Not exact matches
The
question is a
legitimate one,
about the UK government copying
policies from the Scottish government.
Whether we're talking
about free speech on Usenet, the
policy questions of
legitimate marketing and com - mercial activity conducted over email, or the desirable but spam - ish mes - sages that trip the filters and disappear, there is always friction not around the most egregious case (no one argues for Leo Kuvayev's «\ / 1@gR / - \» messages) but at the blurry places where spam threatens to blend into acceptable use, and fighting one might have a deleterious effect on the other.
The
questions Paul has raised during his filibuster
about the Obama administration's abuse of power (and that of predecessor George W. Bush) in the foreign
policy (and even domestic intelligence) arenas, especially in the use of drones to murder innocent lives in Afghanistan, are
legitimate.