Sentences with phrase «less questions answered»

That is more or less the question answered by the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in a decision issued last July that Boston IP lawyer Lee Gesmer dissects in a post yesterday at his MassLawBlog.

Not exact matches

So knowing the right answer to a tough question appears to be less important than being able to consider a large number of social responses in a brief window of time,» Von Hippel said of the study findings.

While answering a question about other names that were considered for the series — one being «Nonprophit,» when the script focused more on the main character's job at a non-profit and less on her friendship with Molly — she mentioned it was a challenge selling network executives on the name Insecure.

The appointment of Christian Sewing as Deutsche Bank's chief executive officer to replace an embattled John Cryan after less than three years — and three turnaround plans — answered just one of the questions hanging over the struggling institution.

Over the past few decades, the sale of such goods migrated largely to big - box multinational chains, where employees couldn't care less about answering customers» questions or concerns.

Other questions genotype analysis could answer include whether a given athlete is at elevated risk for tendon ruptures or cartilage tears, whether her muscles require more or less recovery time than the norm, and why certain diets work for some people and not others.

In such campaigns, firmly answering the general's question before going all - in is less necessary than when contemplating the commitment of hundreds of thousands of troops with heavy casualties and applying the Powell Doctrine.

You've got to try to answer each of these questions in a sentence or less.

By going through these questions and answering them honestly, you will uncover the root cause of great or less - than - optimal performance.

Second, as the Committee itself noted, the dilbit report answers only half of the spills question, and possibly the less important one.

In a blog post, Amit Singhal, senior vice president of Google Search, explained how comparison and filter tools built into Google's «Knowledge Graph» will let users ask questions that don't necessarily have simple answers in a way that feels less like a search and more like a conversation.

These couples have actually met (and mated, though we don't know if they're still together), they're sometimes answering questions about matters of life and death, and they have much less incentive to lie.

Your participation will involve answering 48 questions that will take you less than 30 minutes.

Even as Bitcoin exchanges have proliferated around the globe, the answers to these questions have been less than clear.

I had almost given up, when I stumbled across this video, which is less than 10 minutes long and answered all my questions so perfectly that I nearly jumped for joy — it's definitely worth a watch.

Your mind is so closed to that possibility that you will never be able to frame the correct questions, much less find the answers.

If even Luther's question was impossible for traditional Christianity to assimilate, much less his answer, obviously his new faith demanded a new church.

Answering the questions of «what» and «why» we should «make cupboards» is tantamount to it being an instruction manual, albeit with less detail.

Professor Wilken has answered another, lesser question of the role of reason (and of tradition) in apologetics, ethics, and polity.

«Goddidit» is not an answer to anything, much less an answer to a «why» question.

He is less successful at answering questions that liturgical skeptics are likely to ask.

One major reason that institutions are inherently conservative is that continuing in existing ruts is far easier and less demanding than asking searching questions and allowing ourselves to be reshaped by the answers.

Perhaps the question as to what their church - relationship means is asked less searchingly among us because of the apparent self - evidence of the answer: we are preparing ministerial leadership for the churches.

If we answer the question of «what is God like» with anything other than Jesus of Nazareth, we end with something less than the gospel.

It is a strange picture that we are given of Jesus during these first days in the temple: arguing freely with Sadducees, scribes, and Pharisees; parrying more or less subtle attempts to lure him into statements that could be used against him; answering sincere questions and approving good answers to his own questions; pronouncing fiery invectives against influential teachers who opposed him; lamenting the failure of Jerusalem to respond to his challenge; and then calmly pointing out to his disciples the tiny but sacrificial offering of a poor widow.

Joseph Ratzinger had answered from the Christian perspective precisely the question that Pope Francis» homily raised (if less reverently) in some circles of skeptics yesterday: If non-believers can go to heaven, why bother with faith at all?

And back then, wasn't it the fans wrapped up in «theories» who were ultimately disappointed when they found out that Lost wasn't really concerned with answering the thousands of questions it had raised — that it was less a heady show about theology and science and more an emotional show about its characters and the human experience?

No set of answers for a question received less than 80 percent agreement, and 18 of the 27 items were rated with 100 percent agreement.

Answering his own questions, Piper says, «Here's my rule of thumb: the more responsible a person is to shape the thoughts of others about God, the less Arminianism should be tolerated.

Whatever the answer to this question, we shall certainly be able to develop certain less complete implications of each of the basic experiences by which religion will be defined.

The answer to the question of Jesus's historical existence will not make me more or less happy, content, hopeful, likable, rich, famous, or immortal.

These questions have not been properly asked, much less properly answered.

Good luck trying to answer questions you don't understand with concepts you understand even less.

I'm answering to the question of religion preventing violence in terms of the sum total of violence — is there more or less violence with religion.

By actual count, less than one third of the people who attended the postservice discussion were able to make a clear statement of the sermon's central question and the «answer» that it offered.

This answer is not implied in the statement of the question, as it might seem to be, for God's relation to man as the eternal Thou which never becomes an It does not make any the less real the «silence» or «eclipse» of God when He appears to hide Himself and we cut ourselves off from relation with Him.

Even though some questions can indeed, and perhaps should, be answered with a clear yes or no, in the field of ethics one comes across gray areas where clear - cut answers are less than helpful.

But, as Rüdiger Safranski makes clear throughout his carefully researched, philosophically informed and remarkably lucid account of Heidegger's development, the master of questions was considerably less a master of answers.

The affirmation in Mark 14:61 in answer to Pilate's question is less likely to have been spoken by Jesus than the replies given in Matthew 27:11 and Luke 22:70, for if he had said that he was the Son of God, the Jews could have put him to death for blasphemy.

No question about Jesus can be asked with less likelihood of an assured answer, but the question must be asked nevertheless if we would approach an understanding of the meaning of Jesus in the early church.

Again, it seems clear that many more or less technical questions of education can not be answered theologically.

This speaking of God may ultimately only point to the question which is man himself and thus hint at God's mystery in silence, the result may be less adequate than any statement on another subject, the answer, aimed at God's bright «heaven», may ever again fall back into the dark sphere of man or may consist in inexorably upholding the question that transcends any definition, formula or phenomenon.

However, Rice also notes that there was, and always has been, another side both to Calvin and the Reformed tradition — a side that was less confident in the intellect's ability to answer all questions — a side that could acknowledge ambiguity and be open to mystery at the heart of the faith — and that understood God to be immanent as well as transcendent, and one whose «dependability came not from being unchanging, but from being loving.»

Apart from the influence of Buddhism, Western process thinkers have hardly asked these questions, much less answered them.

The interviewer asks if this wouldn't make us less than human, which was the question we would have asked, and Vatinno answers: «Becoming less human is not necessarily a negative thing, because it could mean we are less subject to the whims of nature, such as illness or climate extremes.»

I've been hesitant to answer this question at one level because hindsight is 20/20, and it feels a little less than honest to (a) see how things play out and then (b) pronounce how I should have done things differently.

For process thinkers of a Whiteheadian bent, the answer to these questions is less optimistic than it is for the disciples of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.

So, to answer your question: the kind of «knowing» I apply to scripture is not of an objective / historical / scientific kind, but a kind that is, at least for me, no less true.

Sometimes it almost sounds as if «creativity» is intended as an answer to that question, (For example, he speaks of «the creativity whereby there is a becoming of entities superseding the one in question» [PR 129]-RRB- but it can be so even less than Aristotle's prime matter.

Berkouwer's answer to this question is that theological dialogue remains open regarding the lesser ranked truths while moving toward greater agreement concerning the foundations of faith.