Less government expenditure, so less STATE TAXES!!!!!! What a thought.
Not exact matches
That's why analysts expect the
government to look for operating
expenditure cuts — such as cutting remaining fuel subsidies — even as it tries to keep up development spending and target lower - income households, often called the B40, or bottom 40 percent with incomes of
less than around 2,500 ringgit a month.
In order to meet the mandates set by the SAP, a country spends
less by cutting back
government expenditures, social services, and economic investments so that resources can be placed elsewhere.
They argue that «debt - service payments force
governments to reduce public health
expenditures -LSB-... and show that] each additional $ 40,000 of health spending is associated with one
less infant death» in Africa (p. 82).
If you sum the cost of all the infrastructure
expenditure undertaken by this NDC
government from loans, grants and taxes between 2009 and 2015 it is
less than $ 7 billion.
The effect was even stronger when only those
expenditures were counted that went to independent private institutions receiving
less than half of their core funding from
government.
There is no a priori reason to assume that
expenditures by
governments are
less productive for society and the economy than
expenditures by taxpayers are.
Government expenditures to keep open unnecessary military bases seem a lot
less productive than
expenditures by private citizens for good housing.
The bad news is that it will cost, but nothing the environmentalists or
governments will ever do about this issue will cost you
less than this, and most of what they want to do will take control away from you and waste most of your
expenditure in bureaucratic bungling and misguided foolishness, in my opinion.
Government - led efforts that are
less obviously related — such as detailed geological surveys and the defense - related
expenditures described earlier that enabled the U.S. - centered information - technology revolution, which has in turn created the capacity to more rapidly develop «smart drilling» technology — have clearly also been important.
Higher
government spending allocated towards military meant
less was available for social and economic
expenditure.
Such
expenditure is justified by the
government on the basis that it is important for the national good that land issues be settled by agreement, and because negotiation will overall prove to be
less costly than litigation.
Personal consumption
expenditures were slightly weaker, investment was
less negative based on
less drag from the energy sector and equipment spending,
government spending... Read More»