Sentences with phrase «lack of proof does»

niknak Lack of proof does not make anything false, it just makes a thing mere speculation, that's all.

The lack of proof does not make something not exist.

Not exact matches

Critics point to her lack of a trip to Wisconsin following the party conventions as proof that she did not take the idea of potentially losing those crucial states seriously, but Clinton said that idea is without merit, saying «we didn't ignore those states.»

-- No response from customer service — Lack of proof of earnings — Brokers are not licensed — Company website does not provide pertinent information

And as there is a dramatic lack of proof that God exists I can not prove to you that he does.

Then pretending that those who lack their belief also have a faith based position demand much less intellectual discipline is a much easier option than facing up to the burden of proof they give when insisting they believe what they do.

But lack of proof that nobody comes back from anything does not necessarily validate your «reality».

I happen to agree that there is a complete lack of proof that there is a god, but what the hell do I know?

Complete lack of proof that something exists is evidence that it does not exist.

Lack of «proof» does not automatically make something totally invisible, as in not there, never was.

An agnostic does not believe in a creator because there is no proof, but they also do not completely dismiss the idea of creation due to the same lack of evidence in denial.

Arkes does much to demonstrate that the Founders had an understanding of that discourse which we ourselves generally lack; Prof. Smolin, in aiming to disagree with Arkes, inadvertently provides his own proof.

The fact that you don't know this is further proof of your lack of knowledge.

You said, «The lack of proof that God exist is not proof he doesn't.»

There are only so many ways you can try to explain that a lack of disproof does not equal proof, nor even evidence.

Seems to me we have a double standard here — you asked for proof that god does not exist, and we (multiple people) accommodated you within the bounds of logic and evidence (lack thereof), but you have not (can not!)

@ Moby, If you don't believe in angels based on the evidence or the lack thereof that's fine, but if you're claiming that the nonexistence of angels to be the absolute truth then you better provide the proof.

The lack of proof for the nonexistence of a god does not prove a god exists, any more than a lack of proof for the nonexistence of a planet somewhere in the universe made entirely of chocolate pudding proves that such a planet exists.

I don't bother with many other comment sections on the internet, so if she wants to explain to me how a complete lack of proof led her in one of the worst possible directions or how her lack of understanding of morals and ethics lead her to choose the most criminal of religious cults to join..., then that would be great and I'm sure we could all enjoy picking apart her arguments for her «conversion» to those of us who know the difference between reason, logic, common sense, and ethics and morals and empathy and sympathy... as I would guess she doesn't give a crap anyway I doubt she'll show up here.

That's pretty easy to do, considering your lack of proof that you're right.

Given current lack of evidence for proof of anything supernatural, will there be leniency for those who simply and honestly claim, «I don't know», granted there is a supernatural, and that the Christian God is the true God who did present us with an ultimatum to accept him or not, expecting us to wage the eternal fate of our soul?

to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.

A lack of fact in proving the existence of a god and a lack of fact proving that there is no omnipotent being who does not want to be made known but would rather have us develop faith in said omnipotent being, but since there are those who say well since there is no proof that such a being exists then I will conclude that no such being exists even though there is no proof established to verify that claim either.

It is because many of the terms lack meaning that squares with verifiable human experience (must be verifiable to others, as well, for purposes of proof; but inverse this requirement, as I did with language, and you end up with the following: if something can't be evidenced to others, there is a good likelihood that it is not what the individual thinks it is).

We don't have to prove it because our book says that even if we did prove it you wouldn't believe — so it's all your fault that you don't accept our lack of proof.

@YeahOK: Does the lack of proof mean that something is necessarily a myth?

you'd think if god was truly the god spoken of then faith would be unneeded and belief a thing of the past — yet — people will believe whatever they wish no matter the proof or lack there of and its truly sad to consider that this delusion type mass brainwashing is going on right now and has been for over 2000 years... please don't let the time in which this sm.ut has been around make you think its worth its wieght in salt — i bid Lot's wife its not — in ALL early man stories from around the globe people have created GRAND stories about the start and end of times — its that simple.

Me: To be sure I understand, you are telling me that any sickness, injury, disability, or other bodily imperfection offends God; that God desires to instantly, by the Holy Spirit, heal us of every infirmity and does so; and that any bodily imperfection is positive proof of a total lack of faith?

Ya, well I've taken to searching google (since you evidently can't, or don't want to due to a lack of proof).

We may even ask whether this lack of demonstration and proof does belong to the cross itself — whether skandalon is in fact the cross itself, not the form in which it is proclaimed.

No he did not based on the lack of historical and theological proof e.g. «Thou art Peter» (Matt 16: 18 - 19) passage only appears in one gospel and therefore its lacks any attestation verification.

Like FAITH and PREDICTING and playing make - believe... There is lack of proof, therefor it does not exist!

Using the known laws of physics I can't prove that naturally the pen on the floor moved to top of my desk, but although I lack proof I can reasonable belief that someone or thing did move it from the floor up to the desk.

Of course, I might be holding back out of fear of being invited by Christine O'Donnell to a satanic witchy picnic on a blood - stained altar (said bloodstain most likely caused by a diabetic performing some dark and devilish ceremonial pricking of their finger to check their glucose levels, which obviously is demonic in nature and proof of why the healthcare reform act should be done away with so they can let such practitioners of such technological dark arts die due to lack of insuliOf course, I might be holding back out of fear of being invited by Christine O'Donnell to a satanic witchy picnic on a blood - stained altar (said bloodstain most likely caused by a diabetic performing some dark and devilish ceremonial pricking of their finger to check their glucose levels, which obviously is demonic in nature and proof of why the healthcare reform act should be done away with so they can let such practitioners of such technological dark arts die due to lack of insuliof fear of being invited by Christine O'Donnell to a satanic witchy picnic on a blood - stained altar (said bloodstain most likely caused by a diabetic performing some dark and devilish ceremonial pricking of their finger to check their glucose levels, which obviously is demonic in nature and proof of why the healthcare reform act should be done away with so they can let such practitioners of such technological dark arts die due to lack of insuliof being invited by Christine O'Donnell to a satanic witchy picnic on a blood - stained altar (said bloodstain most likely caused by a diabetic performing some dark and devilish ceremonial pricking of their finger to check their glucose levels, which obviously is demonic in nature and proof of why the healthcare reform act should be done away with so they can let such practitioners of such technological dark arts die due to lack of insuliof their finger to check their glucose levels, which obviously is demonic in nature and proof of why the healthcare reform act should be done away with so they can let such practitioners of such technological dark arts die due to lack of insuliof why the healthcare reform act should be done away with so they can let such practitioners of such technological dark arts die due to lack of insuliof such technological dark arts die due to lack of insuliof insulin)

Many parents who really don't understand the hazards that lack of baby proofing can pose tend to frown upon those babyproofing checklists online and in parenting magazines.

The lack of women applicants provides proof that women don't apply [subtext: Women CHOOSE not to apply].

That doesn't constitute proof of lack of impact, merely lack of any evidence of impact that can be measured by them (and the implication was that, due to slow speed of Wikileaks releases and lack of any dramatic info in the emails; any impact is pretty much impossible to measure).

Based on lack of prosecution, I don't think anything is known to be provably illegal (not a conclusive proof, admittedly, but a good indicator.

«Well, we have no burden of proof and we think the fact they didn't call key people in this case is a reflection of the lack of evidence in this case which is.

But he says the jury did not seem to be deterred by lack of proof of an actual quid pro quo, through an email, for instance.

Although the documents were highly suggestive (as was the lack of waivers for a number of individuals who probably should have gotten them) on their own, they did not constitute proof that NIH had been overlooking conflicts of interest.

With direct proof of serotonin deficiency in any mental disorder lacking, the claimed efficacy of SSRIs is often cited as indirect support for the serotonin hypothesis... The fact that aspirin cures headaches does not prove that headaches are due to low levels of aspirin in the brain.

Critic - proof, though, much in the same way that the Transformers films» lack of critical raves didn't dissuade the legion of fans of the toys or loud explosions from flocking to the local theaterplex in droves.

Jake Gyllenhaal (Proof, The Day After Tomorrow) is terrific as Swofford, showing an amiable and intelligent persona that makes his character always appealing and interesting, while also looking like a man just on the verge of cracking from the constant pressures of uncertainty and lack of personal meaning in everything he does.

Willingham and others acknowledge that lack of evidence doesn't constitute definitive proof of nonexistence.

The lack of reviews doesn't help the book's overall rank or provide social proof to help sell the book.

It's large size may turn a few off, and a lack of 4G LTE connectivity doesn't provide a future - proof device, but if those factors aren't an issue you can't go wrong with the Droid X2.

The lack of support for Ultra HD Blu - rays does mean that PlayStation owners aren't future - proofed in terms of a content viewing experience.

HELEN FRANKENTHALER (B. 1928) What Red Lines Can Do (Harrison 22 - 26) the complete set of five signed and dated screenprints in colors, 1970, on Arches handmade, each numbered 45/75 (there were also 24 artist's proofs), published by Multiples, Inc., New York, the full sheets, occasional minute foxmarks, pale time staining, otherwise in good condition, each framed, lacking the original Plexiglas box, title page and justification Each S. 38 1/2 x 26 1/8 in.

Lacking any definitive proof, the «army of experts» demands compliance with their prescriptions for the world because AGW is possibly correct and therefore we are doomed if we don't act now.