Not exact matches
A spokesman for the Assembly Democrats has said that technically, the
legislature has until the end of 2016
to come to agreement on the pension forfeiture measure.
«It relies
on too many unrealistic savings, it contains immense cuts
to higher education, and it would violate existing state contracts with our employees, resulting in costly legal battles for years
to come,» said Malloy, «if the responsible solution I negotiated with Democrats isn't going
to pass, then it is incumbent
on the
legislature to reach a new
agreement soon — one that is realistic and, ideally, bipartisan.»
In fact, the appeals court deadline
came and went, with no
agreement between the governor and the
legislature on how
to proceed.
After years of advocacy efforts around the funding formula and some pragmatic compromise this summer, both parties in the Illinois
legislature and the Governor's office
came to an
agreement on fixing the funding formula
to make sure schools would be able
to open.
But knowing the composition of the state
legislature, and the hostility of the Republican leadership in both chambers
to Prop B, we knew that we'd have
to entertain compromise
on some elements of the
agreement (at no point, ever, publically, has Pacelle or anyone from HSUS mentioned any thought of compromise — and likely, this is why they didn't have a seat at the table when it
came to this new law), in order
to protect the measure for the long term and
to obviate the need for a second public vote
on the issue.