Sentences with phrase «less sets because»

I have been getting a lot of great feedback on my Trends For Less sets because lets face it, we're all not rolling in dough!

Not exact matches

To set the record straight, we use Sodium Coco Sulfate (SCS) in our brand's laundry detergent because it is a gentler alternative that is less irritating and safer to use.»

to further validate his or her integrity) because anything else indicates a lesser degree of integrity from the high bar you should be setting for selecting future leaders.

In time, it may get less dire, because the E.U. is giving its 28 member countries the ability to set their own age restrictions, and some may opt for an age younger than the pan-European ban.

I like work flexibility because I can more or less set my own hours.

The death penalty should be abolished not for religious reasons (also religious people seem to approve of the dath penalty — which to me makes no sense) but because every person who is killed is one less set of DNA to be passed on to succeeding generations, and who knows what those wasted genes could mean for the future of the species?

they simply took a little of the blood leaking from the bullet hole, labeled it with his name, took a swab of his mouth, marked it as an unknown donor, then sent it all to las vegas, where it was tested in tv time on the set of CSI, BECAUSE THAT IS THE ONLY PLACE I HAVE EVER HEARD OF A TEST LIKE THAT TAKING LESS THAN TWO WEEKS.

Catholic theologians at non «Catholic universities might even set the trend with respect to the mandate, precisely because they are less concerned with a bishop «interfering» in their universities.

In his sermon «St Paul's Characteristic Gift», Newman shows St Paul is numbered among another group «in whom the supernatural combines with nature, instead of superseding it, invigorating it, elevating it, ennobling it; and who are not the less men, because they are saints».6 Newman argues that the characteristic that sets the Apostle apart is that the fullness of the divine gifts do not destroy his humanity but rather elevate and perfect it.

The reason for this transition, Luke indicates, is not because God has now «chosen» the Gentiles instead of His other «chosen» people, the Jews, but because the Gentiles were more open to hearing, considering, examining, and accepting the things Paul preached to them, while the Jews are more set in their traditional ways and beliefs, and so are less willing to consider that they might be wrong.

The New Testament puts less emphasis on direct political judgments, both because of its eschatological setting and because Jesus and his disciples were not even citizens of the political empire in which they lived.

Missionary dating, dating someone of another faith, marrying someone of another faith... these things all come about because trusting God is extremely difficult when life becomes less than we expected, when frustration sets in because things aren't happening the way we think they are supposed to.

Because that is the day we arrive and set up camp, we've generally tried to avoid a big complicated meal, but our standards are no less high.

It is because of this that when I set out to make one on my own I decide to shake things up a bit by using less olives and adding a can of artichoke hearts to the mix.

Here the shutter speed is much less important, because the strobe is fast enough to freeze motion, and you really want to balance the power of the flash with the ambient daylight, so you need to adjust your flash (and other settings) accordingly.

Next inject your pork chops with the broth / cider vinegar mixture ans set them aside while you fire up the grill, I left mine out for about an hour because the closer to room temp they are before cooking, the less time they need on the heat.

The recommendations relating to competition have not been enacted (yet)- they included reinstating specific anti-price discrimination provisions, inhibiting firms achieving market power through takeovers or abusing market power (because they didn't think ss 46 and / or 50 were effective in achieving this) and expressly defining «market power» «so that it is less than market dominance and does not require a firm to have unfettered power to set prices» (apparently they were unfamiliar with the 2007 amendments to s 46).

Absolutely right there He won't go anywhere because he does what the board wants him to He delivers profit and very low risk and sets expectations at virtually zero so that's the fans don't expect too m7ch and he doesn't have to deliver and the board don't need to spend Its a farce and more importantly a blatant con Every single fan who puts even a penny into the club either through season tickets right the way down to buying a mug or a pen or a shirt is being robbed by a board who care NOTHING for sporting glory and even less for the fans who finance the club There SHOULD be mass walkouts on home games and protests at every turn but, there won't be because the demographic of fans now is of a majority who are not true supporters but millennial who only want to say they attend the ground every other week.

Maybe it's less about trying to be safe right now, because it's not like there is any indication the bulls have the building blocks of a contender being set right now.

Even if they turn out to be just the usual sort of spurious rumours that we will be seeing a lot more of in the coming months, the Arsenal boss still looks set to have a big problem with his star striker, all because of the strange decision to hold another Copa America tournament this summer, even though the last one was held less than a year ago, with Alexis scoring the winning penalty against Argentina to win it for the first time.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

We can't set standards at the school level that's A.) based strictly on calories and B.) based on kids being overweight because that only addresses less than half of the kids in the school system.

This is particularly a shame because when parents set any kind of media rules, kids were found to spend a lot less time on them.

Keeping a set schedule means that children tend to wake up at the same time every day, eat their meals at the same time, and give parents less trouble when going down for naps and bedtime because they know what to expect.

The Cotton One Size are on the 3rd setting because they fit tighter with less stretch.

The ability to buy additional glass inserts adds convenience and affordability and reduces the carbon footprint in the environment because you use less plastic (our 4oz starter set demonstrates this feature).

You don't want all those cute baby clothes marred by set - in stains because you have unwisely opted to use a less than effective detergent.

No one argues that Nestlé is the only company to have been involved in less - than - perfect practices - Ibfan and, in the UK, the campaigning group Baby Milk Action, say they target the company because they claim it has violated the code more than any other single company worldwide, and also that - as a market leader - it should be setting an example.

I'm just determined that we use it as a building block, because I believe then we can get better healthcare to more people, we can have a more effective set of public services for more people — not less — and that's the key part.

Providing an answer has not been easy, because close examination of the detailed tables for the two sets of polls simply uncovers the fact that phone polls find more Remain voters than internet polls do within more or less every category of voter.

«I think they're setting up here because, for decades, the South Bronx has been considered a place where people matter less.

More appropriate goals will result in «better opportunities for MWBEs and less time wasted by both agencies and contractors alike pursuing goals inappropriate and unachievable for specific contracts because they have been set arbitrarily to 30 percent,» Elmendorf said.

Regarding the concern that such a policy might drive up construction costs, Brown said the opposite would more likely be true because the 20 percent set aside for disadvantaged workers would likely bring in more workers with less experience and who would be paid at a lower rate.

«In conferences and settings where we teach physicians about responsible opioid prescribing, one of the obstacles frequently mentioned is patient satisfaction, and the idea that physicians might be chastised or receive less compensation because their patient satisfaction scores are low,» said Dr. Babu.

Doubling one's kitchenware would seem to run counter to the «less is more» mantra of contemporary environmentalism but, as Stern notes, because both sets are never used simultaneously, the useful life of each is likely extended over time.

Because part of the helium is motionless, the amount of force required to set the bucket and helium rotating is less than it would be otherwise.

Speaking for myself I would say that my arms took off with new growth when I decided that I would train them less because they were a strong point and I wanted to give other body parts more of my recovery time and leave my arms to only a few sets at the end of my workouts.

If you are recovering fast enough, it would be logical to do multiple sets to failure rather than less, because it will stimulate more muscle growth in one workout.»

For example: setting yourself healthy long - term goals of eating better and drinking less in the lead - up to an event because you know it gives you more energy and mental clarity as opposed to the «need to lose 5 kg yesterday» mentality that leads to depravation and stressful energy.»

That's significantly less than the 2,300 - milligram daily limit set for most people with normal blood pressure (the amount in one teaspoon of table salt), because studies have shown that sodium and high blood pressure are inextricably, and dangerously, linked.

«Smoking tobacco from a water pipe attracts young users because it is flavored and sweetened, done in a social setting and is often less irritating compared to cigarette smoking,» Primack said.

Because I see the bar every day I use it every day, at least once and in less than 3 weeks I can now do 2 sets of 5 reps, it's an amazing exercise and incredible how just a little — maybe 2 mins (max) several times a day — can make such a difference.

Dr. Justin Marchegiani: Yeah, if we have like a small intestinal bacterial overgrowth or a dysbiosis, that's gonna set us up to have an inability to break down food optimally because our hydrochloric acid and enzyme levels will be less, so we got ta make sure that that's good because if not, that good healthy diet may not be getting into our bloodstream and — and going where it needs to go.

Because the reps are higher and the risks are lower in phase one, you'll need fewer warm - up sets and you'll also need slightly less rest between sets than you will in phase two.

I haven't tried it because my opinion is that drop sets would likely be less effective than straight sets.

It requires a lot more energy and does a lot more damage doing say, 10 × 10 (or your 15 × 5), than it does doing one set of 25 - 50 or 50 - 100 reps.. In the end, you get less hypertrophy with high volume heavy lifting, because a) you still have all that myostatin buildup from heavy lifting suppressing hypertrophy, b) you don't sufficiently fatigue medium and fast twitch fibers, c) you don't get the increased IGF - 1 production and increased protein synthesis that you would get from high reps, and d) because the energy requirements of repairing the damage caused by heavy lifting are too high.

That's why there's a window of reps (6 - 10 or 8 - 12, etc.), because your third set WILL be a shorter set of less reps than that first set, trust me.

Because the heavier weight uses more muscle fibers you can get away with less sets and reps.. Another thing to consider when you go heavy is that the high threshold motor units are activated.