Not exact matches
The new amendment will, in effect, restore death - penalty review to the
jurisdiction of the Supreme People's
Court, where
legal scholars say it always properly belonged.
On 6 August 2013, Federal Judge Amos Mazzant
of the Eastern District
of Texas
of the Fifth Circuit ruled that bitcoins are «a currency or a form
of money» (specifically securities as defined by Federal Securities Laws), and as such were subject to the
court's
jurisdiction, [274][274] and Germany's Finance Ministry subsumed bitcoins under the term «unit
of account» — a financial instrument — though not as e-money or a functional currency, a classification nonetheless having
legal and tax implications.
We reserve the right to provide information to law enforcement personnel and other third parties to answer inquiries; to respond to
legal process; to respond to the order
of a
court of competent
jurisdiction and those exercising the
court's authority; and, to protect us and our users.
Lively, with representation by Liberty Counsel (an evangelical
legal organization), responded that in both the U.S. and Uganda he exercised constitutionally protected speech rights; that he opposes violence and neither committed nor plotted any; that Uganda did not in fact pass a proposed draconian anti-gay law, and that in any case Uganda's political institutions, instead
of himself, are responsible for its political decisions; and that the
court lacks
jurisdiction and the plaintiffs lack standing.
If the Supreme
Court somehow obtained
jurisdiction over this independent sovereign power, according to Coons it would not be acting «either as or for the state, but as the arbiter
of legal sovereigns who need a way to live together by some rule more humane than naked power.»
The
courts proved to be useless because Nestle had operations so in many different countries, outside the
jurisdiction of any single
legal system.
Any
legal action or dispute arising out
of, relating to or concerning the Terms
of Use and the Site shall be exclusively brought in the state or federal
court of competent
jurisdiction in the State
of California, USA.
All claims,
legal proceedings or litigation arising in connection with the Services will be brought solely in the English
courts and you consent to the
jurisdiction of and venue in such
courts and waive any objection as to inconvenient forum.
Jurisdiction You expressly understand and agree to submit to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the country, state or territory determined solely by Parenting Ideas to resolve any legal matter arising from the Terms or related to your use of the Parenting Id
Jurisdiction You expressly understand and agree to submit to the personal and exclusive
jurisdiction of the courts of the country, state or territory determined solely by Parenting Ideas to resolve any legal matter arising from the Terms or related to your use of the Parenting Id
jurisdiction of the
courts of the country, state or territory determined solely by Parenting Ideas to resolve any
legal matter arising from the Terms or related to your use
of the Parenting Ideas website.
This is according to a member
of his
legal team, Chris Ackumey, who told Citi News, there are indications to put Mr. Anyidoho before a magistrate
court today, although the
court is expected to refuse
jurisdiction because
of...
On Tuesday, the case was mentioned in Ibadan Chief Magistrate
Court and although the Chief Magistrate in charge of the case, Mrs. Kehinde Durosaro - Tijani adjourned till March 1, 2016, the police officer investigating the death of Lowo and the involvement of his wife, Amos Adewale, informed the Chief Magistrate Court that based on legal advice from the state, the court lacked the jurisdiction to hear the
Court and although the Chief Magistrate in charge
of the case, Mrs. Kehinde Durosaro - Tijani adjourned till March 1, 2016, the police officer investigating the death
of Lowo and the involvement
of his wife, Amos Adewale, informed the Chief Magistrate
Court that based on legal advice from the state, the court lacked the jurisdiction to hear the
Court that based on
legal advice from the state, the
court lacked the jurisdiction to hear the
court lacked the
jurisdiction to hear the case.
According to the decision by a five - member panel
of justices, there's no real factual and
legal basis for Ghana's Supreme
Court to share its powers and jurisdiction with any other court, and so it can not be compelled to halt the ongoing proceed
Court to share its powers and
jurisdiction with any other
court, and so it can not be compelled to halt the ongoing proceed
court, and so it can not be compelled to halt the ongoing proceedings.
(a) If Goods or Services are primarily being provided in the United States or any other location outside
of Canada, any
legal suit, action or proceeding arising out
of or relating to this Agreement shall be instituted in the federal
courts of the United States
of America or the
courts of the State
of New York in each case located within Erie County, New York, U.S.A. and each Party irrevocably submits to the exclusive
jurisdiction of such
courts in any such suit, action or proceeding.
But the Supreme
Court, in making a determination on a similar application filed by Woyome for stay of proceedings pending the final outcome of the case before the African Court, argued that there was no real factual and legal basis for it to share its powers and jurisdiction with any other court, and so it can not be compelled to halt the ongoing proceed
Court, in making a determination on a similar application filed by Woyome for stay
of proceedings pending the final outcome
of the case before the African
Court, argued that there was no real factual and legal basis for it to share its powers and jurisdiction with any other court, and so it can not be compelled to halt the ongoing proceed
Court, argued that there was no real factual and
legal basis for it to share its powers and
jurisdiction with any other
court, and so it can not be compelled to halt the ongoing proceed
court, and so it can not be compelled to halt the ongoing proceedings.
You agree that
jurisdiction over and venue in any
legal proceeding directly or indirectly arising out
of or relating to this site (including but not limited to the purchase
of Integrative Health Care, P.C. products) shall be in the state or federal
courts located in Maricopa County, Arizona.
You agree that
jurisdiction over and venue in any
legal proceeding directly or indirectly arising out
of or relating to this site (including but not limited to the purchase
of Activation Products products) shall be in the state or federal
courts located in Los Angeles County, California.
(a) Whenever the Attorney General receives a complaint in writing signed by an individual to the effect that he is being deprived
of or threatened with the loss
of his right to the equal protection
of the laws, on account
of his race, color, religion, or national origin, by being denied equal utilization
of any public facility which is owned, operated, or managed by or on behalf
of any State or subdivision thereof, other than a public school or public college as defined in section 401
of title IV hereof, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers
of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate
legal proceedings for relief and that the institution
of an action will materially further the orderly progress
of desegregation in public facilities, the Attorney General is authorized to institute for or in the name
of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district
court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such
court shall have and shall exercise
jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section.
(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by reason
of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers
of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate
legal proceedings for relief and that the institution
of an action will materially further the orderly achievement
of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice
of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name
of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district
court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such
court shall have and shall exercise
jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or
court of the United States to issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation
of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power
of the
court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.
(C) Any person aggrieved may brand a civil action in any
court of competent
jurisdiction for such
legal or equitable relief as will effectuate the purposes
of this Act: Provided.
Once a creditor is armed with a judgment order
of a
court of legal jurisdiction, the creditor can proceed to attach or seize assets
of the debtor, but only under
legal procedures and guidance.
With a judgment from a
legal court of jurisdiction, a creditor can attach liens, seize some assets, and garnish wages when it is
legal to do so.
If a
court of competent
jurisdiction determines that any term or provision
of these Terms and Conditions is invalid, illegal, or incapable
of being enforced, all other terms and provisions
of these Terms and Conditions shall remain in full force and effect so long as the economic or
legal substance
of the transactions contemplated herein is not affected in a manner that is materially adverse to either party to the Terms and Conditions.
You agree that any
legal action or proceeding between Tamarindo Diving Center and you for any purpose concerning this Agreement or the parties» obligations hereunder shall be brought exclusively in a federal or state
court of competent
jurisdiction sitting in Costa Rica.
Any
legal proceeding arising out or relating to this ToU against or relating to Undead Labs or any Related Parties will be subject to the exclusive
jurisdiction of any state or federal
court sitting in Seattle, Washington and you irrevocably consent to the
jurisdiction of such
courts.
12.2 The
courts of England shall have the non-exclusive
jurisdiction to settle any dispute that may arise out
of, under, or in connection with these Terms or the
legal relationship established by them.
At the core
of the case was the
legal principal that tribal
courts have civil
jurisdiction over non-Indian conduct arising from consensual relations on Indian reservations, weaving through overriding sovereignties across territories and bodies, and, critically, Indigenous sovereignty.
While demand response may soon have its proverbial 15 minutes in the national spotlight, some
legal experts believe the Supreme
Court may have picked up the case because it simply wants to weigh on the issue
of state vs. federal
jurisdiction.
However, it is worth noting that arbitration friendly
jurisdictions and
courts in leading
legal systems do restrain the applications
of public policy, reserving same to the flagrant contraventions
of the fundamentals
of the concerned
legal system.
The question
of jurisdiction will now have to be heard in that foreign member state, which may not deal with issues as swiftly as the English
courts and may increase
legal costs by requiring parties to instruct an second set
of legal advisers abroad and in the translation
of court documents and correspondence.
While discussing with a colleague John B. West's 1909 Article Multiplicity
of Reports, he pointed out that John West had a hands on understanding
of how
courts and judges worked in a wide array
of jurisdictions all over the country, and that this understanding informed his efforts to create standards
of legal publishing.
Should the referring
court find that, according to the particular values
of the
legal order
of the Member State in which it has
jurisdiction, offences such as those committed by Mr I. pose a direct threat to the calm and physical security
of the population, that should not necessarily lead to the expulsion
of the person concerned.
The key benefits
of such injunctions were the speed with which the English
courts can decide upon the issue
of jurisdiction and the ability to have the debate over
jurisdiction in English rather than a foreign language without the need to instruct
legal advisers in another country.
The
Court also makes reference to Recital 16 of the Regulation which underlines that the special rules of jurisdiction based on a close connection between the court and the dispute are meant to safeguard legal certainty as to the place of jurisdiction and to avoid that the respondent is exposed to a jurisdictional venue that he or she could not have reasonably fore
Court also makes reference to Recital 16
of the Regulation which underlines that the special rules
of jurisdiction based on a close connection between the
court and the dispute are meant to safeguard legal certainty as to the place of jurisdiction and to avoid that the respondent is exposed to a jurisdictional venue that he or she could not have reasonably fore
court and the dispute are meant to safeguard
legal certainty as to the place
of jurisdiction and to avoid that the respondent is exposed to a jurisdictional venue that he or she could not have reasonably foreseen.
However, I have added to the Case Law page on my
legal research and writing website a chart
of links for accessing Canadian
court dockets (and for those
jurisdictions who do not provide access, I provide a link to contact the
court registry).
Therefore, it seems likely that any such joint
court would be limited to a body
of last appeal for questions pertaining to the withdrawal agreement on citizens» rights within the
jurisdiction of the United Kingdom
legal order.
However, it seems clear that such a radical upheaval
of jurisdiction within the European Union would require the
Court of Justice to relax its current strict position over interpretative superiority in the name
of the autonomy
of the EU
legal order.
Having re-established that the centre
of interests is a possible place
of jurisdiction, without addressing the other potential places
of jurisdiction (namely the domicile
of the defendant and all other Member States where the infringing material was accessible — admittedly, this was not the subject
of the preliminary reference), the
Court addresses the question
of where the centre
of interest
of a
legal person is located.
the
Court has
jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings on the validity
of CFSP acts, provided that it relates either to the monitoring
of the act's compliance with Article 40 TEU, or to reviewing the legality
of restrictive measures against natural or
legal persons.
But a High
Court judge and
Court of Appeal judges concluded they did not have the «
jurisdiction» to make such an order because the girl was not habitually resident in the UK when
legal proceedings were launched.
This collection
of essays examines the shifting
legal landscape
of federal claims by foreign plaintiffs in the federal
courts and focuses on the most common statutes invoked by foreign plaintiffs, as well as the threshold issues
of personal
jurisdiction and pleading standards that govern such suits.
If it is not possible to resolve the disputes ourselves, then we each agree to resolve those disputes or claims between you and Bootstrap
Legal of any nature whatsoever, including but not limited to those relating to use
of the Site or the quality or appropriateness
of services offered by the Bootstrap
Legal, shall be resolved by binding arbitration before Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services («JAMS»), rather than in a
court of general
jurisdiction.
The need to be able to explain the purpose
of transfers into offshore holding structures was further emphasised by the English Supreme
Court in the case
of Prest v Petrodel Resources (which will be influential in the many offshore
jurisdictions whose
legal systems are based on English common law).
The Attorney General
of Canada applied for judicial review at the Federal
Court regarding the tribunal's
jurisdiction to award
legal costs.
Most
legal readers will find the
Court's conundrum familiar: how can courts parlay their analog powers of injunctive relief (censorship) in a digital era where agents and assets skirt effortlessly around jurisdiction and where technology offers an endless bag of tricks to make a mockery of any court's stuffy imprim
Court's conundrum familiar: how can
courts parlay their analog powers
of injunctive relief (censorship) in a digital era where agents and assets skirt effortlessly around
jurisdiction and where technology offers an endless bag
of tricks to make a mockery
of any
court's stuffy imprim
court's stuffy imprimatur?
«Where a
legal situation does not come within the scope
of EU law, the
Court does not have
jurisdiction to rule on it and any provisions
of the Charter relied upon can not,
of themselves, form the basis for such
jurisdiction» (para. 20)
Recently, in Sattva Capital Corporation v Creston Moly Corporation et al [2014] 2 SCR 633, the
court confirmed that the appellate
jurisdiction to review written construction cases must necessarily be limited given the
legal requirement for the first instance
court to reach its decision as a mixed question
of law and fact.
The term
of legal autonomy comprises thus for Gragl four «imperatives» that the
Court has developed, with the consequence
of some serious constraints imposed by the CJEU under its vigilant protection
of legal autonomy on Member States choice and utilization
of other international
courts and tribunals and on the
jurisdiction of such
courts and tribunals (p. 84).
For the purposes
of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), the
jurisdiction of the
Court is limited in the Treaties to whether Art. 40 TEU has been respected and to the review
of legality
of certain decisions taken based on Art. 275 (2) TFEU, the latter concerning essentially
legal actions brought against the legality
of decisions on restrictive measures against natural and
legal persons taken by the Council.
Self - help representation is an area where the work
of legal aid administrations may, in some
jurisdictions, say California, blends into responsibilities assumed by the
courts themselves.
Russia maintains that there is no factual or
legal basis for the ICJ to adjudicate, claiming that the issues between Ukraine and Russia relate to the legality
of the use
of force, sovereignty, territorial integrity and self - determination and therefore go beyond the
jurisdiction of the
Court.