Law firm libraries do not just carry out legal research, but can be heavily involved in industry and client research.
Not exact matches
It seems to me that, in calling out what is wrong with
law firm libraries, there needs to be some discussion of what can therefore be
done to correct things.
On the other side of that, I currently work in a
law firm library, and we just don't have the space or budget to include «just in case» materials.
Given that
law libraries, whether academic, courthouse or private
law firm, are constantly under space pressures,
does this mean that we should be discarding the other 80 - 94 % of the collection and using the space for something else?
What
does all of this mean for my
law firm library budget?
But most of these were smaller
libraries in
law firms and courthouses: most Canadian academic
law libraries never
did adopt KF Modified, and some of those who
did have recently given it up, reverting to unmodified Library of Congress Classification, using KE for their Canadian
law holdings.
So how
does this relate to the
law firm library of the future?
I have been interested to learn a bit lately about why
law firms evolved as they
did, noting the degree to which joint ownership of
libraries, including case
law and subscriptions, may have been a factor.
The challenge a number of
law firm library managers face when drawing up strategy is when the
firms themselves (the partnership or the staff management company)
do not have overall strategies including things like a stated vision or objectives.
I'm not sure what the best solution is for the org structure of a
law library within the broader firm... However it appears that Steve Matthews of the Vancouver Law Librarian Blog do
law library within the broader
firm... However it appears that Steve Matthews of the Vancouver
Law Librarian Blog do
Law Librarian Blog
does!
In the late 1980's and early 90's, the local union list of titles held by local
law firm libraries was a lifeline to librarians, and ILL didn't just help us share resources and keep costs down.
For example, how
does a
library contribute to the
law firm's revenues?
How
does the
library improve the quality of the service provided to the
law firm's clients?
However discovery tools
do not appear to be a practical solution for
law firm libraries.
Looking at this message to both lawyers and librarians, is there work that is being
done by lawyers in the
law firms that
library can help to automate or otherwise achieve?
Despite the fact that many large
firms have
libraries (and this is indeed a small number of
firms), and despite the efforts of the
law librarians,, most lawyers
do not appear to put much stock in legal research.
Close to half of the
libraries in the sample have decreased the size of the
library within the past five years, and more than half of the
law firm libraries have
done so.
Increasingly, we are seeing
law firm librarians and
library staff becoming more involved in KM at their
firms (e.g., helping the
firm organize and maintain the
firm's research memo and work product databases or helping design and maintain the
firm's intranet, to name but two examples) but we don't necessarily see the opposite: it remains unusual for KM lawyers and KM staff to be involved with or integrated into
library or research services.
I read today's post by Sarah Sutherland in the On
Firmer Ground blog, «The developing skill - employment disconnect in
law libraries and what to
do with it» with interest.
«While two - to - an - office has been in place at some
firms for some time, in - boarding, which is already
done at many other professional
firms, can make a
law firm even more efficient as the need for storage rooms and
libraries disappears.»
Ours were recycled from a Savannah
law firm doing away with its
law library.