Sentences with phrase «lenzing modal»

«Any time you look at any kind of real life piece of text or utterance that one human wrote or said to another human, it's filled with analogies, modal logic, belief, expectation, fear, nested modals, lots of variables and quantifiers,» Lenat said.

He ended up buying micro modal, a soft fabric that's sleeker than cotton but still absorbs moisture.

But about once every five times users subsequently logged in, we showed them a fun modal that prompted them to give us more information in a whimsical way.

Organisational values will be of paramount importance in the new millennium, says Modal (Measurable Organisational Development and Learning) managing director Neil McGrechan.

For example, the focus of the SEP on the each participant's modal forecast does not convey how much uncertainty there is about the economic outlook.

Just an FYI — you'll get a modal window asking you to create an account (still free) but you can close it by clicking the «no thank you» gray linked text at the bottom.

This opens a modal with your mortgage details.

The Fed's dots forecast refer to a modal scenario of continued recovery.

You can edit posts while you're on the calendar page — just click on the post to open the following modal dialog: This dialog is very...

Additionally, the dots refer to the modal (most likely) rather than the average future scenario.

You are exactly right — When using Ubersuggest if you use the little green plus signs you can build a list of relevant keywords in the right sidebar and then click the «get button» which will render a modal that you can copy and paste from, very simple.

But, beyond these limitations of particulars, the general modal individualisation is limited in two ways: In the first place it is an actual course of events, which might be otherwise so far as concerns eternal possibility, but is that course.

So far as the general metaphysical situation is concerned, there might have been an indiscriminate modal pluralism apart from logical or other limitation.

The dipolar modal contrast between finite life and eternal life is not to be found in one actual entity who is an exception to the meaning of «actuality» by never dying satisfied (nor being born).

While the Small Catechism is well suited for the purpose for which it was written, it is not well suited to our modal Evangelical seeker, who already has a passing knowledge of the Scriptures and is looking for deeper answers.

A dipolar modal contrast is within the all - inclusive or supreme pole.

Modal dipolar contrasts are built upon epochal dipolar contrasts, and in every case upon the Ultimate Categoreal Contrast between coming - to - be and come - to - be.

He charged that the new teaching was a form of modal monarchianism, which had been condemned as heresy by the early church fathers.

Perhaps it hinges on a confusion between (1) the necessity for there to be a modal dipolarity between God and the World and (2) the necessity for there to be an epochal dipolarity within God, that is, for the moments of God to exhibit the fundamental dipolarity (expressed by the Category of the Ultimate) between the present moment of God - as - creating and all previous moments of God - as - created which the present contains.

We have now seen how, between a philosophy of creative act which excludes the possibility of the real relation of God to the world and a modal philosophy which demands reciprocal relations between God and the world, it is possible to posit a «third position — a philosophy of creative act with real but asymmetrical relations between God and the world.

(If the world had all forms, there would be «indiscriminate modal pluralism,» a very fancy name for chaos.)

It therefore appeals to the following truth of modal logic:

Second, the limitation of which Whitehead speaks is not merely that of one particular value given to an abstract scheme (PW 78/79), but concerns the fact that there are particular, ordered actualities rather than «an indiscriminate modal pluralism» (SMW 256).

Clarke, Bowman L., «Modal Disproofs and Proofs for God,» Southern Journal of Philosophy 9, 3 (Fall, 1971), 247 - 258.

Nelson, John O., «Modal Logic and the Ontological Proof for God's Existence,» Review of Metaphysics 17, 2 (Dec., 1963), 285 - 242.

Space is symmetrical in its mathematical, abstract form: — isotropic, static, one - modal.

For most this involves most or all of these: discursive reasoning, intentional reference (thinking «of»), propositional inference, judgement of relative values across a range of («modal») possibilities, and positive intentions leading to action.

Indeed, whenever there is a need to call forth some sense of solemn liturgy a modal piece comes on featuring vague outlines of Kyrie Eleison and Agnus Dei.

First, he shows that one may discern two versions of the argument in Anselm and Descartes, one of which is more properly a modal argument, not obviously vulnerable to textbook refutations.

He was the first to publish a formalized version of the argument, using the calculus of modal logic («Logic of the Ontological Argument» 471; Logic of Perfection 50 - 51).

The third Hartshornean contribution to understanding the ontological proof has more far - reaching implications, for it concerns the interpretation of the modal operators used in the argument.

Thus, Hartshorne's semantics for the modal operators in the ontological argument is constructed along the lines of a de re modality of temporal becoming rather than a de dicto modality of sets of consistent sentences — Goodwin (1978) is admirably clear on this point in his book.

The price for this interpretation is that the table no longer represents the views of those who believe that God or the world are impossible or have no modal status.

Inevitably, the modal question of «logical» and «real» possibility will arise.

On the other hand, whether the zeros mean impossibility or lacking modal status, there are more options than are explicitly represented on the table.

If the zeros mean lacking modal status then it is arguable that any view with a zero, excepting O.o, is unacceptable in the sense that it makes an arbitrary distinction between modal terms as applied to God and the world.

God impossible or Contingency as Applied wholly contingent and contingent in no modal status to God and the World necessary different respects

A typical Hartshornian restatement of Anselm's argument in the language of modern modal logic runs about like this: Since God is by definition not conceivably surpassable, and since a being whose existence is necessary surpasses one whose existence is merely contingent, therefore, God's existence must be necessary existence.

This, coincidentally, would remove a major criticism leveled against Whitehead: that his is essentially a descriptive rather than an explanatory metaphysics, adducing principles that apply (in contemporary modal jargon) to this actual, rather than generally to any possible, world.

6 There would not seem to be a problem for modal logic in Whitehead's theory of propositions since a proposition as such is in principle exclusive of» the question of existence, although the picked out content exists insofar as it is «picked out.»

According to Hartshorne, all thought — if free of absurdity or inconsistency — represents something necessary (and so never simply future) or else something contingent (and so now future, or once future).28 In either case, the modal concept is related to the experienceable, furnishing a potential datum for knowledge or awareness.

I have been strongly influenced by the challenge Spinoza issues to us all to take seriously the question of the modal structure of reality.

The first violates the principle of contrast and thus makes modal terms, including necessity, vacuous.

Whitehead has found a way to affirm both meanings by modal differentiation.

For me it is a credible and illuminating view of modal terms to hold that they get their meaning entirely from the freedom of the creative process, in both its worldly and its divine aspects.

In fact, since modal concepts are among the categories, we should ask why must reality have just this structure?

Ford is correct that Hartshorne can not affirm a primordial decision without rendering inconsistent his notion of time, and his notion of possibility as well, since such a decision would presuppose the modal framework it would impose.

If the analogy is denied, what relevance does the cosmic history of causality, involving an infinity of decisions, have in Hartshorne's (or anyone's) system for the modal status of necessity?

Describing his constructive theory as «modal - psychological,» he takes some cues from St. Augustine and suggests that the temporal dimension of reality may be «best conceived as the memory - creativity structure of experience as such.

Hartshorne finds important evidence for this modal asymmetry between past and future in the human ability to remember past events vividly and in detail and to anticipate the future only vaguely and generally.50 Moreover, he holds that the past is completely fixed in irrevocable detail, since every event, once it is actualized, is real forevermore.