Sentences with phrase «land agreement provisions»

Land agreement provisions likely to breach Ch 1 prohibition Restrictions in leases may not be compatible with Ch 1, particularly covenants limiting:

Not exact matches

Corporate raider Carl Icahn has reached an agreement with the management of CVR Energy under which the company will drop its poison pill provision, clearing the way for a potential $ 2.26 billion bid for the Sugar Land, Texas — based oil refiner.

Larry has worked with First Nations on lands and resources issues for more than 25 years, and has developed extensive experience in the negotiation of impacts and benefits agreements, environmental assessment, co-management measures and treaty provisions.

It has been suggested to me, at a couple of levels of hearsay, that that «the US government had to implement a provision to require the financial institutions to accept electronic signatures on agreements of purchase and sale [of land] for the purposes of financing.»

Our lawyers also work with clients to draft and negotiate contractual provisions addressing environmental indemnity and other critical environmental issues in connection with land sales and financing agreements.

Frances's day - to - day work involves drafting and negotiating option agreements, conditional sale agreements, multi-conditional development agreements, overage provisions, collaboration and joint venture agreements, land assembly, asset management, acquisitions, disposals and leases and dealing with and resolving, complex title issues.

(4) An agreement under subsection (3) may be registered against the land to which it applies and the City may enforce its provisions against the owner and, subject to the Registry Act and the Land Titles Act, any and all subsequent owners of the lland to which it applies and the City may enforce its provisions against the owner and, subject to the Registry Act and the Land Titles Act, any and all subsequent owners of the lLand Titles Act, any and all subsequent owners of the landland.

(14) Any agreement entered into under clause (11)(c) or (d) may be registered against the land to which it applies and the City is entitled to enforce the provisions thereof against the owner and, subject to the provisions of the Registry Act and the Land Titles Act, any and all subsequent owners of the lland to which it applies and the City is entitled to enforce the provisions thereof against the owner and, subject to the provisions of the Registry Act and the Land Titles Act, any and all subsequent owners of the lLand Titles Act, any and all subsequent owners of the landland.

Very soon after the ratification of the first comprehensive land claim, The James Bay and Northern Quebec Settlement Agreement (JBNQA), Canada and Quebec set about ignoring the Agreement and defying its provisions.

What is specific about these claims is that they allege non-fulfillment of a particular provision in an earlier treaty, though, generically, a modern land claim agreement could also give rise to a specific claim.

Even the clear provisions of the Indian Act dealing with federal management of surrendered Aboriginal reserve lands can not operate unless there is a federal - provincial agreement in place concerning the status of the surrendered lands.

Another mechanism provided within the NTA is the Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) provisions, particularly those in relation to area agreements.50 Of particular relevance is section 24CB (c) that provides for ILUAs about «the relationship between native title rights and interests and other rights and interests in relation to the area»51 This section envisages native title as part of a range of interests that exist within a region.

Currently, these provisions allow for consultation with native title parties on the protection of native title rights and interests and the signing of an access agreement with registered native title parties before entry onto the land can occur.

The Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) provisions of the NTA provide additional protection to the rights and obligations agreed as a result of these negotiations.

The existing Indigenous Land Use Agreements (ILUA) provisions would remain as an option for future acts otherwise covered by the new process.

Future Act agreements between native title claimants and mining / exploration companies occur in South Australia and generally include provisions for heritage, land access, low impact exploration procedures, protection of Aboriginal sites and employment and training opportunities.

However, it is a right which exists in an Act which makes provision for the future dealings in land and where, if agreement is not reached about the doing of a particular future act, the Tribunal is mandated to take into account not only the impact of a proposed future act on claimants» native title, way of life, culture and traditions and social, cultural and economic structures etc (s 39 (1)(a)(i)- (v)-RRB- but also the economic significance and any public interest in the doing of the future act (s 39 (1)(c) and (e)-RRB-.

Further, that the process for certification of Indigenous Land Use Agreements (ILUA) in the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) be used as a model for developing replacement provisions to ensure the informed consent of traditional owners.

It also acknowledges the provisions introduced by the 1998 amendments to the Native Title Act regarding Indigenous Land Use Agreements, as well as the creation of the Indigenous Land Fund in 1995 to purchase land for indigenous Australians unable to benefit from recognition of native tiLand Use Agreements, as well as the creation of the Indigenous Land Fund in 1995 to purchase land for indigenous Australians unable to benefit from recognition of native tiLand Fund in 1995 to purchase land for indigenous Australians unable to benefit from recognition of native tiland for indigenous Australians unable to benefit from recognition of native title.

While the CERD acknowledged that the provisions introduced by the 1998 amendments to the Native Title Act regarding Indigenous Land Use Agreements, as well as the creation of the Indigenous Land Fund in 1995 to purchase land for Indigenous Australians unable to benefit from recognition of native title, the Commission also notes that the intended response to the Mabo decision by the Australian Government in 1992 has not yet been implemented in its entirLand Use Agreements, as well as the creation of the Indigenous Land Fund in 1995 to purchase land for Indigenous Australians unable to benefit from recognition of native title, the Commission also notes that the intended response to the Mabo decision by the Australian Government in 1992 has not yet been implemented in its entirLand Fund in 1995 to purchase land for Indigenous Australians unable to benefit from recognition of native title, the Commission also notes that the intended response to the Mabo decision by the Australian Government in 1992 has not yet been implemented in its entirland for Indigenous Australians unable to benefit from recognition of native title, the Commission also notes that the intended response to the Mabo decision by the Australian Government in 1992 has not yet been implemented in its entirety.

In certain cases, the subdivision agreements drafted by municipalities have provisions requiring the developer to turn over the buffer land to the municipality after their share of the recovery fee has been paid.

So while you need to do your due diligence when buying any developable land, the builder needs to recover their cost of putting in services and the municipalities need to ensure provisions in the subdivision agreements to avoid these situations.