Labour men and women to take this party forward, to get us ready for government once more.

Labour needs to de-bureaucratize the welfare state, in order to secure more English votes.

But more than that, Labour supporters need to take that cause back into their own party.

If you want to make common cuase with Labour's social liberasl, as I hope you will, then I think you need to be more willing to give your own party — and the Coalition government — some stick.

Few seem to genuinely question the fact that such a coalition was both arithmetically difficult and lacked a significant degree of political will on the part of the Labour Party; nor does anyone seem to genuinely believe that a Tory minority administration would be either more progressive or provide the country with the stability it needs at a fragile time.

A serving Labour minister with a future stands up and says managerialism and triangulation are bad, New Labour is basically over, that Labour needs to be a movement again — gives tentative respect to the Iraq war marches, and says more public service reform and tax credits won't solve the challenges of a liveable decent society.

Ruth Kelly, who has remained silent on Labour politics since she quit as transport secretary during the party conference, agrees about the need for a more subtle approach.

It won't make Labour any more popular among the voters it needs to save its marginal seats at the election.»

If a Labour politician can't take people criticising how little they are «shifting» while saying we, the people, need more a voice then they're a hypocrite, simple as that.

He argues that to win the next election, Ed Miliband needs to make clear to his supporters that there will be no return to the days of lavish spending, or fight an election knowing that most voters do not believe Labour have learned their lessons, and that many of his potential voters fear Labour would once again borrow and spend more than the country can afford.

He's saying that Labour needs to be seen as more than this if it's going to re-engage ordinary working people.

While Mr Miliband stressed that the current Labour leader was «criss - crossing the country» throwing his weight behind the Remain campaign, he conceeded that «we all need to do more» and that the June 23 referendum is «even more important than the General Election».