Please see the full
Legal Notice here.
Not exact matches
You're overlooking (not really, I know) that you're talking to too many practitioners,
here, who've learned, too well, from their Court of Appeal (and the SCC, too often) that it's not really a problem if nobody
notices the absence of
legal basis.
Here you can find resources such as a checklist for preparing for a Rule 26 meeting and a guide to preparing a
legal hold
notice, as well as sample forms for
legal holds.
I wrote
here in August about the planned launch of JD Supra, a new
legal site with the premise, «Give content, get
noticed.»
We've
noticed the phenomenon
here at
Legal Blog Watch, and so has legal blogger David Giacalone, who took time out from writing an important piece on legal ethics to dig deeper into the Savage phenom
Legal Blog Watch, and so has
legal blogger David Giacalone, who took time out from writing an important piece on legal ethics to dig deeper into the Savage phenom
legal blogger David Giacalone, who took time out from writing an important piece on
legal ethics to dig deeper into the Savage phenom
legal ethics to dig deeper into the Savage phenomenon.
As you may have
noticed from my last few short posts
here, I've been doing more writing over on Justia's
Legal Marketing & Technology Blog this year than in years past and as such I proposed the idea of live blogging sessions at Google I / O this year.
In the brief excerpt cited I
noticed —
here comes the
legal reference — the use of «reversion»:
Here in Alberta, on November 12, 2013 there was a
Notice to the Profession from the Court of Queen's Bench adopting the 7th edition of the Canadian Guide to Uniform
Legal Citation (Toronto: Carswell, 2010).
It is certainly true, as we
here at Abnormal Use have been cited by a number of
legal publications that have taken
notice of this site, including The New York Times, NPR, Scientific American, and a whole host of regional newspapers, law blogs, and other publications.