Sentences with phrase «legal definitions defines»

Share Pin Belgium) about romance and relationships, and you can read all about my adventures elsewhere US Legal Definitions defines dating as frequent, intimate associations primarily characterized by the expectation of affectional involvement.

Not exact matches

In response to an amendment to this Bill seeking to clarify the legal status of the human embryo, a former Lord Chancellor stated, «An embryo is not a chattelA human entity which is living is not a chattel and neither is it a person in any ordinary senseIt is wrong to try and define a human embryo in terms of established legal definitions which are plainly inapplicable to human embryos.

In states that do have a legal definition it is usually defined as whether a «reasonable person» would think that an official has what appears to be a conflict of interest and therefore has a responsibility to take action to eliminate that appearance.

The definition of spouse includes a legal partner as defined by state law.

Educate them if they're new, actually ask them what their practices are (I find a lot of people automatically label people as a BYB just for having the gall to breed any dog at all, it doesn't matter what the persons standards were — BYB is just a negative slang term intended to attack / offend any given breeder — it actually doesn't mean anything in a legal sense, there is no legal definition of it because there is no way of defining it in a legal manner without also applying it to all breeders).

They have put out a call for a vendor to help them build a legal thesaurus and turn that mess of a definition you see above into a list of likely synonyms, along with something that indicates the strength of the correlation between the term being defined and its possibly synonyms.

California Penal Code 245.6 defines «hazing» as a crime in California and sets forth the legal definition as follows:

While Legal Times makes editorial sense as a «well defined product for an audience of narrowly defined shared interests,» he argues, the NLJ is a newspaper in search of definition.

Across the provinces, the governing regulation tends to focus on defining «legal advice,» «legal services,» or «practice of law» without providing an accompanying definition for «legal information» as a point of contrast.

This legal provision sends the reader to the pre-existing definition in Art. 1 (2) of the Technical Standards Directive as amended by Art. 1 (2) of the Technical Standards (Amendment) Directive, which defines an information society service as «(1) any service normally provided for remuneration, (2) at a distance, by electronic means and (3) at the individual request of a recipient of services.»

The Society's definition for delivery of legal services is still a work in progress, but Policy 5 approved by Council on Nov. 20 defines it as follows:

While Indigenous definitions of territory are generally more fluid than colonial interpretations — depending on relationships between neighbouring Indigenous nations — Canadian legal frameworks of understanding territory are based on geographical areas that are divided and defined by major political units, such as provinces and cities.

In doing so, Justice Hinkson specifically mentioned the definition of a «legal principle», which was previously defined by the SCC in R v. Malmo - Levine, 2003 SCC 74 as one within the sphere of the judiciary and not public policy.

Obiter J: The always sensible legal blogger joins cause with the Special Advocates» response and also makes a number of interesting further points, for example: «The problem is the definition of just what those «narrowly defined circumstances» are.

Learn more about what defines negligence, including the definition of contributory negligence, a legal doctrine in the state of North Carolina, as well as what defines a tort.

Legal terms used within a definition are defined through hyperlinks.

If the word was defined in the legal document you signed on, then it suppresses the dictionary definition.

So, the legal definition of words and phrases should be defined as clear as possible in the law itself (e.g., the definition sections of the MGL noted above).

The language of «principles» as opposed to «policy» or «practice» clearly suggests belief rather than conduct, and the upcoming educational (CPD) requirements, on equality, diversity and «inclusion» (the latter being a term that is undefined in the case law but which has variously been defined by the Working Group (in the report) as «making a better space for everyone» and (on the definitions website) with reference to RBC's corporate policy — which we can celebrate as the first time that a corporation's principles have been incorporated by reference into legal requirements!

In fact, the Italian Republic, before the adoption of Directive 2017/1371 (on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law), was free to provide that in its legal system those rules, like the ones on the definition of offences and the determination of penalties, form part of substantive criminal law, and are thereby subject to the principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law (para. 45).

Because of this, concepts like Replacement Cost do not have to be specifically defined if the insurance company does not want to define it in the actual policy and would rather defer to the definition given to the term by legal precedent.

Life insurance policies are written in legal language that can be confusing, so all policies include a definitions section that defines words used in the policy.

More comprehensive definitions have been attempted by the EBA in 2014 (European Banking Association) and the Banca d'Italia, which both define Bitcoin as «a digital representation of value that is neither issued by a central bank or public authority nor necessarily attached to a fiat currency, but is used by natural or legal persons as a means of exchange and can be transferred, stored or traded electronically».

Child physical abuse has been defined by the World Health Organization as the intentional use of physical force against a child that results or has a high likelihood of resulting in harm for the child's health, survival, development or dignity.2 Legal definitions of physical abuse typically require physical harm to have occurred; governmental definitions of abuse and neglect are not uniform.